Neotraditionalism in International Relations

  • Alexander Astrov

Abstract

I have outlined an idea of tradition as a conversation between two modes of inquiry, practice and history, in terms of which conduct inter homines can be understood. Conversation is not a formally structured mode of understanding, like history or practice themselves, but an engagement pointing towards the absolute presuppositions of the condition of modernity. Thus tradition necessarily overflows the modes of experience that constitute it, and this excess is what makes it possible to recognize the conclusions and the presuppositions of practical and historical understanding as being questionable. As a non-instrumental practice, authoritative in its character but not formalized through the institution of a centralized set of authoritative offices, tradition constitutes what the classical approach in International Relations described (without really defining) as world society and understood as a moral ground for the operation of international order.

Keywords

Manifold Europe Assure Posit Dition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    H. Kissinger, A World Restored: Europe After Napoleon (Gloucester: Peter Smith, 1973): 329.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid.: 322.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Morgenthau, ‘Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State’, Encounter, November 1974: 61.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Žižek, The Fragile Absolute: Or Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? (London: Verso, 2000): 160.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    F. Kafka, Complete Short Stories (London: Vintage, 1999): 243.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Plato’s remark from Laws cited by Arendt who, on that occasion, did not believe such beginnings to be alive in the Western political tradition; Between Past and Future (London: Penguin Books, 1968): 18.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    M. Heidegger, Being and Time (Oxford: Blackwell, 1962): 437.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    J.-L. Nancy, ‘The Girl Who Succeeds the Muses’, in The Muses (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996): 46.Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    Nancy, The Sense of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993): 165.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    Agamben, Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive (New York: Zone Books, 1999): 18, 20–21.Google Scholar
  11. 29.
    Nancy, The Sense of the World: 108.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    Agamben, Means Without Ends: Notes On Politics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000): 111–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alexander Astrov 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Astrov
    • 1
  1. 1.Central European UniversityHungary

Personalised recommendations