Abstract

Cal, the narrator of Jeffrey Eugenides’ Middlesex, sets the record straight at the beginning of his narrative:1 ‘Something you should understand: Em not androgynous in the least’ (p. 41).2 Cal rejects androgyny in favour of scientific exactitude: ‘5-alpha-reductase deficiency syndrome allows for normal biosynthesis and peripheral action of testosterone, in utero, neonatally, and at puberty’ (p. 41), There is no ambiguity: ‘I operate in society as a man’ (p. 41). His repudiation of androgyny is a refusal to live with gender or sexual ambiguity, and once his hermaphrodite status has been revoked, his (masculine) femininity can be sloughed off. Cal, as Calliope, was biologically hermaphrodite, and towards the conclusion of his story, Plato’s Symposium is cited by Cal’s new friend, Zora, who offers him an alternative explanatory narrative to the scientific category ‘5-Alpha-Reductase Pseudohermaphrodites’:

There have been hermaphrodites around forever, Cal. Forever. Plato said that the original human being was a hermaphrodite. Did you know that? The original person was two halves, one male, one female. Then these got separated. That’s why everybody’s always searching for their other half. Except for us. We’ve got both halves already.3

Keywords

Testosterone Posit Stake Lawson Culmination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Jeffrey Eugenides, Middlesex, London: Bloomsbury, 2002, p. 41.Google Scholar
  2. Robert Kimbrough, Shakespeare and the Art of Humankindness, New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1990, p. 20.Google Scholar
  3. Mary Anne Warren, ‘Androgyny, in this feminist sense, has nothing to do with physical hermaphroditism, a biological anomaly in which a person’s body fails to develop in an unambiguously feminine or masculine manner.’ ‘Is Androgyny the Answer to Sexual Stereotyping?’ in Mary Vetterling-Braggin, ‘Femininity’, ‘Masculinity’, and ‘Androgyny’: A Modern Philosophical Discussion, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adam and Co., 1982, p. 170.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kari Weil, Androgyy and the Denial of Difference, Charlottesville and London: Virginia University Press, 1990, p. 10Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helene Cixous, ‘Sorties’, The Newly Born Woman, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, p. 84Google Scholar
  6. Victor Burgin et al., eds, Formations of Fantasy, London and New York: Routledge, 1986, p. 66)Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Jeffrey Eugenides in interview with Geraldine Bedell, The Observer, 6 October 2002, p. 17.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Michael Joyce, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns Bollinger, Series LXXI, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963Google Scholar
  9. Walter Hamilton, The Symposium, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1951Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catriona MacLeod, Embodying Ambiguity: Androgyny and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Keller, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1998, p. 11.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Olive Schreiner, Woman and Labour, London: Virago, 1978, pp. 250–1.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Diana Collecott, HD and Sapphic Modernism 1910–1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 p. 94.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Havelock Ellis, Studies in the Psychology of Sex, vol. II, Philadelphia: F.H. Davies, 1917, p. 311.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    D.H. Lawrence, Women in Love, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995, p. 201.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Thomas Hardy, Tess of the d’Urbervilles, London: Macmillan, 1974, p. 72.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    Jacques Lacan, ‘From Love to the Libido’, in The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, ed. Jacques Alain Miller, trans. Alan Sheridan, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977, p. 197Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Catharine R. Stimpson, ‘The Androgyne and the Homosexual’, in Where the Meanings Are, New York and London: Methuen, 1988, p. 56.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    Hari Kunzru, The Impressionist, London: Hamish Hamilton, 2002, pp. 92 and 256.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Philip Roth, The Human Stain, London: Vintage, 2001, p. 156.Google Scholar
  20. 28.
    Edward and Eleanor Marx-Aveling, The Woman Question, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1886, p. 7.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    Camille Paglia, ‘The Beautiful Boy as Destroyer: Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray’, in Sexual Personae, New York: Vintage Books, 1991, pp. 512–30.Google Scholar
  22. 30.
    Angela Carter, in ‘Angela Carter’s Curious Room’, Omnibus, BBC1, 15 September 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tracy Hargreaves 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy Hargreaves
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EnglishUniversity of LeedsUK

Personalised recommendations