The Politics of Shakespeare’s Prose

  • Douglas Bruster

Abstract

During the late 1580s English playwrights developed a conventional system for picturing the world in the commercial playhouses.1 Employing an unprecedented density of representational material, such dramatists as Christopher Marlowe, George Peele, and Robert Greene offered the world as a sequence of secular actions undertaken by eloquent characters. For their plays’ eloquence these university-educated writers drew upon a rich variety of media, including diverse forms and subgenres of verse and prose alike. As important as their astounding fluency of expression in dramatic dialogue was the use of this representational variety in the service of a system that charted social distinctions among, and psychological distinctions within, linguistically self-aware characters. Ironically, the very success of these dramatists’ system would lend it a kind of cultural invisibility. Indeed, so natural does this system strike us still that, despite a renewed interest in the material basis of culture and of cultural representations, we too seldom attend to its profoundly heterogeneous outlines and effects. To shed light on a crucial element of Shakespeare’s career, I examine his adoption of this world-picturing system and how he changed it — in particular, his increasingly sophisticated, functional alternation of verse and prose in dramatic dialogue.

Keywords

Clay Dust Mercury Cage Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  1. Barish, Jonas. Ben Jonson and the Language of Prose Comedy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Bruster, Douglas and Robert Weimann. Prologues to Shakespeare’s Theatre. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll, D. Allen, ed. Greene’s Groatsworfh of Wit: Bought With a Million of Repentance. Binghamton: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, George. The Widow’s Tears, in Plays of George Chapman: The Comedies: A Critical Edition. Ed. Allan Holaday. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, George. The Poems of George Chapman. Ed. Phyllis Brooks Bartlett. New York: Russell and Russell, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. Chettle, Henry and Anthony Munday, The Downfall of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon. London: 1601.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, John. Microcosmos. The Discovery of the Little World, with the Government Thereof. London: 1603.Google Scholar
  8. Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Gascoigne, George. Certayne Notes of Instruction Concerning the Making of Verse or Rhyme in English, in Smith, ed. Elizabethan Critical Essays, 1: 46–57.Google Scholar
  10. Gascoigne, George. Gascoigne’s A Hundreth Sundrie Flowres. Ed. G. W. Pigman III. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greene, Thomas. ‘The Flexibility of the Self in Renaissance Literature.’ The Disciplines of Criticism: Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation, and History. Ed. Peter Demetz et al. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968, pp. 241–64.Google Scholar
  12. Harbage, Alfred, ed. Annals of English Drama, 975–1700. 3rd ed. Rev. by S. Schoenbaum and Sylvia Stoler Wagonheim. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. ‘The Age of the World Picture.’ The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Jonson, Ben, George Chapman, and John Marston, Eastward Ho!. Ed. C. G. Fetter. London: Ernest Benn, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Leishman, J. B., ed. The Three Parnassus Plays (1598–1601). London: Ivor Nicholson & Watson Ltd, 1949.Google Scholar
  16. Macdonald, J. F. ‘The Use of Prose in English Drama Before Shakespeare.’ University of Toronto Quarterly 2 (1933): 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marlowe, Christopher. Tamburlaine the Great, Part 1, in “Doctor Faustus” and Other Plays. Ed. David Bevington and Eric Rasmussen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Marston, John. The Dutch Courtesan, in The Selected Plays of John Marston. ed. MacDonald P. Jackson and Michael Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Marston, John. Parasitaster, or The Fawn. London: 1606.Google Scholar
  20. Medwall, Henry. Nature in The Plays Of Henry Medwall. Ed. Alan H. Nelson. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. Munro, Ian. ‘Shakespeare’s Jestbook: Wit, Print, Performance.’ ELH 71.1 (2004): 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Owen, John Isaac, ed. The Rare Triumphs of Love and Fortune. New York: Garland, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Puttenham, George. The Arte of English Poesie. Ed. Gladys Doidge Willcock and Alice Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1936; repr. 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans et al. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Harold Jenkins. London: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. Sharpe, Henry. ‘The Prose in Shakespeare’s Plays, the Rules for its Use, and the Assistance that it Gives in Understanding the Plays.’ Transactions of the New Shakespeare Society. Series 1.10 (1880–86): 523–62.Google Scholar
  27. Sidney, Philip. The Defence of Poesy, in Sir Philip Sidney: Selected Prose and Poetry. Ed. Robert Kimbrough. 2nd ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, G. G., ed. Elizabethan Critical Essays. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904; repr. London, 1959.Google Scholar
  29. Vickers, Brian. The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose. London: Methuen, 1968.Google Scholar
  30. Webbe, William A Discourse of English Poetry. In Smith, ed. Elizabethan Critical Essays, 1: 226–302.Google Scholar
  31. Weimann, Robert. Authority and Representation in Early Modern Discourse. Ed. David Hillman. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Wells, Stanley and Gary Taylor. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Willes, Richard. De re poetica. Ed. and trans. A. D. S. Fowler. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Bruster

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations