Introduction: ‘The Sun is Gone Down’

  • Jeremy Tambling

Abstract

Blake’s art celebrates dawn, the theme of the picture ‘Albion Rose’ or ‘Glad Day’, which is inscribed: ‘Albion rose from where he labourd at the Mill with Slaves/Giving himself for the Nations he danc’d the dance of Eternal Death’ (E. 671, K. 160). The lyric ‘And did those feet’ from the Preface to Milton anticipates day, its ‘dark Satanic mills’ (E. 95–6, K. 480–1) like Albion’s mill, representing ‘the same dull round’ (E. 2, K. 97).1 C.H. Parry (1848–1918) set it in 1916 for the patriotic ‘Fight for Right’ movement of Sir Francis Younghusband (1863–1942), a British army officer and explorer, responsible for the invasion of Tibet in 1903, and touched with a belief in world religion. Parry repeated the performance for a Women’s Demonstration meeting at the Albert Hall in 1917, while at a Suffrage Demonstration concert on 13 March 1918, Millicent Fawcett wanted it as the Women’s Voters Hymn. The Women’s Institute took it up when it started in 1924. Elgar rescored it in 1922 for the Leeds Festival, and since 1953 it has been sung at the last night of the Promenade concerts, so associating Blake with Thomson’s ‘Rule Britannia’ (1740).2

Keywords

Europe Amid Assure Hunt Nash 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See Jeremy Dibble, C. Hubert H. Parry: His Life and Music (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992), pp. 483–5,Google Scholar
  2. and Patrick French, Younghusband: The Last Great Imperial Adventurer (London: Harper Collins 1994), pp. 294–303. Five years after ‘Rule Britannia’, there appeared ‘God Save the King’, becoming in the early 1800s the ‘national anthem’,Google Scholar
  3. Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837 (London: Vintage 1996), p. 47, so linking patriotism and religion.Google Scholar
  4. See Shirley Dent and Jason Whittaker, Radical Blake: Influence and Afterlife from 1827 (London: Palgrave 2002), pp. 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3.
    David V. Erdman (ed.), A Concordance to the Writings of William Blake (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1967), 2 vols.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    David Wagenknecht, Blake’s Night: William Blake and the Idea of Pastoral (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. See Philip Brockbank, ‘“Within the Visible Diurnal Sphere”: The Moving World of Paradise Lost’, in The Creativity of Preception: Essays in the Genesis of Literature and Art (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1991), pp. 59–64, for day and night in Milton.Google Scholar
  8. (His account of Paradise Lost in C.A. Patrides (ed.), Paradise Lost 1–2, London: Macmillan 1972, pp. 13–74, excellently intersects Milton with Blake.)Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    Valentine Cunningham, Everywhere Spoken Against: Dissent in the Victorian Novel (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975) discusses the Irvingites, reprinting Dickens’s satirical poem on them, p. 197.Google Scholar
  10. See also Columba Graham Flegg, ‘Gathered Under Apostles’: A Study of the Catholic Apostolic Church (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 6.
    See BR pp. 256–347. On Linnell, see Alfred T. Story, The Life of John Linnell, 2 vols (London, Richard Bentley 1892)Google Scholar
  12. on Samuel Palmer, see Raymond Lister, The Paintings of Samuel Palmer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985)Google Scholar
  13. and Raymond Lister, Samuel Palmer and ‘The Ancients’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984).Google Scholar
  14. See also Gerald E. Bentley Jr, Robert N. Essick, Shelley M. Bennett, and Morton D. Paley, Essays on the Blake Followers (San Marino: Huntington Library and Art Gallery 1983).Google Scholar
  15. 7.
    No. 10 in Colin Harrison, Samuel Palmer (Oxford: Ashmolean Museum 1997), pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    See John Barrell, The Dark Side of the Landscape: The Rural Poor in English Painting 1730–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980), pp. 32–3,Google Scholar
  17. discussing Linnell’s ‘Woodcutting in Windsor Forest’ (1834–1835).Google Scholar
  18. See Linnell’s London illustrations, John Linnell: A Centennial Exhibition, catalogued Katharine Crouan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Fitzwilliam Museum 1983).Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    On Blake’s influence, see Robert J. Bertholf and Annette S. Levitt, William Blake and the Moderns (Albany: State University of New York 1982).Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    See Reynolds, ed. Nicolas Penny (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1986), pp. 251–4.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    See Henry Fuseli, 1741–1825 (London: Tate Gallery 1975), pp. 99–104, for the impact of Reynolds and Fuseli on Gericault’s The Raft of the Medusa, see Patrick Noon (ed.), Constable to Delacroix: British Art and the French Romantics (London: Tate Publishing 2003), p. 84.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    For Dante in English, and the material for this paragraph, see Paget Tonybee, Dante in English Literature, 2 vols, London, 1909;Google Scholar
  23. Werner P. Frederich, Dante’s Fame Abroad, Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1950 — which includes work on German translations and plays derived from Ugolino material;Google Scholar
  24. Frances Yates, ‘Transformations of Dante’s Ugolino’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 14 (1951), 92–117,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. William de Sua, Dante into English (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press 1964), esp. pp. 8–14, 18–20 on the Gothic horror stressed in the eighteenth-century translations,Google Scholar
  26. Steve Ellis, Dante and English Poetry: Shelley to T.S. Eliot (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983),Google Scholar
  27. V. Tinkler-Villani, Visions of Dante in English Poetry (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1989),Google Scholar
  28. Ralph Pite, The Circle of our Vision: Dante’s Presence in English Romantic Poetry (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1994),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. John Roe, ‘Dante, Ugolino and Thomas Gray’ in Nicholas Havely (ed.) Dante’s Modern Afterlife (London: Macmillan), 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 17.
    See Ricardo Quinones, Foundation Sacrifice in Dante’s Commedia (Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press 1994). p. 29.Google Scholar
  31. 18.
    Freud connects narcissism with melancholia: see Freud, Sigmund, On Metapsychology: The Penguin Freud vol. 11 (Harmondsworth: Penguin 1977), pp. 258–9.Google Scholar
  32. 19.
    Lacan discusses this fantasy of fragmentation: the mirror-stage seems to convey wholeness to ‘inchoate desires’, gendered identity divides these again: Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection trans. Alan Sheridan (London: Tavistock 1977), pp. 4, 11;Google Scholar
  33. The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III: 1955–1956 ed. Jacques Alain-Miller, trans. Russell Grigg (London: Routledge 1993), p. 39.Google Scholar
  34. 20.
    See Theodor Spencer, ‘The Story of Ugolino in Chaucer’, Speculum 9 (1934), pp. 295–301;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piero Boitani, ‘The Monk’s Tale: Chaucer and Boccaccio’, Medium Aevum 45 (1976), 50–9,Google Scholar
  36. and see his reading of Canto 26 in Kenelm Foster and Patrick Boyde (eds) Cambridge Readings in Dante (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1981), pp. 70–89,Google Scholar
  37. and Boitani (ed.), Chaucer and the Trecento (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983), pp. 115–40.Google Scholar
  38. 21.
    John Beer finds the 1818 revisions more ‘personally oriented’ than the earlier version: see his ‘Influence and Independence in Blake’ in Michael Phillips, Interpreting Blake (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1978), p. 210. In Blake’s Humanism (Manchester: Manchester University Press 1969), p. 237, he takes Ugolino and his four sons as the five senses. If Ugolino represents despair, yet in Blake’s last illustrations of Dante (1824–1827), in the pencil drawing of Ugolino and his sons, two angels hover. Albert Roe, Blake’s Illustrations to the Divine Comedy (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1953), p. 153, links these angels with ‘Man’s Perceptions are not bounded by organs of perception; he perceives more than sense (tho’ ever so acute) can discover’ from ‘There is No Natural Religion’ (E. 2, K. 97).Google Scholar
  39. 22.
    David Erdman, The Illuminated Blake (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1975), p. 113.Google Scholar
  40. 23.
    Blake’s reading of Fuseli overturns his own reading of the text. The reaction to Ugolino is split, and involves Blake in gender-blindness. He adds: ‘The child in [Ugolino’s] arms, whether boy or girl signifies not (but the critic must be a fool who has not read Dante and does not know a boy from a girl). Whether boy or girl signifies not’ (my italics); but it does signify, especially as the figure lying in the lap of Ugolino, like Cordelia dead in Lear’s arms, with hair hanging down and falling back from the head like the woman in the Fuseli ‘Nightmare’ seems to be female, a daughter-figure. Blake’s reading of the picture and his defence of it implies a certain repression. The father in Fuseli’s painting cannot be considered outside the contexts of Romantic interest in incest, which, reworking the motif of technophagia, sexualizes the patriarch. Compare Fuseli’s picture with James Barry, ‘King Lear Weeping over the Body of Cordelia’ (1786–1787);Google Scholar
  41. see Scott Paul Gordon, ‘Reading Patriot Art: James Barry’s King Lear’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 36 (2003), 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 24.
    Jeremy Tambling, Dante and Difference: Writing in the Commedia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988), pp. 82–3.Google Scholar
  43. 26.
    Note the militarism when Enitharmon rouses Sotha and Thiralatha (Europe 14.26–31, E. 66, K. 244). See Northrop Frye, Fearful Symmetry: A Study of William Blake (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1947), p. 262.Google Scholar
  44. 32.
    Freud, ‘Beyond the Pleasure Principle’, On Metapsychology: The Penguin Freud 11 (Harmondsworth: Penguin 1977), p. 306.Google Scholar
  45. 33.
    Nicholas Abraham and Maria Torok, The Shell and the Kernel trans. Nicholas T. Rand (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1987). pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
  46. 35.
    See Peggy Meyer Sherry, ‘The Predicament of the Autograph: William Blake’, Glyph 4 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins 1979), pp. 130–55.Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane (London: Athlone Press 1984), p. 362.Google Scholar
  48. Cited, Paul Youngquist, Madness and Blake’s Myth (University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press 1989), p. 180.Google Scholar
  49. 37.
    Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy section 10, trans. Francis Golffing (New York: Doubleday Anchor 1956), p. 66.Google Scholar
  50. 38.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority trans. Alfonso Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press 1969), p. 25.Google Scholar
  51. 39.
    Maurice Blanchot, The Step Not Beyond trans. Lycette Nelson (Albany: SUNY Press 1992), pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
  52. 40.
    Martin Heidegger, On the Way to Language trans. Peter D. Hertz (New York: Harper & Row 1982), p. 160.Google Scholar
  53. 41.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Existence and Existents trans. Alphonse Lingis (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1978), p. 65. A vigil is a watch kept through the night before a religious festival. See my ‘Strange Images of Death: Macbeth and Levinas’, Essays in Criticism 54. 4 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jeremy Tambling 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Tambling

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations