Abstract
Although the new reform ministry in 1830 included Canningites and a single ultra Tory, the Duke of Richmond, a relative of Lord Holland, Grey presided over a Whig-dominated coalition government. As a coalition, it invites comparison with the Talents ministry of 1806–7 while raising questions about factionalism among the Whigs themselves. Whig attitudes had shifted over the intervening years, however, toward a much broader view that drew support beyond the political world at Westminster and engaged a wider set of issues. The inclusion of five veterans of earlier Tory administrations did not dilute the government’s Whig character, but rather it provided a welcome infusion of new talent committed to its agenda.1 Pressed forward at times against their will by Brougham during the 1810s and 20s, the Whigs had overcome great difficulties to gain power, and the experience from those years helped sustain them in office. Decades in opposition had forged a consensus within a Whig party that reunited in mid-1830 just as its opponents collapsed into factional quarrels. Having broadened their appeal during the 1820s, the Whigs now stood pledged to a general programme of measured reform.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Francis Jeffrey, The State of the Nation’, Edinburgh Review (January 1810):505.
Philip Harling defines the Tory ‘disciplinary ethos’ in ‘Robert Southey and the Language of Social Discipline’, Albion, 30.4 (winter 1998).
H.J. Hanham, The Reformed Electoral System in Great Britain, 1832–1914 (London: Historical Association, 1968), 12, 28–30.
N. Gash, Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in The Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 2nd edn (Hassocks: Harvester, 1977), xiii, 393–6, Hanham, 18–22.
[Alexander Somerville], Autobiography of a Working Man (London: Turnstile Press, 1848), 143.
Fulford and Strachey, Greville Memoirs, 20 November 1830, II:64–5.
Russell, Recollections and Suggestions, 1813–1873 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1875), 74. Durham’s biographer, however, noted that others attributed the phrase to Edward Ellice, Grey’s brother-in-law and government whip in the Commons. Reid, Life and Letters of Durham, I:259.
Donald Southgate, The Passing of the Whigs, 1832–86 (London: Macmillan, 1962), 55n.
Fulford and Strachey, Greville Memoirs, January 1828, I:196.
Melbourne’s speech, Parl. Deb. 3rd ser., 44(3 August 1838):976.
Copyright information
© 2005 William Anthony Hay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hay, W.A. (2005). Conclusion. In: The Whig Revival, 1808–1830. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510623_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510623_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51360-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51062-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)