Skip to main content

Communities, Trust and Organisational Responses to Local Governance Failure

  • Chapter
Trust, Risk and Uncertainty

Abstract

Trust is a key element in all social relationships. In this chapter we look at how the level of trust affects the relationship between citizens, service users and the public sector, understood as both elected politicians and the professional bureaucracies which are engaged to carry out the wishes of dominant political groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audit Commission (2003), ‘Trust in Public Bodies Hinges on Service Quality and Honesty, Says New Research’. Press release, 10 June. London: Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. M. (2003), ‘Creating Trust? A Critical Perspective on Intra- and Inter-organisational Reforms’. Paper to the European Group of Public Administration Annual Conference, Oeiras, Portugal, 3–6 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B. and J. K. Kampen. (2002), Identity vs. Performance: An Overview of Theories Explaining Trust in Government: Second Report ‘Citizen Directed Governance: Quality and Trust in Government’, Leuven: Public Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G. and van de Walle, S. (2003), ‘Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of “Good Governance”: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators’, International Review ofAdministrative Sciences, 69(3): 329–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (1986), ‘Public and Private Partnerships for Financing Urban Programme’, in E. A. Rose (ed.), New Roles for Old Cities, Aldershot: Gower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. and Diez, S. P. (2002), ‘Finding a Bowling Partner: The Role of Stakeholders in Activating Civil Society in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom’, Public Management Review, 4(3): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. S. and Luks, S. (2001), ‘Political Trust Revisited: Deja Vu All Over Again’, in J. R. Hibbing and E. Theiss-Morse (eds.), What is it About Government that Americans Dislike? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1995), The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —(1998), The New Golden Rule. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —(2000), The Third Way to a Good Society. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (2000), ‘Motivation and Human Behavior’, in P. Taylor-Goodby (ed.), Risk, Trust and Welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (1996), Trust in Organisations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E. (2003), ‘Governance and Government — Networking with External Stake-holders’, in T. Bovaird and E. Loeffler (eds.), Public Management and Governance. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1999), Tillid-en mekanisme til reduktion afsocial kompleksitet. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag; cited in A. M. Berg (2003) ‘Creating Trust? A Critical Perspective on Intra- and Inter-organisational Reforms’. Paper to the European Group of Public Administration Annual Conference, Oeiras, Portugal, 3–6 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2003), ‘Engaging with Citizens and Other Stakeholders’ in T. Bovaird and E. Loeffler (eds), Public Management and Governance, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miztal, B. A. (1996), Trust in Modem Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2002), ‘The New Public Management, Modernization and Institutional Change: Disruptions, Disjunctures and Dilemmas’, in K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne and E. Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D. and Kings, D. C. (eds.), Why People Dont Trust Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R. (2003), Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri 6, Leat, D., Seltzer, K. and Stoker, G. (2002), Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda„ Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S. and Putnam, R. (2000), Disaffected Democracies: Whats Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modem Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J and Weber, M. M. (1973), ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning’, Policy Sciences 4: 155–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, C. (1968), The Politics and Economics ofPublic Spending, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2000), ‘The Social Relations of Care’, in G. Lewis, S. Gerwitz and J. Clarke (eds.), Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Goodby, P. (2000), ‘Risk and Welfare’, in P. Taylor-Goodby (ed.), Risk, Trust and Welfare, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Tony Bovaird and Elke Loeffler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2005). Communities, Trust and Organisational Responses to Local Governance Failure. In: Watson, S., Moran, A. (eds) Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506039_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics