Skip to main content

The Growth of Biological Warfare Research

  • Chapter
Britain and Biological Warfare

Abstract

What would happen to the British biological warfare programme after the Second World War? It was by no means obvious that research would continue. The anthrax cattle cakes and the rudimentary bomb were significant for their originality, but were nonetheless relatively modest achievements when compared with other wartime technologies such as atomic bombs, radar or operations research. Germany had neither employed biological warfare nor treated their research programme with any seriousness. Furthermore, as this chapter describes, many staff at the Biology Department Porton returned to civilian employment leaving the new Superintendent, David Henderson, with a struggling and emaciated organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Harris, R. and Paxman, J. (1982) A Higher Form of Killing: the Secret Story of Gas and Germ Warfare (London: Chatto and Windus).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Falk, Richard (1990) ‘Inhibiting Reliance on Biological Weaponry: the Role and Relevance of International Law’, in Wright, S. (ed.) Preventing a Biological Arms Race (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press) pp. 240–66;

    Google Scholar 

  3. McElroy, R.J. (1991) ‘The Geneva Protocol of 1925’, in Krepon, M. and Caldwell, D. (eds) The Politics of Arms Control Treaty Ratification (New York: St Martin’s Press — now Palgrave) pp. 125–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. PRO, WO188/667. BW(47)32. Chiefs of Staff Committee, BW Subcommittee, Division of Responsibilities (3 November 1947). See also Johnson, F.A. (1980) Defence by Ministry (London: Duckworth) for a more general account of the organization of Government defence.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edgerton, D. (1992) ‘Whatever Happened to the British Warfare State? The Ministry of Supply 1945–1951’ in Mercer, H., Rollings, N. and Tomlinson, J.D. (eds) Labour Governments and Private Industry: the Experience 1945–1951 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  6. PRO, WO188/667. BW(47)32. Chiefs of Staff Committee, BW Subcommittee, Division of Responsibilities (3 November 1947). See Agar, Jon and Balmer, Brian (1998) ‘British Scientists and the Cold War: the Defence Policy Research Committee and Information Networks, 1947–1963’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 28, 209–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For a general discussion of this theme see Jasanoff, J. (1987) ‘Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science’, Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. also Krige, J. (1990) ‘Scientists as Policymakers: British Physicists “Advice” to Their Government on Membership of CERN (1951–1952)’ in Frängsmyr, T. (ed.) Solomon’s House Revisited: the Organization and Institutionalization of Science (Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications USA) pp. 270–91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agar, J. and Balmer, B. (1998) ‘British Scientists and the Cold War: the Defence Policy Research Committee and Information Networks, 1947–1963’, Historical Studies in the Physicial Sciences, 28, 209–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The commission had been established on 24 January 1946 to deal with ‘the elimination from national armaments of atomic weapons and all other major weapons adaptable to mass destruction’. See SPRI (1971) The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Vol. IV: CB Disarmament Negotiations 1920–1970 (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Carter, G. (1992) Porton Down: 75 Years of Chemical and Biological Research (London: HMSO); PRO, WO 195/11643. AC11647/BRB91. BRAB. Report by the Chairman on the Work of the Board during 1951 (10 November 1951).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Brian Balmer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balmer, B. (2001). The Growth of Biological Warfare Research. In: Britain and Biological Warfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508095_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics