Skip to main content

The Origins of British Counter-Espionage

  • Chapter
  • 116 Accesses

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

In 1870, the imperial French government of Napoleon III declared war on Prussia and her allies, but the Germans quickly annihilated the French army, invaded France, captured the emperor himself, and eventually conquered Paris. On 28 January 1871, French General de Valdan signed an armistice.1 Eleven days later, a British officer, Colonel George Tomkyns Chesney, submitted the outline of a short story entitled The Battle of Dorking to Blackwood’s Magazine where it was published soon afterwards.2 Chesney’s tale describes a successful German invasion of England, culminating in the rout and defeat of the British army at Dorking. Through the character of a veteran recalling the disaster for his grandchildren fifty years after the event, Chesney presented an invasion whose ‘coming was foreshadowed plainly enough to open our eyes, if we had not been wilfully blind’.3 His message was straightforward. A false sense of security and lack of preparedness had caused British failure. The story, subsequently reprinted in more accessible book form, adopted the moral imperative of shaking the British people from national indolence.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michael Howard, The Franco-Prussian War: The German Invasion of France, 1870–1871, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2001), p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sir George T. Chesney, The Battle of Dorking: Reminiscences of a Volunteer (1871; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ignatius F. Clarke, ‘The Battle of Dorking, 1871–1914’, Victorian Studies, 8 (June 1965), pp. 316f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On Le Queux, see Norman St. Barbe Sladen, The Real Le Queux: The Official Biography of William Le Queux (London: Nicholson & Watson, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  5. William Tufnell Le Queux, The Great War in England in 1897 (London: Tower Publishing, 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  6. William Tufnell Le Queux, England’s Peril: A Story of the Secret Service (London: F.V. White, 1899).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrew Boyle, The Riddle of Erskine Childers (London: Hutchinson, 1977), p. 134

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erskine Childers, The Riddle of the Sands (1903; London: Penguin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maldwin Drummond, The Riddle (London: Macmillan, 1985), p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas Fergusson, British Military Intelligence, 1870–1914: The Development of a Modem Intelligence Organization (London: Arms & Armour Press, 1984), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Gooch, The Prospect of War: Studies in British Defence Policy 1847–1942 (London: Frank Cass, 1981), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. John P. Mackintosh, ‘The Role of the Committee of Imperial Defence before 1914’, English Historical Review, 77 (1962), p. 494.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicholas Hiley, ‘Decoding German Spies: British Spy Fiction 1908–1918’, in Wesley K. Wark (ed.), Spy Fiction, Spy Films and Real Intelligence (London: Frank Cass, 1991), pp. 58f. Predictably, this investigation led to nothing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Howard, The Continental Commitment: The Dilemma of British Defence Policy in the Era of Two World Wars (London: Maurice Temple Smith, 1972), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samuel Hynes, The Edwardian Turn of Mind (Princeton and London: Princeton University Press and Oxford University Press, 1968), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peter Padfield, The Great Naval Race: The Anglo-German Rivalry 1900–1914 (London: Hart-Davis, MacGibbon, 1974), p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  17. David James, Lord Roberts: A Biography (London: Hollis & Carter, 1954), p. 424.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.J.Q. Adams, ‘The National Service League and Mandatory Service in Edwardian Britain’, Armed Forces and Society, 12 (1985), p. 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R.J.Q. Adams, The Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–1918 (London: Macmillan, 1987), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howard Weinroth, ‘Left-Wing Opposition to Naval Armaments in Britain before 1914’, Journal of Contemporary History, 6 (1971), p. 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Michael Ryan, ‘The Invasion Controversy of 1906–1908: Lieutenant-Colonel Charles à Court Repington and British Perceptions of the German Menace’, Military Affairs, 44 (1980), p. 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Edward Spiers, Haldane: An Army Reformer (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1980), p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruddock F. Mackay, Fisher of Kilverstone (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 382.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andrew Morris, The Scaremongers: The Advocacy of War and Rearmament, 1896–1914 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), pp. 136–8, 158.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stephen E. Koss, Haldane: Scapegoat for Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a discussion of the play, and its political context, see Nicholas Hiley, ‘The Play, the Parody, the Censor and the Film’, Intelligence and National Security, 6, 1 (1991), pp. 218–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. John Gooch, The Plans of War: The General Staff and British Military Strategy c. 1900–1916 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974), p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nicholas Hiley, ‘The Failure of British Counter-Espionage against Germany, 1907–1914’, The Historical Journal, 28, 4 (December 1985), pp. 835f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sladen, Le Queux, pp. 182f.; William Le Queux, Things I Know about Kings, Celebrities and Crooks (London: E. Nash & Grayson, 1923), p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jean Graham Hall and F. Douglas Martin, Haldane: Statesman, Lawyer; Philosopher (Chichester: Barry Rose Law, 1996), p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  31. PRO, CAB 16/8, ‘Conclusions of the subcommittee of the Committee of Imperial Defence’, p. 4: ‘By means of this Bureau our Naval and Military Attachés and Government officials would not only be freed from the necessity of dealing with spies, but direct evidence could not be obtained that we were having any dealings with them.’ See also Bernard Porter, Plots and Paranoia: A History of Political Espionage in Britain, 1790–1988 (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 123–34. Basil Thomson, the head of the Special Branch of Scotland Yard, denounced humanitarians as ‘subhuman’.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Winston S. Churchill, The World Crisis (5 vols, London: Thornton Butterworth, 1927–1929), 1, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Thomas Boghardt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boghardt, T. (2004). The Origins of British Counter-Espionage. In: Spies of the Kaiser. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508422_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508422_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51611-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50842-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics