Abstract
The amusing quote above might lead one to conclude that business managers are the unwitting dupes of unscrupulous academics and consultants selling snake oil. Yet the major argument in this volume, which reports the findings from a survey of the use and performance of business management tools and techniques across 237 firms in 16 different industrial sectors, is that managers are not always as gullible as some may believe (Micklethwaite & Wooldridge, 1996). Indeed, the research reported here shows that there is a definite link between the willingness of managers to use management tools and techniques and the risks that have to be managed given the functions and the types of industry sectors that they operate in. This implies that there is evidence of practitioners being able to understand when specific tools and techniques are appropriate (the right tools for the job) and also when they are not (the wrong tools for the job).
‘Imagine going to your doctor because you are not feeling well. Before you’ve had a chance to describe your symptoms, the doctor writes out a prescription and says, “Take two of these three times a week and call me next week”’.
“But — I haven’t told you what’s wrong”, you say. “How do I know this will help me?”
“Why wouldn’t it?” says the doctor. “It worked for the last two patients”.
No competent doctors would ever practice medicine like this, nor would any sane patient accept it if they did. Yet professors and consultants routinely prescribe such generic advice, and managers routinely accept such therapy, in the naïve belief that if a particular course of action helped other companies to succeed, it ought to help their’s, too’.
Christensen & Raynor (2003), p. 67.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamson, E. (1996) ‘Management Fashion’ Academy of Management Review, 21(1).
Abrahamson, E. & Fairchild, G. (1999) ‘Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 44.
Brindle, M. & Stearns, P. (2001) Facing Up to Management Faddism: A New Look At an Old Face, West Point, US and London, UK.
Cox, A. (1997) Business Success (Helpston, UK: Earlsgate Press).
Cox, A. et al. (2001) ‘The Power Perspective in Procurement and Supply Management’, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, Spring.
Cox, A. et al. (2002) Supply Chains, Markets and Power: Mapping Buyer and Supplier Power Regimes, London: Routledge.
Cox, A. et al. (2003) Supply Chain Management: A Guide to Best Practice, London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Cox, A. et al. (2004a) Business Relationships for Competitive Advantage, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cox A. et al. (2004b) ‘Power Regimes and Supply Chain Management’, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, October.
Cox, A., Sanderson, J. & Watson, G. (2000), Power Regimes: Mapping the DNA of Business and Supply Chain Relationships (Helpston, UK: Earlsgate Press).
Chandler, A. D. (1962) Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christensen, C. & Raynor, M. (2003) ‘Why Hard-Nosed Executives Should Care About Management Theory’ Harvard Business Review, September.
Collins, D. (2000) Management Fads and Buzzwords: Critical-Practical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1993) ‘Strategy as Stretch and Leverage’, Harvard Business Review, March/April.
Micklethwaite, J. & Wooldridge, A. (1996) The Witch Doctors, London: Heinemann.
O’Shea, J. & Madigan, C. (1997) Dangerous Company: Management Consultants and the Businesses They Save and Ruin, New York: Time Books.
Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
Spell, C. (2001) ‘Management Fashions: Where Do They Come from, and Are They Old Wine in New Bottles?’ Journal of Management Enquiry, 10(4).
Whittington, R. (2000) What is Strategy and Does it Matter? London: Thomson Learning.
Willer, D. & WiIler, J. (1973) Systematic Empiricism: A Critique of a Pseudo-Science, New York: Prentice Hall.
Copyright information
© 2005 Andrew Cox, Chris Lonsdale, Joe Sanderson and Glyn Watson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, A., Lonsdale, C., Sanderson, J., Watson, G. (2005). The Case For and Against the Use of Management Tools and Techniques. In: The Right Tools for the Job. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509207_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509207_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51421-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50920-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)