A Revolution in Parties: 1827–30

  • William Anthony Hay
Part of the Studies in Modern History book series (SMH)

Abstract

Opposition parties in Britain rarely drive governments from office, but rather seize upon an administration’s own failure to hold power. The Whigs realized in the late 1820s that they could gain office only after Liverpool’s government and the Tory phalanx that sustained it had collapsed. The Tory ascendancy cracked when a stroke on 17 February 1827 left Liverpool ‘if not actually, at least politically dead’.1 The Morning Chronicle. rightly deemed it ‘extremely unlikely that he will ever again submit to the toils and anxieties from which it is understood he has long been anxious to free himself’.2 The consequent scramble for power revived factionalism among Tories and Whigs alike, throwing politics into confusion for the next several years. Holland shrewdly predicted a ‘revolution in parties’ that would produce either ‘a liberal ministry with an intolerant court opposition, or an intolerant court ministry with a liberal opposition’.3 Brougham urged coalition with Canning to secure a liberal government, but Grey opposed a union he thought inconsistent with Whig principles. Differences thus emerged among Whigs just as the Tories fell into their own factional quarrels.

Keywords

Corn Mercury Expense Sine Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Francis Bamford and Duke of Wellington, eds., The Journal of Mrs. Arbuthnot, 1820–32, 2 vols (London: MacMillan & Co. Ltd., 1950), I:275–6.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    N. Gash, ‘1812–30’, in How Tory Governments Fall: The Tory Party in Power Since 1783, Anthony Seldon, ed. (London: Fontana, 1996), 84–5; Hilton, ‘Political Arts of Lord Liverpool’, 165.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    Norman Gash, Lord Liverpool: The Life and Political Career of Robert Banks Jenkinson, Second Earl of Liverpool 1770–1828 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1984), 248–9.Google Scholar
  4. 13.
    Tierney’s speech, Parl. Deb., 2nd ser., 17(30 March 1827): 157–64Google Scholar
  5. 46.
    E.A. Smith, Lord Grey, 1761–1830 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990) 247.Google Scholar
  6. 48.
    Holland’s speech, Parl. Deb., 2nd ser. 17(17 May 1827):857–66.Google Scholar
  7. 68.
    Brougham, ‘state of Parties’, Edinburgh Review (October 1827): 415–32.Google Scholar
  8. 75.
    Brougham’s speech, Parl. Deb., 2nd ser. 18(29 January 1828):55.Google Scholar
  9. 77.
    Machin, ‘Resistance to Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, 1828’, Historical Journal, 22.1(1979)117–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. John Smith’s speech, Parl. Deb., 2nd ser., 18(4 February 1828):596–7; William Smith’s speech, Ibid., (6 February 1828): 124–5.Google Scholar
  11. 91.
    Wendy Hinde, Catholic Emancipation: A Shake to Men’s Minds (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 64–9.Google Scholar
  12. 103.
    J.J. Sack, ‘Wellington and the Tory Press’, in Wellington: Studies of the Political and Military Career of the First Duke of Wellington, Norman Gash, ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990), 159–68.Google Scholar
  13. 107.
    Neville Thompson, Wellington After Waterloo (London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1986), 97–8, 89.Google Scholar
  14. 114.
    Russell’s speech, Parl. Deb., 2nd ser., 22(23 February 1830):860.Google Scholar
  15. 119.
    N. Gash, ‘Brougham and the Yorkshire Election of 1830’, Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, 8(May 1956):20–1.Google Scholar
  16. 120.
    F.M.L. Thompson, ‘Whigs and Liberals in the West Riding, 1820–1832’, English Historical Review, 74.291(April 1959):215.Google Scholar
  17. 121.
    Robert Worthington Smith, ‘Political Organization and Canvassing: Yorkshire Elections Before the First Reform Bill’, American Historical Review, 74(1969):1542–3, 1547–8.Google Scholar
  18. 122.
    A.S. Turberville and Frank Beckwith, ‘Leeds and Parliamentary Reform, 1820–1832’, Publications of the Thoresby Society: Miscellany, 41.1(1943):18.Google Scholar
  19. 130.
    Fulford and Strachey, Greville Memoirs, 30 July 1830, II:18–9.Google Scholar
  20. 138.
    Gash, ‘English Reform and the French Revolution in the General Election of 1830’, in Essays Presented to Sir Lewis Namier, Richard Pares and A.J.P. Taylor, eds. (London: Macmillan, 1956), 258–88.Google Scholar
  21. R. Quinault, ‘The French Revolution of 1830 and Parliamentary Reform’, History 79(1994):377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 139.
    Henry Brougham, The Country Without a Government; or Plain Questions upon the Unhappy State of the Present Administration (London: James Ridgeway, 1830), 4–5, 9–10.Google Scholar
  23. 151.
    Henry Brougham, The Result of the General Election, or, What has the Duke of Wellington gained by the Dissolution? (London: J. Ridgway, 1830).Google Scholar
  24. 156.
    Wellington’s speech, Parl Deb., 3rd ser., 1(2 November 1830):52–3.Google Scholar
  25. 157.
    Muriel Chamberlain, Lord Aberdeen, A Political Biography (London: Longman, 1983), 252.Google Scholar
  26. 158.
    Althorp’s speech, Parl. Deb., 3rd ser., 1(2 November 1830):63–4.Google Scholar
  27. 160.
    Brougham’s speech, Parl. Deb., 3rd ser., 1(16 November 1830):562–3.Google Scholar
  28. 163.
    Lord Broughton, Recollections of a Long Life, Lady Dorchester ed., 6 vols (London: John Murray, 1909–11), IV:256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© William Anthony Hay 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Anthony Hay

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations