Skip to main content

Managing Uncertainty and Subjectivity

  • Chapter
Trust, Risk and Uncertainty

Abstract

The idea that organisations are facing uncertainty is not a new one. Three themes dominate the discussion in the current literature on organisations — environmental, structural and managerial uncertainty. First, the demise of a stable business environment due to globalisation and technological advances has signalled the uncertain competitive landscape facing organisations. Second, the demise of bureaucracy and hierarchy has signalled the rise of uncertainty in terms of organisation structure. Third, the loss of certainties in terms of knowledge has signalled the rise of uncertainty in terms of managerial decision-making. These themes have been articulated in the organisational literature since the 1960s (see Burns and Stalker, 1961). However, there has been an increasing emphasis in recent years on the implications of uncertainty for the subjectivity of organisational participants. Environmental, structural and managerial uncertainties are discussed not only in terms of their impact on organisations, but also in terms of the identity of organisational participants. These discussions suggest that organisational participants are engaged in ‘managing’ the uncertainty in terms of their subjectivity and identity (Grey, 1994; Townley, 1995; du Gay, 1996). While questions concerning work-based identities are not new, the current discussions argue that organisational participants have become ‘enterprising managers’ of themselves and their work lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burns, T. and Stalker, G. (1961), The Management ofInnovation, London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1995), ‘Character, Corporate Responsibility and the Dialogic in the Postmodern Context: A Commentary on Mangham’, Organisation, 2(2): 217–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P. (1996), Consumption and Identity at Work, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P. and Salaman, G. (1992), ‘The Cult[ure] of the Consumer’, Journal of Management Studies, 29(5): 615–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P., Salaman, G. and B. Rees (1996), ‘The Conduct of Management and the Management of Conduct: Contemporary Managerial Discourse and the Constitution of the “Competent” Manager’, Journal of Management Studies, 33(3): 263–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, II. (1971), ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy, 67(1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garsten, C. and Grey, C. (1997), ‘How to Become Oneself: Discourses of Subjectivity in Post-bureaucratic Organisations’, Organisation, 4(2): 211–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (1994), ‘Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline’, Sociology, 28(2): 479–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heelas, P. (1991), ‘Reforming the Self: Enterprise and the Characters of Thatcherism’, in R. Keat and N. Abercrombie (eds), Enterprise Culture, London: Routledge, pp. 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R. (1988), Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, A. (1985), After Virtue, second edition, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990), ‘Governing Economic Life’, Economy and Society, 22(2): 171–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L. L. (1995), ‘Whose Character? A Response to Mangham’s “Maclntyre and the Manager”’, Organisation, 2(2): 226–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. (2003), Capitalism is Dead: Peoplism Rules, London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985), Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —(1989), Sources of Self The Making of the Modern Identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1995), ‘Know Thyself: Self-awareness, Self-formation and Managing’, Organisation, 2(2): 271–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1996), ‘How Do Managers Think? Morality and Pragmatism in Theory and Practice’, Management Learning, 27(3): 323–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —(1998), ‘Ethical Codes and Moral Communities: The Gunlaw Temptation, the Simon Solution and the David Dilemma’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics and Organisations, London: Sage, pp. 251–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Ajit Nayak

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nayak, A. (2005). Managing Uncertainty and Subjectivity. In: Watson, S., Moran, A. (eds) Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506039_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics