Skip to main content

Democratization and the Rule of Law in Azerbaijan: Europe’s Relevance

  • Chapter
The State of Law in the South Caucasus

Part of the book series: Euro-Asian Studies ((EAS))

Abstract

The period of continuing political and economic instability following Azerbaijan’s independence from the Soviet Union has resulted in limited progress in state building, democratization and the construction of the rule of law. The usual challenges facing transition countries have been compounded by, among other things, the ongoing conflict over Nagorno Karabakh and the difficulties faced in managing oil reserves.1 However, a great incentive to make democratic and legal progress is the possibility of closer ties with Europe. This chapter outlines the state of the rule of law and democratization in Azerbaijan today and considers prospects for reform through dialogue with Europe. In this regard, it focuses on Azerbaijan’s relationship with the European Union (EU), but also considers other aspects of the European relationship, including Azerbaijan’s membership in the Council of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the Nagorno Karabkah conflict generally, see T. de Waal, Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War (New York: New York University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the question of oil, see Y. Kalyuzhnova, A. Mayers Jaffe, D. Lynch and R. Sickles, eds, Energy in the Caspian Region: Present and Future (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See T. Swietochowski, Russia and Azerbaijan: a Borderland in Transition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. As Freedom House puts it: ‘Laws are often vague, and only implementing decrees are more specific. There is no official outlet for publicizing changes in laws … There is little public knowledge of laws that affect commercial activities, and such laws are rarely applied.’ See Freedom House, Nations in Transit 1998 (1998), p. 99. Available at http://freedomhouse.org/research/nattransit.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2003 (2003), p. 115. Available at http://freedomhouse.org/research/nattransit.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  6. US Department of State Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Country Report on Human Rights Practices, Azerbaijan (25 February 2004). Available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41670.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2001 (2001). Available at http://freedomhouse.org/research/nattransit.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Crisis Group Europe Report, Azerbaijan: Turning Over a New Leaf?, Baku/Brussels (13 May 2004), p. 31. Available at http://www.icg.org/home/index.cfm?id=2752.l=1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. OSCE/ODIHR, Final Report on the Presidential Election (15 October 2003). Available at http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2003/11/1151_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  10. OSCE/ODIHR and Venice Commission, Joint Final Assessment of the Election Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Opinion # 214/2002, Strasbourg/Warsaw (1 September 2003). Available at http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/ field_activities/2003azerbaijan/az_asmelcode.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  11. OSCE/ODIHR, Republic of Azerbaijan Presidential Elections, Needs Assessment Report (24 July 2003), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper, Azerbaijan: Presidential Elections 2003 (13 October 2003), p. 22. Available at http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/eca/ azerbaijan/3.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  13. OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, CoE Parliamentary Assembly, OSCE/ODIHR, Joint Press Release, Azerbaijan voting generally orderly, but electoral process still short of international standards in several respects (16 October 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. On the legal aspects of the pipeline generally, see C. P. M. Waters, ‘Governance and the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan Pipeline’, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 16 (2004), p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Human Rights Watch, Azerbaijan: Media, the Presidential Elections and the Aftermath (4 August 2004), p. 8. Available at http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/eca/azerbaijan/2004/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Gulara Guliyeva

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guliyeva, G. (2005). Democratization and the Rule of Law in Azerbaijan: Europe’s Relevance. In: Waters, C.P.M. (eds) The State of Law in the South Caucasus. Euro-Asian Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506015_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics