Childbirth

  • Tanya Evans

Abstract

Up until the eighteenth century, women had dominated the culture of childbirth. The vast majority of mothers gave birth within their own homes using midwives recommended to them by family, friends and neighbours.1 These midwives were usually mature married or widowed women who had had children themselves.2 The rituals of childbirth and churching, where women would mark the end of their lying-in period with a religious ceremony of thanks, were practised by women regardless of social status.3 Between 1747 and 1767, the culture and experience of childbirth changed for many women as religious, social, mercantilist and humanitarian motives combined to contribute to the establishment of seven institutions dedicated to the delivery of poor pregnant women in London, and as upper-class women began to use male physicians during their deliveries. The voluntary hospital movement was just one element of the new philanthropic endeavours of the mid-eighteenth century.4 Plebeian mothers entered the public imagination of Britain and Europe as populationist concerns swept through the corridors of power.5

Keywords

Europe Income Assure Black Ball Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    D. Evenden, ‘Mothers and their Midwives in Seventeenth-Century London’, in H. Marland (ed.), The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe (London, 1993), p. 14Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Wilson, The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth in England, 1660–1770 (London, 1995), p. 30.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    D. Owen, English Philanthropy 1660–1960 (London, 1965), p. 36.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    J. Donnison, Midwives and Medical Men: A History of the Struggle for the Control of Childbirth (London, 1977), p. 25.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    J. Nicols, A Sermon Preached before… the President and Governors of the City of London Lying-in Hospital (London, 1767), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. 17.
    A. Gunn, ‘Maternity Hospitals’, in F.N.L. Poynter (ed.), The Evolution of Hospitals in Britain (London, 1964), p. 96.Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    D. Andrew, ‘Noblesse Oblige: Female Charity in an Age of Sentiment’, in J. Brewer and S. Staves (eds), Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London, 1995), p. 277.Google Scholar
  8. 42.
    V. Fildes, Breasts, Bottles and Babies: A History of Infant Feeding (Edinburgh, 1986), pp. 86, 106.Google Scholar
  9. 90.
    A. Kussmaul, Servants in Husbandry in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1981), p. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 92.
    B. Hill, Women, Work and Sexual Politics in Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1994), pp. 137–138Google Scholar
  11. 98.
    D. Andrew, ‘Noblesse Oblige: Female Charity in an Age of Sentiment’, in J. Brewer and S. Staves (eds), Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London, 1995), p. 277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tanya Evans 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanya Evans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations