Abstract
Federalism, as a mainstay of Germany’s political and constitutional order, was adopted with enthusiasm in 1871. It has commonly and correctly been analysed by scholars as a governing mechanism to link local and national levels of politics. Consequently, we know quite a lot about how federalism worked in practice, and how it fitted within German constitutional law tradition. In addition, it is often remarked that federalism, as a political system that linked the local with the national, accommodated the historical experiences of the various states that made the German Empire. But on this topic, in fact, we know very little, namely on the ways in which federalism, as a political system, linked with post-1871 values and beliefs about the place of local and regional identity within the nation. It is this link that interests me in this chapter. What were the relations in the German Empire (1871–1918) between federalism as a political idea and federalism as a reflection of local and national identities? By accepting federalism as a political system, how did Germans negotiate the new 1871 realities of localness and nationhood? Differently put, it is often mentioned that federalism in 1871 reflected traditions and values. But, exactly, which values, and how did they connect to the political system? By thinking about these questions I hope to articulate some of the historical problems posed by federalism to scholars of Germany. My attempt is to link federalism, as a political system that reconciled local and national identity, with the Heimat idea, as a symbolic representation whose function was similar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nevil Johnson, ‘Territory and Power: Some Historical Determinants of the Constitutional Structure of the Federal Republic of Germany’, in Charlie Jeffery, ed., Recasting German Federalism: The Legacies of Unification (London 1999 ), p. 25.
For an excellent introduction to the debate on Germany’s special historical path (the Sonderweg debate), see Jürgen Kocka, ‘German History before Hitler: The Debate about the German Sonderweg’, Journal of Contemporary History 23 (January 1988), pp. 3–16.
Thomas Nipperdey, ‘Der Föderalismus in der deutschen Geschichte’, in Nipperdey, Nachdenken über die deutsche Geschichte (Munich 1991), pp. 71–131.
David Dorondo, ‘Federalism’, in Dieter Buse and Jürgen Doerr, eds, Modern Germany: An Encyclopedia of History, People, and Culture, 1871–1990 (New York 1998 ), p. 317.
Georg Kleine, Der württembergische Minister-Presidänt Frhr. Hermann von Mittnacht, 1825–1909 (Stuttgart 1969), p. 83.
Richard Evans, Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years 1830–1910 (Oxford 1987), pp. 1–2.
See also Hans Mommsen, ‘History and National Identity: The Case of Germany’, German Studies Review, 6 (October 1983), p. 575.
Alon Confina, The Nation as a Local Metaphor: Württemberg, Imperial Germany and National Memory, 1871–1918 (Chapel Hill 1997).
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London 1990).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Confino, A. (2002). Federalism and the Heimat Idea in Imperial Germany. In: Umbach, M. (eds) German Federalism. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505797_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505797_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42862-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50579-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)