Advertisement

Trust, Risk and Expert Systems: Child Protection, Modernity and the (Changing) Management of Life and Death

  • Harry Ferguson

Abstract

The dynamics of trust and risk take different forms in relation to different social issues and sites of social life. A striking feature of this is that children have become key subjects around whom contemporary obsessions with risk are focused (Jackson and Scott, 1999). From the predatory paedophile to the ‘cruel’ parent who abuses and kills their child, child abuse and risk now have a compelling hold on the popular imagination and public policy. A vital feature of this situation is that the focus is not simply on the tragedy of child abuse and death itself, but the relationship between trust and risk and the experts and professional systems that work with the problem.

Keywords

Child Abuse Expert System Child Sexual Abuse Child Protection Public Disclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aries, P. (1974), Western Attitudes toward Death: From the Middle Ages to the Present, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (1992), Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. —(1994), ‘The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. —(1995), Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002), Individualization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986), Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler-Sloss, Lord Justice, E. (1988), Report of the Inquiry Into Child Abuse in Cleveland1987, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Cawson, P., Wattam, C., Brooker, S. and Kelly, G. (2000), Child Maltreatment in the United Kingdom, NSPCC: London.Google Scholar
  11. Chaney, D. (2002), Cultural Change and Everyday Life, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Corby, B. (2000), Child Abuse: Towards a Knowledge Base, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dempster, H. (1993), ‘The Aftermath of Child Sexual Abuse: Women’s Perspectives’, in L. Waterhouse (ed.), Child Abuse and Child Abusers, Protection and Prevention, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Health and Social Security (1988a), Working Together: A Guide to Inter-Agency Co-operation for the Protection of Children from Abuse, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  15. —(1988b), Protecting Children: A Guide for Social Workers Conducting a Comprehensive Assessment, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  16. Dingwall, R., Lekclaar, J. and Murray, T. (1983), The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas. M. (1992), Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Driver, E. and Droisen, A. (1989), Child Sexual Abuse: Feminist Perspectives, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elias, N. (1985), The Loneliness ofDying, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Farmer, E. and Owen, M. (1995), Child Protection Practice: Private Risks and Public Remedies, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  21. Ferguson, H. (1990), ‘Rethinking Child Protection Practices: A Case for History’, in Taking Child Abuse Seriously (The Violence against Children Study Group), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. —(1992), ‘Cleveland in History: The Abused Child and Child Protection, 1880–1914’, in R. Cooter (ed.), In the Name of the Child: Health and Welfare, 1880–1950, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. —(1996), ‘The Protection of Children in Time: Child Protection and the Lives and Deaths of Children in Child Abuse Cases in Socio-historical Perspective’, Child and Family Social Work, 1, 205–17.Google Scholar
  24. —(2004), Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences ofModernity, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  25. Ferguson, H. and O’Reilly, M. (2001), Keeping Children Safe: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Promotion of Welfare, Dublin: A. & A. Farmar.Google Scholar
  26. Finkelhor, D. (1984), Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Froggett, L. (2002), Love, Hate and Welfare: Psychosocial Approaches to Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. —(1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. —(1994a), Beyond Left and Right: The Future ofRadical Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. —(1994b), ‘Living in a Post-traditional Society’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, M. (1990), ‘The Manifest and Latent Lessons of Child Abuse Inquiries’, British Journal ofSocial Work, 20: 197–213.Google Scholar
  33. Hooper, C. A. (1992), Mothers Surviving Child Sexual Abuse, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howe, D. (1992), ‘Child Abuse and the Bureaucratisation of Social Work’, Sociological Review, 40: 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jackson, S. and Scott, S. (1999), ‘Risk Anxiety and the Social Construction of Childhood’, in D. Lupton (ed.), Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kempe, C. H., F. N. Silverman, B. F. Steele, W. Droegmuller and H. K. Silver (1962), ‘The Battered Child Syndrome’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 181: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirkwood, A. (1993), The Leicester Inquiry1992, Leicester: Leicestershire County Council.Google Scholar
  38. Laming, H. (2003), The Victoria Climbié Inquiry, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  39. Lash, S. (1994), ‘Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure, Aesthetics, Community’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Lull, J. and Hinerman, S. (1997), ‘The Search for Scandal’, in J. Lull and S. Hinerman, (eds.), Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  41. Lupton, D. (1999), Risk, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. McGee, H., Garavan, R., de Barra, M., Byrne, J. and Conroy, R. (2002), The SAVI Report: Sexual Abuse and Violence in Ireland, Dublin: Liffey Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mellor, P. and Shilling, C. (1993), ‘Modernity, Self-identity and the Sequestration of Death’, Sociology, 27: 411–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Monckton, Sir Walter (1945), Report on the Circumstances which Led to the Boarding-out of Denis and Terence ONeill at Bank Farm, Minsterly and the Steps Taken to Supervise Their Welfare, Cmd. 6636, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  45. New South Wales Child Death Review Team Report (1997), Annual Report, 1996–1997, Sydney.Google Scholar
  46. Packman, J. (1981), The Childs Generation, London: Blackwell and Robertson.Google Scholar
  47. Parton, N. (1991), Governing The Family: Child Care, Child Protection and The State, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. —(1994), ‘Problematics of Government: (Post)modernity and Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, 24: 9–32.Google Scholar
  49. —(1996a), ‘Social Work, Risk and “the Blaming System”’, in N. Parton (ed.), Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Plummer, K. (1995), Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change and Social Worlds, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reder, P., Duncan, S. and Gray, M. (1993), Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Reder, P. and Duncan, S. (1999), Lost Innocents: A Follow-up Study of Fatal Child Abuse, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Ruddick, M. (1991), ‘A Receptacle for Public Anger’, in B. Franklin and N. Parton (eds.), Social Work, the Media and Public Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Shilling, C. (1993), The Body and Social Theory, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, C. (2001), ‘Trust and Confidence: Possibilities for Social Work in “High Modernity”’, British Journal ofSocial Work, 31: 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. — (2002), ‘The Sequestration of Experience: Rights Talk and Moral Thinking in “Late Modernity”’, Sociology, 36(1): 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stanley, J. and Goddard, C. (2002), In the Firing Line: Power and Violence in Child protection Work, London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Thorpe, D. (1994), Evaluating Child Protection, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  59. USABCAN (United States Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect) (1995), A Nations Shame: Fatal Child Abuse and Neglect in the United States, Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  60. Walter, T. (1994), The Revival of Death, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ward, A. (1995), ‘The “Matching Principle”: Exploring Connections between Practice and Training in Therapeutic Child Care: Part 1- Therapeutic Child Care and the Holding Environment’, Journal of Social Work Practice, 9(2): 177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zelizer, V. (1985), Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harry Ferguson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Ferguson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations