Towards Peace-as-Governance

  • Oliver P. Richmond
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


‘… and make war that we may live in peace.’1 ‘Peace is not an absence of war; it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, and justice.’2


Civil Society Security Council International System Humanitarian Intervention International Criminal Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Benedict D. Spinoza, ‘Tractatus Theologico-Politicus’, in E. Curley, A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994 [1670].Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    George Schwab, ‘Introduction’, in Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996, p. 9.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    John Mearsheimer, ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, in M.E. Brown, Owen R. Coates, Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Millar, Theories of War and Peace, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998, p. 175.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Michael Howard, The Invention of Peace and the Re-Invention of War, London: Profile, 2002, pp. 80–1.Google Scholar
  5. 7 Ibid., p. 85.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    For more on this see Martin Ceadal, Thinking About Peace and War, Oxford: OUP, 1987, p. 4–6.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Peter Schwab, Africa: A Continent Self-Destructs, London: Palgrave, 2001, p. 64.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Ibid., p. 64.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Francis Fukuyama, The End ofHistory and the Last Man, London: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    David Held, Democracy and the Global Order, Cambridge: Polity, 1995, p. ix.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Ian Clark, The Post-Cold War Order, Oxford: OUP, 2001: G. John Ikenberry, After Victory, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 216–241.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security, London: Zed Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    G. John Ikenberry, After victory: institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, p. 13.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Ibid., p. 15.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    This of course, was made famous by Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan, 1977, p. 245.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    See World Bank Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Unit, Conflict Analysis Framework, World bank, August 26, 2003, p. 2.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Francis Fukuyama, State Building: Governance and Order in the Twenty First Century, London: Profile, 2004, p. 48.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Tim Dunne, Inventinglnternational Society, London: Palgrave, 1998, p. xii.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, London: Macmillan, 1939, p. 209.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    Mervyn Frost, Ethics in International Affairs: A Constitutive Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 104–111: See also Chris Brown, Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity, 2002, p. 65.Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, New York: Basic Books, 2000, pp. 58–63, pp. 74–85.Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    Max Weber, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, The Vocation Lectures, Indianapolis: Hackett, 2004 (1919).Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    See Nicolas Wheeler, Saving Strangers, Oxford: OUP, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    See in particular, Mary Kaldor, New and Old Wars, Cambridge: Polity, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 39.
    Andrew Linklater, ‘Citizenship, Humanity, and Cosmopolitan Harm Conventions’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2001, pp. 262–263.Google Scholar
  27. 42.
    Martha Finnemore, National Interest in International Society, Cornell UP, 1996: Chris Brown, op. cit., p. 138.Google Scholar
  28. 43.
    See Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. 44.
    Joseph S. Nye, ‘Redefining the National Interest’, Foreign Affairs, July/August 1999.Google Scholar
  30. 45.
    Alex Bellamy, ‘Humanitarian Intervention and the Three Traditions’, Global Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003, p. 3.Google Scholar
  31. 46.
    Ibid., pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  32. 49.
    John Rawls, Theory ofJustice, Oxford: OUP, 1999 (1971).Google Scholar
  33. 50.
    Chris Brown, op. cit., 174: John Rawis, Law of Peoples, Harvard UP, 2001, pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  34. 51.
    See also Michael Doyle, ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs,’ Philosophy and Public A ffairs, Vol. 12, 1983, pp. 205–235.Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    Jean Bethke Elshtain, Just War Against Terror, New York: Basic Books, 2003, p. 161.Google Scholar
  36. 56.
    John Rawls, Law of Peoples, Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999, p. 47.Google Scholar
  37. 57.
    Fareed Zakaria, The Future of Freedom, New York: Norton, 2003, p. 115. The democratic peace argument is only one component of the liberal peace, however.Google Scholar
  38. 58.
    For more on this see Bruce Buchan, ‘Explaining War and Peace’, Alternatives, Vol. 27, 2002, p. 408.Google Scholar
  39. 60.
    Bernard Lewis, The Crisis of Islam, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003, p. 123.Google Scholar
  40. 61.
    Jack Snyder, From Voting to Violence, London: W.W. Norton, 2000, p. 40.Google Scholar
  41. 62.
    Michael Mann, ‘The Colonial Darkside of Democracy’,, p. 1.Google Scholar
  42. 63.
    Ibid., p. 39.Google Scholar
  43. 65.
    Kofi Annan, Democracy as an International Issue’, in Global Governance, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2002, p. 135.Google Scholar
  44. 66.
    Ibid., p. 138.Google Scholar
  45. 74.
    Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen, The West, Civil Society, and the Construction of Peace, London: Palgrave, 2003, p. 16.Google Scholar
  46. 75.
    Ibid., p. 42.Google Scholar
  47. 80.
    Robert Cooper, The Breaking ofNations, London: Atlantic Books, 2003, p. x.Google Scholar
  48. 82.
    See Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar
  49. 90.
    Fred Halliday, ‘The Romance of Non-State Actors’, in Daphne Josselin and William Wallace (eds), Non-State Actors in World Politics, London: Palgrave, 2001, p. 35.Google Scholar
  50. 94.
    Cosmopolitan Democracy refers to democratic development within and between states. States are still the over-riding force, however. See John Keane for more on this. John Keane, Global Civil Society, Cambridge: CUP, 2003, p. 123.Google Scholar
  51. 95.
    Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: CUP, 1981, p. 42.Google Scholar
  52. 97.
    Kenneth Waltz, Theoryoflnternational Politics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, p. 95.Google Scholar
  53. 102.
    See for example, Ruggie on multilateralism as a foundational principle of the international system. G.J. Ruggie (eds), ‘Multilateralism’ in Multilateralism Matters, NY, 1993, p. 25.Google Scholar
  54. 103.
    Michel Foucault, ‘Governmentality’, in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991, p. 103.Google Scholar
  55. 104.
    See Michel Foucault, The Birth of the Clinic, London: Routledge, 1976.Google Scholar
  56. 105.
    Jan Art Scholte, ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance’ in Global Governance, Vol. 8, No. 3 (July—September 2002), pp. 281–304.Google Scholar
  57. 106.
    Ibid., p. 288.Google Scholar
  58. 107.
    See for example, Preface to Francois Debrix and Cynthia Weber (eds), Rituals ofMediation, Minneapolis: Minnesota, 2003, p. xv.Google Scholar
  59. 109.
    For more on this argument, see Roland Paris, ‘International Peace-building and the “Mission Civilisatrice”’, Review oflnternational Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2002, pp. 642–5.Google Scholar
  60. 110.
    For more on this see Joseph Nye, ‘Before War’, Washington Post, 14 March, 2003; Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., ‘The Immorality of Preventive War’, Reprinted from the Los Angeles Time,
  61. 113.
    See Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999, pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
  62. 114.
    See A. MacGrew, The Transformation of Global Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  63. 115.
    M. Waters, Globalisation, London: Routledge, 1995, p. 3.Google Scholar
  64. 116.
    Robin Cohen, Global Diasporas, London: UCL Press, 1997, pp. 155–7Google Scholar
  65. 117.
    Jan Art Scholte, Globalisation: A Critical Introduction, London: Macmillan, 2000, p. 3.Google Scholar
  66. 118.
    Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
  67. 119.
    Ibid., p. 6.Google Scholar
  68. 120.
    Lloyd Axeworthy, ‘Human Security and Global Governance: Putting People First’, Global Governance, Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 20.Google Scholar
  69. 121.
    Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar
  70. 122.
    John Williamson, Senior Fellow, Institute for International Economics, ‘What Should The Bank Think About The Washington Consensus?’, Paper prepared as a background to the World Bank’s World Development Report 2000, July 1999, obsaug00/pdf/(6)Williamson.pdf, p. 1.Google Scholar
  71. 123.
    George Soros, The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Little: Brown, 1998.Google Scholar
  72. 124.
    Mary Kaldor, op. cit., p. 3.Google Scholar
  73. 125.
    Ibid., p. 4.Google Scholar
  74. 126.
    W.K. Hancock, Argument of Empire, Harmondsworth, 1943, pp. 76, 143, 152, cited by Martin Ceadal, op. cit., p. 39.Google Scholar
  75. 127.
    Ian Clark, op. cit., p. 139.Google Scholar
  76. 128.
    Ibid., p. 140.Google Scholar
  77. 129.
    Ibid., p. 139.Google Scholar
  78. 130.
    David Held, ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’, Review of Intemational Studies, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2003, p. 470.Google Scholar
  79. 131.
    Ibid., pp. 470–1.Google Scholar
  80. 132.
    Ibid., p. 474.Google Scholar
  81. 133.
    Ibid., p. 474.Google Scholar
  82. 134.
    Ibid., pp. 475–8.Google Scholar
  83. 135.
    Scholte, 2000, pp. 211Google Scholar
  84. 136.
    Clarke, op. cit., p. 140.Google Scholar
  85. 138.
    Anthony Giddens, Runaway World, London: Profile Books, 2002, p. 5.Google Scholar
  86. 139.
    Ibid., p. 19.Google Scholar
  87. 140.
    Op. cit., p. 140.Google Scholar
  88. 141.
    Ibid., p. 148.Google Scholar
  89. 142.
    Ibid., p. 160.Google Scholar
  90. 143.
    Stephen Gill, ‘Globalisation, Market Civilisation and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, Millennium, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1995, pp. 399–400.Google Scholar
  91. 153.
    Christopher Coker, Humane Warfare, London: Routledge, 2001, p. 40.Google Scholar
  92. 154.
    Clifford Gertz, ‘Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in New States’, in Clifford Gertz (ed.), Old Societies and New States, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963, p. 110.Google Scholar
  93. 155.
    T.R. Gurr, ‘Ethnic Conflict on the Wane’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 3, 2000, pp. 52–64.Google Scholar
  94. 160.
    For a critique of the former see David Chandler, ‘The Responsibility to Protect: Imposing the “Liberal Peace”’, in Alex Bellamy and Paul Williams, ‘Peace Operations and Global Order’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, p. 60.Google Scholar
  95. 161.
    Ibid., p. 60.Google Scholar
  96. 162.
    Ibid., p. 73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oliver P. Richmond 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver P. Richmond
    • 1
  1. 1.School of International RelationsUniversity of St. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations