Skip to main content

Moral Uncertainty, Feminism and Descartes’ Demon

  • Chapter
Trust, Risk and Uncertainty
  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter the theme of moral uncertainty in the modern world is addressed through a discussion of Descartes’ mind/body dualism. I suggest that such uncertainty may, to some degree, be attributed to a kind of cultural mind/body dualism which makes reasoned moral judgement virtually impossible. I suggest, further, that a more careful reading of Descartes may help overcome such cultural dualism and establish firmer grounds for practical philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, C. and Tannery, P. [AT] (1897–1910), Oeuvres de Descartes, 12 vols., Paris: Leopold Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, R. and Grene, M. (1995), Descartes and his Contemporaries, Meditations, Objections and Replies, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assiter, A. (1996), Enlightened Women, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. and Morris, K. (1996), DescartesDualism, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2004), Speech, in The Guardian, 5 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1991), Patterns ofDissonance, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, G. (1998), ‘Liberalism without Universalism’, in Brecher, B., Halliday, J. and Kolinska, K. (eds), Nationalism and Racism in the Liberal Order, Avebury Series in Philosophy, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, F. M. (1907), Thucydides Mythistoricus, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976), Of Grammatology, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1968), Discourse on Method and Other Writings, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1985), The Philosophical Writing ofDescartes, 2 vols., trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothhoff and D. Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1971), ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (1991), ‘Reason and Emotion’, Radical Philosophy, no. 57, Spring Issue, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens, M. (1996), Imaginary Bodies, Ethics, Power and Corporeality, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, P. (1993), The Black Atlantic, Modernity and Double Consciousness, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1933), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp-Smith, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. (1984), The Man of Reason, ‘MaleandFemalein Western Philosophy, London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1979), The Postmodern Condition, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1996), Towards Justice and Virtue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000), Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993), Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A. (1986), Essays on DescartesMeditations, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1946), History of Western Philosophy, London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949), The Concept ofMind, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, N. (1993), ‘Though This be Method, yet there is Madness in it’, in Scheman, N. (ed.), Engenderings, Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, T. (1994), ‘Descartes’ Modernity’, in J. Cottingham (ed.), Reason, Will and Sensation, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (1984), A Short History ofModern Philosophy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waizer, M. (1977), Just and Unjust Wars, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Young, I. M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ:

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Alison Assiter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Assiter, A. (2005). Moral Uncertainty, Feminism and Descartes’ Demon. In: Watson, S., Moran, A. (eds) Trust, Risk and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506039_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics