Advertisement

Gospelling Sisters and Women ‘Goinge up and Downe’: Foxe and his Detractors

  • Megan L. Hickerson

Abstract

Foxe is often lauded by modern critics as the liberator of Askew’s Examinations for the simple fact of having reproduced them in the Acts and Monuments without Bale’s elucidation. In the quest for that rare commodity, the early modern, female voice, critics have tended both to read the first-person texts claimed as Askew’s against Bale’s elucidation of them in the early editions of the Examinations and to find in Foxe’s treatment of them a more liberated, less encumbered, female voice. In a recent article on Foxe’s editing of the Examinations for the Acts and Monuments, however, Thomas Freeman and Sarah Wall take issue with this sort of approach to the Examinations, arguing that far from providing a medium for Askew’s unencumbered self-expression, Foxe actively framed and modelled the Examinations such that he, as much as Bale before him, must be considered not as the presenter of her voice, but as a collaborator in the actual production of her testimony. Drawing attention to Foxe’s textual interventions into, and his aesthetic choices for shaping, the body of the Examinations, Freeman and Wall identify some of the material ways in which he ‘imprints his influence, his beliefs, and his politics all over Askew’s narrative’.2 In this they challenge the idea that Askew, as primary author, can be read against the intervention (or its lack) of either of her first two, male editors: as no autographed manuscript of any part of the Examinations survives, Askew can, as a discrete authorial voice, be contrasted neither to Bale nor to Foxe.

Keywords

Female Voice Disorderly Behaviour Female Strength Sexual Guilt Female Erudition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 13.
    Roland H. Bainton, Women of the Reformation in France and England (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1973), 211.Google Scholar
  2. 14.
    Linda Woodbridge, Women in the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540–1620 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1984), 53.Google Scholar
  3. 15.
    See, for example, Davis, ‘City Women and Religious Change’; Steven Ozment, When Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
  4. Lawrence Stone, The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500–1800 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977)Google Scholar
  5. Keith Thomas, ‘Women and the Civil War Sects’, Past and Present 13 (1958): 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 17.
    Mary Elizabeth Perry, Gender and Disorder in Early Modem Seville (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 177; Roper, Holy Household.Google Scholar
  7. 22.
    Susannah Brietz Monta, ‘The Inheritance of Anne Askew, English Protestant Martyr’, Archiv fur Reformationsgeschichte/Archive for Reformation History 94 (2003): 148.Google Scholar
  8. 23.
    (Marsha S. Robinson, ‘Doctors, Silly Poor Women, and Rebel Whores: the Gendering of Conscience in Foxe’s Acts and Monuments’, in John Foxe and his World, ed. Christopher Highley and John King [Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002], 239–41.Google Scholar
  9. 36.
    See Brad S. Gregory, Salvation at Stake: Christian Martyrdom in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999), 280.Google Scholar
  10. 39.
    Robert Parsons, The Third Part of a Treatise intituled of Three Conversions of England: Conteyninge an examen of the Calendar or Catalogue of Protestant Saintes, Martyrs and Confessors, devised by Fox … by N.D. (St Omer: 1604), X, xi, 491–2.Google Scholar
  11. 41.
    John Christopherson, An exhortation to all menne to take hede and beware of rebellion … (London: John Cawood, 1554), T.ii.v-iii.r. The dangerous inversion of order accompanying Protestantism is highlighted in the shoulder-note aside this passage: ‘of wives to their husbandes’.Google Scholar
  12. 43.
    Miles Huggarde, The Displaying of the Protestantes (London, 1556), 47r.Google Scholar
  13. 91.
    Thomas Harding, A Reioindre to M. Jewels Replie against the Sacrifice of the Masse: In which the doctrine of the Answere to the xvii. Article of his Chalenge is defended, and further proved, and al that his Replie conteineth against the Sacrifice, is clearely confuted, and disproved (Louvanii: Joannem Foulerum, 1567), 184v.Google Scholar
  14. 93.
    Foxe’s defence has been checked and verified. See D. M. Ogier, Reformation and Society in Guernsey (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  15. 98.
    Jean Crespin’s Histoire des vrays tesmoins (1570).Google Scholar
  16. (Nikki Shepardson, ‘Gender and the Rhetoric of Martyrdom in Jean Crespin’s Histoire des vrays tesmoins’, Sixteenth Century Journal 35, 1 (Spring 2004), 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Megan L. Hickerson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan L. Hickerson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations