Abstract
‘The early seventies were a good time to be flat-chested,’ Cal recalls, remembering his adolescent girlhood in Middlesex: ‘Androgyny was in’ (p. 304). By the 1970s, androgyny was ‘an idea whose time had come’ as social scientists ‘rediscovered’ the concept.1 It wasn’t just social scientists who had rediscovered it, though: within second wave feminism and in literature, androgyny heralded the possibility of ‘a much broader range of sex-role possibilities for members of both sexes’.2 It was also perceived as the expression of ‘a psychic unity, either potential or actual, conceived as existing in all individuals’.3 Androgyny was in the head, on the body, an attitude, a way of being, in the psyche, cosmic, unisex, bisex. The ubiquity of the concept and the ways in which it was deployed have made the term a nebulous one: when we speak of androgyny, when someone is described as androgynous, when androgyny is cited as a particular aspiration, what exactly do we mean by the term, what does it describe, what are we talking about? Even a brief glance at books and articles written between the 1960s and 1990s tells us that androgyny was a protean concept whose function shifted according to the discourse that constructed it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ellen Piel Cook, Psychological Androgyny, Oxford: Pergammon, 1985, p. 15.
Barbara Charlesworth Gelpi, ‘The Politics of Androgyny’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 150.
A.J.L. Busst, ‘The Myth of the Androgyne in the Nineteenth Century’, in Ian Fletcher (ed.), Romantic Mythologies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967, p. 1.
Catharine R. Stimpson, ‘The Androgyne and the Homosexual’, in Where the Meanings Are, New York and London: Methuen, 1988, p. 54.
June Singer, Androgyny: The Opposites Within, Boston: Sigo Press, 1976, p. 11.
Grace Tiffany, Erotic Beasts and Social Monsters: Shakespeare, Jonson and Comic Androgyny, Newark: University of Delaware, 1985, p. 13.
Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father: Towards a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation London: The Women’s Press, 1973, p. 26.
Diane Long Hoeveler, Romantic Androgyny: The Women Within, University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990.
Catriona MacLeod, Embodying Ambiguity: Androgyny and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Keller, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1998, p. 16.
Carolyn Heilbrun, Towards a Recognition of Androgyny, New York and London: Harper and Row, 1973, p. 58.
Kari Weil, Androgyny and the Denial of Difference, Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 1992, p. 149.
Carolyn Heilbrun, ‘Further Notes Toward a Recognition of Androgyny’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 144.
Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, London: Women’s Press, 1979, p. 200.
Cynthia Secor, ‘The Androgyny Papers’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 141.
Camille Paglia, The Yale Review LXII:4, 1973, p. viii
Carolyun Heilbrun, Towards a Recognition of Androgyny, New York and London: Harper and Row, 1973, p. 58.
Toril Moi, Sexual/Textual Politics, London: Methuen, 1989, pp. 12–13.
Mary Anne Warren, in Mary Vetterling-Braggin, ‘Femininity’, ‘Masculinity’, and Androgyny’: A Modern Philosophical Discussion, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adam and Co., 1982, p. 170.
Margot Hentoff, ‘Growing up Androgynous’, New York Review of Books, 9 May 1968, pp. 32–3.
Catharine R. Stimpson, ‘My O My O Myra’, in Jay Parini, ed., Gore Vidal: Writer Against the Grain, London: André Deutsch, 1992, p. 192.
Nancy Topping Bazin and Alma Freeman, ‘The Androgynous Vision’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 187.
Cynthia Secor, ‘The Androgyny Papers’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 163.
Jan Morris, Conundrum, London: Penguin, 1997, p. 95.
Harold Bloom, ed., Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness, New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987, p. 9.
Lisa Rado, The Modern Androgyne Imagination: A Failed Sublime, Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2000, p. 185.
Daniel Harris, ‘Androgyny: The Sexist Myth in Disguise’, Women’s Studies 2, 1974, p. 172.
Ute Kauer, ‘Narration and Gender: The Role of the First-Person Narrator in Jeanette Winterson’s Written on the Body’, in T’m Telling You Stories’: Jeanette Winterson and the Politics of Reading, ed. Helena Grice and Tim Woods, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998, p. 41.
Chris Straayer, Deviant Eyes, Deviant Bodies: Sexual Reorientations in Film and Video, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996, p. 80.
Judith Halberstam, Female Masculinity, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1998, p. 57.
Catherine Belsey, ‘Postmodern Love: Questioning the Metaphysics of Desire’, New Fiterary History 25, 1994, p. 687.
Lisa Moore, ‘Teledildonics: Virtual Lesbians in the Fiction of Jeanette Winterson’, in Elizabeth Grosz and Elspeth Moore, eds, Sexy Bodies: The Strange Carnalities of Feminism, London: Routledge, 1995, p. 110.
Helene Cixous, ‘Sorties’, in The Newly Born Woman, Minneapolis and London: Minnesota University Press, 1986, p. 84.
Morag Shiach, Hélène Cixous: A Politics of Writing, London: Routledge, 1991, p. 17.
Kate Bornstein, Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us, London and New York: Routledge, 1994, p. 115.
Jay Prosser, Second Skins: The Body Narratives of Transsexuality, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998, p. 182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Tracy Hargreaves
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hargreaves, T. (2005). The Second Wave. In: Androgyny in Modern Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510579_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510579_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50794-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-51057-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)