Advertisement

Mrs Prest’s Heavenly Husband

  • Megan L. Hickerson

Abstract

When Foxe, through the testimony of Prest’s wife, articulates the reason for her abandonment of her husband, he does so using the language of heavenly marriage: Prest is married to Christ — not in martyrdom itself so much as in election — and thus she necessarily rejects the things of the world, including earthly authority — ecclesiastical, legal and marital. Persecuted in one city — her earthly marriage — she leaves it for another — heavenly marriage — in the process rejecting as well such mundane realities as carnality, flesh, human or feminine weakness and familial obligation. She describes the things she rejects through reference to their relationship to nature, flesh and the world. The husband she has abandoned is ‘earthly’, the life she has given up is ‘carnall’ and her children are ‘mortal’. Her wisdom seems foolishness to ‘carnall men of this world’. She, whose ‘one husband’ is already with her in ‘this Citie’, has been chosen by God, elected to a status of the spirit, transcending nature, above even gender — an earthly construct — and the social restraints that accompany it. For Foxe’s women martyrs to forsake the things of the world, including the traditional obligations of their sex, even disassociating themselves from their familial responsibilities, is to act in a positive manner, proving themselves members of the heavenly city, the invisible church, as brides of Christ.

Keywords

Catholic Church Familial Obligation Exemplary Behaviour White Shirt Mundane Reality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For discussion of fears in Oxford, see Charles Edward Mallet, The History of the University of Oxford (London: Methuen & Co., 1924)Google Scholar
  2. also, V. H. H. Green, A History of Oxford University (London: B.T. Batsford, 1974), 39.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    (H. G. Koenigsberger, Medieval Europe, 400–1500 [Essex: Longman Group UK, 1987], 165–7).Google Scholar
  4. 30.
    For a recent discussion, see, for example, Catherine Mooney, ed., Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  5. 32.
    See also Charlotte D’Evelyn, ‘Saints’ Legends’, in A Manual of the Writings in Middle English, 1050–1500, ed. J. Burke Severs (Hamden, CT: Archon, 1970), II, 561–635.Google Scholar
  6. 33.
    Gail Ashton, The Generation of Identity in Late Medieval Hagiography (London and New York: Routledge, 2000), 24.Google Scholar
  7. 36.
    Matthias Illyricus Flacius, Ecclesiastica Historia, integrant Ecclesiae Christi ideam quantum ad locum, propagationem … per aliquot studiosos et pios viros in urbe Magdeburgicœ (Basle, 1564 [1561–74]), cent IIII, xii, 1411 (Oo2[v]).Google Scholar
  8. 37.
    (Aurelius Clemens Prudentius, ‘Hymn in honore scen Eulalie ugis & martyris’, Opera Aurelii dementis prudentii [Seventer: Pattroed, c. 1490], Pi[r]).Google Scholar
  9. 40.
    (Jacobus Philippus Bergomensis, ‘De sancta Eugenia virgine & martyre’, in De Claris Mulieribus: De Memora Bilibus et Claris Mulieribus: Aliquot Diversorum Scriptorum Opera [Paris: Simonis Colinaci, 1521], 72v).Google Scholar
  10. 53.
    (see Catharine Mooney, ‘Voice, Gender, and the Portrayal of Sanctity’, in Catherine Mooney, ed., Gendered Voices: Medieval Saints and their Interpreters [Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999], 11–12).Google Scholar
  11. (John Kitchen, Saints’ Lives and the Rhetoric of Gender: Male and Female in Merovingian Hagiography [New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998], 108–9).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Megan L. Hickerson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan L. Hickerson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations