Abstract
One way of distinguishing between different moral theories, which has been popular in recent years, is to distinguish between theories that are outcome-based (the chief example being consequentialism), agent-based (e.g. deontology) and character-based (referring usually to Aristotle and virtue ethics). Whether this distinction is viable and/or useful is an issue which will be discussed within the wider context of moral luck.1 However, for our present purposes we can start by accepting that Aristotelian theory is indeed character-based and proceed from there to see how this affects the Aristotelian answer to the problem of moral luck. The process of answering this question will also eventually explain what is meant by a character-based theory and how, if in any way, such a theory differs from other alternatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 Nafsika Athanassoulis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Athanassoulis, N. (2005). Aristotle on Constitutive Luck. In: Morality, Moral Luck and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508040_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508040_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51788-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50804-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)