‘The Spoils of Virtue’: Mantua-makers, Milliners and their Shops

  • Jennie Batchelor

Abstract

The moral, sexual and social debates provoked by the ‘Story’ of Pamela’s dress were not confined to writing on servants. In many ways, mantua-makers and milliners constituted much more alarming figures than servants, though all three groups of labouring women were commonly attributed with similar characteristics — pride, social ambition and a lack of moral refinement — by writers and artists. As active agents in the burgeoning consumer economy, rather than its mere beneficiaries, women who worked in the dressmaking trades became vehicles through which critics could debate the changes in social and cultural production wrought by the commercialisation of fashion.1 Fashioning much more than cloth and trimmings, these women controversially reformulated notions of gender itself. By the end of the eighteenth century, as Clare Haru Crowston has demonstrated, women in the clothing trades had helped to redefine the sexual division of labour and had effectively consolidated the supposedly innate connection between femininity and fashion.2 Their progress did not go uncontested, however. Many critics vociferously opposed the rise of mantua-makers on the grounds that they had unfairly encroached upon the trade of tailors, who had traditionally made both female and male costume.3

Keywords

Assure Expense Tated Bleach Lost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For a more detailed analysis of these changes, see Jennifer Jones, ‘Coquettes and Grisettes: Women Buying and Selling in the Old Regime’, in The Sex of Things: Gender and Consumption in Historical Perspective, ed. Victoria de Grazia with Ellen Furlough (Berkeley, LA and London: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 25–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clare Haru Crowston, Fabricating Women: The Seamstresses of Old Regime France, 1675–1791 (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2001), p. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwarz has argued that the fears provoked by women’s usurpation of labour traditionally undertaken by tailors was an important impetus in the movement to establish tailors’ unions in the mid-century. L. D. Schwarz, London in the Age of Industrialisation: Entrepreneurs, Labour Force and Living Conditions, 1700–1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    On the threat labour posed to conceptions of domestic femininity, see Nancy Armstrong, Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 78–81.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    See Christina Walkley, The Ghost in the Looking Glass (London: Peter Owen, 1981);Google Scholar
  6. and Lynn M. Alexander, ‘Creating a Symbol: The Seamstress in Victorian Fiction’, Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 18: 1 (1999) 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 11.
    Tony Henderson, Disorderly Women in Eighteenth-Century London: Prostitution Control in the Metropolis, 1730–1830 (London and New York: Longman, 1999), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    John Cleland, Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure, ed. Peter Sabor (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 93–4.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. Miriam Brody (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992), p. 267.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Taking my lead from Elizabeth Kowaleski-Wallace, I am reading these texts not as ‘the key to a historical understanding of the period, but to how an age discursively constructed its understanding of itself’. Elizabeth Kowaleski-Wallace, Consuming Subjects: Women, Shopping and Business in the Eighteenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), p. 116.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    Such studies include Laura Brown, Ends of Empire: Women and Ideology in Early Eighteenth-Century Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  12. Erin Mackie, Market à la Mode: Fashion, Commodity and Gender in The Tatler and The Spectator (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  13. A. Kowaleski-Wallace, Consuming Subjects; and Deidre Shauna Lynch, The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998), particularly pp. 165–206.Google Scholar
  14. 24.
    Lynda M. Thompson, The ‘Scandalous Memoirists’: Constantia Philips, Laetitia Pilkington and the Shame of ‘Publick Fame’ (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 81.Google Scholar
  15. 28.
    Kimberly Chrisman Campbell, ‘The Face of Fashion: Milliners in Eighteenth-Century Visual Culture’, British Journal of Eighteenth-Century Studies, 25:2 (2002), p. 163.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Eliza Haywood, The History of Miss Betsy Thoughtless, ed. Beth Fowkes Tobin (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 11. SubsequentGoogle Scholar
  17. 30.
    As Deborah J. Nestor points out, the novel refuses to resolve the seduction/rape question. Though Miss Forward meets Wildly of her own free will, and is clearly attracted to him, the physical force he exerts over her in the seduction/rape scene is stressed in the account Miss Forward gives to Betsy. See Nestor, ‘Virtue Rarely Rewarded: Ideological Subversion and Narrative Form in Haywood’s Later Fiction’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 34: 3 (1994), p. 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 31.
    Oliver Goldsmith, Citizen of the World, reprinted in Collected Works of Oliver Goldsmith, ed. Arthur Friedman, 5 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966), II, p. 320.Google Scholar
  19. 35.
    Frances Burney, Camilla: or, a Picture of Youth, ed. Edward A. Bloom and Lillian D. Bloom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 688.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    See Janet Todd, The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction, 1660–1800 (London: Virago, 1989), p. 146;Google Scholar
  21. and Jane Spencer, The Rise of the Woman Novelist: From Aphra Behn to Jane Austen (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), p. 141.Google Scholar
  22. 39.
    Catherine Ingrassia, Authorship, Commerce and Gender in Early Eighteenth-Century England: A Culture of Paper Credit (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 129.Google Scholar
  23. 40.
    Pin-money offered women a modicum of financial independence after marriage in the form of an allowance for expenses, particularly for fabrics and dress, often secured in a pre-nuptial contract. See Susan Staves, ‘Pin Money’, Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 14 (1985) 47–77.Google Scholar
  24. 44.
    For a discussion of Sarah Young, see Patricia Crown, ‘Hogarth’s Working Women: Commerce and Consumption’, in The Other Hogarth: Aesthetics of Difference, ed. Bernadette Fort and Angela Rosenthal (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), pp. 224–39.Google Scholar
  25. 45.
    Vivien Jones, ‘Placing Jemima: Women Writers of the 1790s and the Eighteenth-Century Prostitution Narrative’, Women’s Writing, 4: 2 (1997) 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 46.
    For historical accounts of the decline in employment opportunities for women in the eighteenth century, see Ivy Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850 (London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd., 1930);Google Scholar
  27. and Bridget Hill, Women, Work, and Sexual Politics in England (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar
  28. 47.
    Frances Burney, Evelina: or, the History of a Young Ladies Entrance into the World, ed. Edward A. Bloom and Lillian D. Bloom (Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1998). p. 27.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    In John O’ Keeffe’s play, The Man Milliner, for example, the title character is a grotesque, effeminate man. Like his female counterparts he sets himself up as a matchmaker for his clients (although, unlike his female counterparts, he is a very unsuccessful one) in the hopes of financial reward. The Man-Milliner, in Two Acts. Performed at the Theatre-Royal, Covent-Garden in 1787, in John O’Keeffe, The Dramatic Works of John O’Keeffe, Esq., IV (London: T. Woodfall, 1798).Google Scholar
  30. 50.
    Frances Burney, 22 January 1780, Diary and Letters of Madame D’Arblay, ed. Charlotte Barrett (London: Bickers and Son, 1876), p. 210.Google Scholar
  31. 51.
    Kristina Straub, Divided Fictions: Fanny Burney and Feminine Strategy (Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky, 1987), p. 191.Google Scholar
  32. 52.
    Letter to Charles Burney, 13 August 1779. Frances Burney (2001), Journals and Letters, ed. Peter Sabor, Lars E. Troide, Stewart Cooke and Victoria Kortes-Papp (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2001), p. 128.Google Scholar
  33. Between August 1779 and the beginning of 1780, Burney would extensively revise the play. Later in her career she resurrected some of the characters from her earlier play in The Woman-Hater, written between 1800 and 1802. On the suppression of The Witlings and its later revision as The Woman-Hater, see Peter Sabor and Geoffrey Sill’s ‘Introduction’ to The Witlings and Woman-Hater (London: Pickering and Chatto, 1997), pp. x–xxxv.Google Scholar
  34. 53.
    Frances Burney, The Witlings, ed. Clayton J. Delery (East Lansing, MI: Colleag ues Press, 1995), p. 31 Subsequent references will be given, parenthetically, in the text.Google Scholar
  35. 54.
    This view would be uncomfortably confirmed by personal experience when Burney became the ‘Keeper of the Robes of Queen Charlotte’ in 1786. As someone who hated sewing, the weekly task of stitching caps and restoring petticoats for the full-court dress worn on Thursday afternoons as St. James’s Palace was a particularly trying experience for Burney. Kate Chisholm, Fanny Burney: Her Life (London: Vintage, 1999), p. 140.Google Scholar
  36. 56.
    Barbara Darby, Frances Burney, Dramatist: Gender, Performance and the Late Eighteenth-Century Stage (Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky, 1997), p. 40.Google Scholar
  37. 58.
    Frances Burney, The Wanderer: or, Female Difficulties, ed. Margaret Anne Doody, Robert Mack and Peter Sabor (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 11. Subsequent references will be given, parenthetically, in the text.Google Scholar
  38. 59.
    Margaret Anne Doody, Frances Burney: The Life in the Works (Cambridge, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne and Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 355.Google Scholar
  39. 61.
    Rozsika Parker, The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine (London: The Women’s Press, 1996), p. 11.Google Scholar
  40. 63.
    Edward Copeland, Women Writing About Money: Women’s Fiction in England, 1790–1820 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 162–3.Google Scholar
  41. 64.
    For a discussion reassessing the importance of the conflict between Elinor and Juliet to Burney’s novel and its politics see Andrea Austin, ‘Between Two Women: Frances Burney’s The Wanderer’, English Studies in Canada, 22:3 (1996) 253–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jennie Batchelor 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennie Batchelor
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EnglishUniversity of KentUK

Personalised recommendations