Conclusion

  • William Anthony Hay
Part of the Studies in Modern History book series (SMH)

Abstract

Although the new reform ministry in 1830 included Canningites and a single ultra Tory, the Duke of Richmond, a relative of Lord Holland, Grey presided over a Whig-dominated coalition government. As a coalition, it invites comparison with the Talents ministry of 1806–7 while raising questions about factionalism among the Whigs themselves. Whig attitudes had shifted over the intervening years, however, toward a much broader view that drew support beyond the political world at Westminster and engaged a wider set of issues. The inclusion of five veterans of earlier Tory administrations did not dilute the government’s Whig character, but rather it provided a welcome infusion of new talent committed to its agenda.1 Pressed forward at times against their will by Brougham during the 1810s and 20s, the Whigs had overcome great difficulties to gain power, and the experience from those years helped sustain them in office. Decades in opposition had forged a consensus within a Whig party that reunited in mid-1830 just as its opponents collapsed into factional quarrels. Having broadened their appeal during the 1820s, the Whigs now stood pledged to a general programme of measured reform.

Keywords

Mercury Income Arena Defend Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Francis Jeffrey, The State of the Nation’, Edinburgh Review (January 1810):505.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Philip Harling defines the Tory ‘disciplinary ethos’ in ‘Robert Southey and the Language of Social Discipline’, Albion, 30.4 (winter 1998).Google Scholar
  3. 9.
    H.J. Hanham, The Reformed Electoral System in Great Britain, 1832–1914 (London: Historical Association, 1968), 12, 28–30.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    N. Gash, Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in The Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 2nd edn (Hassocks: Harvester, 1977), xiii, 393–6, Hanham, 18–22.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    [Alexander Somerville], Autobiography of a Working Man (London: Turnstile Press, 1848), 143.Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    Fulford and Strachey, Greville Memoirs, 20 November 1830, II:64–5.Google Scholar
  7. 18.
    Russell, Recollections and Suggestions, 1813–1873 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1875), 74. Durham’s biographer, however, noted that others attributed the phrase to Edward Ellice, Grey’s brother-in-law and government whip in the Commons. Reid, Life and Letters of Durham, I:259.Google Scholar
  8. 24.
    Donald Southgate, The Passing of the Whigs, 1832–86 (London: Macmillan, 1962), 55n.Google Scholar
  9. 25.
    Fulford and Strachey, Greville Memoirs, January 1828, I:196.Google Scholar
  10. 27.
    Melbourne’s speech, Parl. Deb. 3rd ser., 44(3 August 1838):976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© William Anthony Hay 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Anthony Hay

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations