Advertisement

Constructing the Liberal Peace from Above

  • Oliver P. Richmond
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

‘Peace is the tranquillity of order’1

Keywords

Civil Society Security Council Liberal State Peace Process Security Council Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Saint Augustine, CityofGod, XIX, 13, 1, London: Penguin Classics, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    For an elaboration of this point see Oliver P. Richmond, Maintaining Order, Making Peace, London: Palgrave, 2002, esp. Chapter VI.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Mike Pugh, ‘Peacekeeping and Critical Theory’, BISA, LSE, 18–18 December 2002, p. 1. Pugh argues that ‘…modern versions of peacekeeping can be considered as forms of riot control directed against unruly parts of the world’. Ibid., p. 2.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Robert Cooper, The Breaking of Nations, London: Atlantic Books, 2003, pp. 70–1.Google Scholar
  5. 7 Ibid., p. 71.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Darvid Harland, ‘Legitimacy and effectiveness in international administration’, Global Governance, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, p. 15.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    See my British Academy funded project on Securitisation and Intervention in the Eastern Mediterranean, forthcoming 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    See World Bank Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Unit, Conflict Analysis Framework, August 26, 2003, p. 2.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    See DFID, Conducting Conflict Assessment: Guidance Notes, January 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    See for example, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Doctrine of the International Community, Speech to the Chicago Economic Club, 22 April, 1999: US President Bill Clinton, Address to the Nation, 24 March 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    See also Bill Clinton, ‘Address to the 54th Session of the United Nations General Assembly’, US-UN Press Release, No. 59 (99), September 21 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    DPKO, Multidisciplinary Peacekeeping: Lessons from Recent Experience, April 1999. See also Report of the Secretary-Generals High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change, United Nations, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Chris Brown, Selective Intervention: A Defence oflnconsistency, Paper presented at University of St Andrews, November 11, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Pugh has also described what he calls the ‘New York consensus’. See Mike Pugh, ‘Peacekeeping and Critical Theory’, op. cit., pp. 6–9. These conceptions are similar to, and perhaps familiar as the ‘Washington Consensus’, which has often come to be used as a synonym for neoliberalism and ‘market fundamentalism’. See John Williamson, Senior Fellow, Institute for International Economics, ‘What Should The Bank Think About The Washington Consensus?’, Paper prepared as a background to the World Bank’s World Development Report 2000, July 1999, www.worldbank.org/research/journals/wbro/obsaug00/pdf/(6)Williamson.pdf, p. 1. For a critique, see George Soros, The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Little: Brown, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Nicholas J. Wheeler, ‘The Political and Moral Limits of Western Military Intervention to Protect Civilians in Danger’ in Colin Maclnnes and Nicolas J. Wheeler (eds), Dimensions of Western Military Intervention, London: Frank Cass, 2002, p. 3.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    This is essentially what Mandelbaum calls the combination of peace, democracy and free markets. Michael Mandelbaum, The Ideas that Conquered the World, New York: Public Affairs, 2002, p. 6.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    See in particular, Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging ofDevelopment and Security, London: Zed Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    For a good overview see Michele Griffin, ‘Retrenchment, Reform, and Regionalisation: Trends in UN Peace Support Operations’, in International Peacekeeping, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Max Singer and Aaron Wildavsky, The Real World Order, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, 1993, p. 3.Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    See Boutros Boutros Ghali, An Agenda for Peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping, A/47/277–5/24111, 17 June 1992; An Agenda for Development: Report of the Secretary-General, A/48/935, 6 May 1994; An Agenda for Democratization, A/50/332 AND A/51/512, 17 December 1996.Google Scholar
  22. 34.
    Jack Snyder, From Voting to Violence, London: W.W. Norton, 2000, p. 43.Google Scholar
  23. 36.
    Jarat Chopra and Tanja Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’, Global Governance, Vol. 10, 2004, p. 292.Google Scholar
  24. 38.
    Ian Clarke, ‘Another Double Movement: the great transformation after the Cold War?’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, Special Issue, 2001, p. 248.Google Scholar
  25. 44.
    Michael Mann, The Sources ofSocial Power, Vol. 2, Cambridge: CUP, 1986, p. 55.Google Scholar
  26. 45.
    See William Bain, ‘The Political Theory of Trusteeship and the Twilight of International Equality’ in International Relations, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. 46.
    See L. Kyle, International Trusteeship — A Concept Due For Revival?, Royal College of Defence Studies, http://www.mod.uk/rcds/kyle.htm.
  28. 47.
    See Ronnie D. Lipschutz, ‘The Clash of Governmentalities: The Fall of the UN Republic and America’s Reach for Imperium’, Exploring Imperium, University of Sussex, 11 December 2002: Martin Shaw, ‘Exploring imperia: Western-global power amidst the wars of quasiimperial states’ Exploring Imperium, University of Sussex, 11 December 2002, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    Francis Fukuyama, State Building: Governance and Order in the Twenty First Century, London: Profile, 2004, p. 141.Google Scholar
  30. 55.
    Roland Paris, At Wars End, Cambridge: CUP, 2004, p. 121, 124.Google Scholar
  31. 59.
    UNDP Mission Statement, http://www.pcpafg.org/Organizations/undp/UNDP%20Mission%20Statement.htm. Accessed 1 November 2004.
  32. 67.
    Henry Kissinger, Does America Need a Foreign Policy?, London: Simon and Schuster, 2001, p. 18.Google Scholar
  33. 71.
    For more on this see Liberia Unravelling, ICG Africa Briefing Paper, 19 August 2002. http://www.icg.org//Iibrary/documents/report_archive/A400741_19082002.pdf, accessed 1 November 2004.
  34. 74.
    Richard Caplan, ‘International Authority and State Building: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Global Governance, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, p. 15.Google Scholar
  35. 85.
    Dragoljub Stojanov, Personal Interview, Chair of Economics, University of Sarajevo, 17 January, 2005.Google Scholar
  36. 86.
    For example, see Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned, Independent Commission for Kosovo, OUP, 2000.Google Scholar
  37. 87.
    See in particular David Chandler, Faking Democracy, London: Pluto Press 2002.Google Scholar
  38. 89.
    Jurgen Habermas, ‘Bestialität und Humanität’, Die Zeit 18:1, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. 90.
    For an excellent account of this see William G. O’Neill, Kosovo: An Unfinished Peace, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002, pp. 37–40.Google Scholar
  40. 93.
    Patrick Morrison, Personal Interview, UN Press Office, Pristina, 14 January, 2004.Google Scholar
  41. 94.
    Ibid., p. 137.Google Scholar
  42. 95.
    Soren Jessen-Peterson, SSRG Kosovo, ‘Kosovo may be moving towards the end game’ in Focus Kosovo, UNMIK: Kosovo, September—October 2004, p. 5.Google Scholar
  43. 98.
    Statement by Jacques Rupnik (Centre dEtudes et de Recherches Internationales), European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, 25 January 2005, http://europa-eu-un.org/articles/sl/article_4265_sl.htm
  44. 99.
    There is much concurrence on its likely longevity. See for example, A. Yannis, ‘The UN as Government in Kosovo’, Global Governance, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, pp. 67–8.Google Scholar
  45. 101.
    See Richard Falk, Human Rights Horizons, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 68.Google Scholar
  46. 102.
    Unattributable Diplomatic Sources, Personal Interviews, UNMIK, Pristina, 15 January, 2005.Google Scholar
  47. 103.
  48. 107.
    A. Suhrke, ‘Peacekeepers as Nation-builders: Dilemmas of the UN in East Timor’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 8, No. 4, Winter 2001, p. 7.Google Scholar
  49. 108.
    Michael G. Smith, Peacekeeping in East Timor, Colorado: Lynne Rienner, 2003, p. 63Google Scholar
  50. 109.
    Kym Smithies, Personal Interview, Communications Officer, UNDP, Dili, 9 November 2004.Google Scholar
  51. 110.
    Ibid., p. 88.Google Scholar
  52. 111.
    Prabha Chandran, Personal Interview, Public Relations, World Bank, Dili, 10 November, 2004.Google Scholar
  53. 114.
    Ron Isaacson, Personal Interview, World Bank Deputy Country Manager, Dili, 11 November 2004.Google Scholar
  54. 115.
    Klaus Rohland and Sarah Cliffe, ‘The East Timor Reconstruction Program: Successes, Problems and Tradeoffs’, Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Unit, Work Bank, No. 2, November 2002.Google Scholar
  55. 116.
    Sidonio Frietas, Personal Interview, Programme Manager, Democracy and Governance Programme, USAID, 11 November, 2004.Google Scholar
  56. 117.
    Olav Ofstad, Personal Interview, Head of Delegation, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Dili 11 November, 2004.Google Scholar
  57. 121.
    Kofi Annan, Report of the UN Secretary GeneralNo Exit Without Strategy’, S/2001/934, 20 April 2001, para. 43, p. 8.Google Scholar
  58. 122.
    Anthony Goldstone, ‘UNTAET with hindsight’, Global Governance, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, p. 87.Google Scholar
  59. 124.
    Jarat Chopra, ‘The UN’s Kingdom of East Timor’, Survival, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2000, p. 27.Google Scholar
  60. 128.
    For more on this, see UN Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary General for Reconstruction, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, http://www.irinnews.org/report.asp?ReportlD=22325, 24 February 2002. See also Lakhdar Brahimi, cited in Michael Ignatieff, op. cit., pp. 96–97. Brahimi says that he has tried to make such that UN activities are co-ordinated, and that Afghanistan is not flooded with ‘out of work nation-builders’ from Kosovo, Bosnia, and East Timor. He has made sure that the Afghan government is in control rather than the internationals.
  61. 130.
    Peter Marsden, ‘Afghanistan: The Reconstruction Process’ International Affairs, Vol. 79 No. 1, 2003, pp. 94–7.Google Scholar
  62. 134.
    Nicolas Stockton, ‘Strategic Coordination in Afghanistan’, ECHO/Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, August 2002, p. 2.Google Scholar
  63. 135.
    Ibid., p. 5.Google Scholar
  64. 145.
    BBC News, ‘Nationalists prosper in struggling Bosnia’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2304653.stm, Monday, 7 October, 2002.
  65. 146.
    David Chandler, From Kosovo to Kabul: Human Rights and International Intervention, London: Pluto, 2002, p. 194. Ignatieff also agree with this analysis. op. cit., p. 93.Google Scholar
  66. 148.
    Roland Paris, ‘Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism’, in International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1997, p. 79.Google Scholar
  67. 153.
    George Soros, The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Little: Brown, 1998.Google Scholar
  68. 154.
    See J. Stiglitz, More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving towards the post Washington Consensus, Helsinki: UN University, 1998.Google Scholar
  69. 156.
    Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars Organised Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999. esp. Ch. 7.Google Scholar
  70. 164.
    See Roland Paris, At Wars End, op. cit.; Duffield, op. cit.; Chandler, op. cit; See also the important collection of essays in Alex Bellamy and Paul Williams, ‘Peace Operations and Global Order’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004.Google Scholar
  71. 167.
    UN Secretary General Report, ‘No Exit Without Strategy’, UN Doc. S/2001/394, 20th April, 2001, p. 2.Google Scholar
  72. 174.
    John Ruggie, ‘Collective Goods and Future International Collaboration’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 66, September 1972, p. 874–893.Google Scholar
  73. 175.
    Peter Haas, ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organisation, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1992, p. 3.Google Scholar
  74. 176.
    John Ruggie, Constructing the World Politics, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
  75. 177.
    Michel Foucault, ‘Truth and Power’ in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader, London: Penguin, 1989, p. 65; George Orwell, 1984, London: Signet Classic, 1969, p. 164; Rudyard Kipling, ‘The White Man’s Burden’, in John Beecroft (ed.), Kipling: A Selection of His Stories and Poems, Vol. II, NY: Doubleday & Co., Inc., pp. 444–445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oliver P. Richmond 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver P. Richmond
    • 1
  1. 1.School of International RelationsUniversity of St. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations