Performance and Urban Space in Shakespeare’s Rome, or ‘S.P.Q.L.’

  • D. J. Hopkins


In the decades bracketing 1600, English popular culture appropriated Rome as a valuable model for the reimagining of London and its spaces. Not only did Rome provide a precedent for those seeking to authorize and consolidate power, but it also served as a site of contest where existing social relations could be explored, reconsidered, and troubled. Caesarism was in the air, and Shakespeare’s London ‘saw its problems mirrored in the wide glass of Roman history,’2 from the references to Rome that riddle John Stow’s late Elizabethan Survey of London3 to the elaborately Romanate royal entry of James I.


Urban Space Quotation Mark Representational Strategy Representational Space Roman History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  1. Baker, David Weil. ‘“Master of the Monuments”: Memory and Erasure in Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair.’ English Literary Renaissance 31.2 (Spring 2001): 266–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, Anne. ‘Rhetoric in Ancient Rome.’ Bloom 1988. 79–89.Google Scholar
  3. Bergeron, David M. English Civic Pageantry, 1558–1672. London: Edward Arnold, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Bergeron, David M. Practicing Renaissance Scholarship: Plays and Pageants, Patrons and Politics. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, Harold, ed. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. New York: Chelsea, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, Paul A. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Diamond, Elin. Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theater. New York: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drakakis, John. ‘“Fashion It Thus”: Julius Caesar and the Politics of Theatrical Representation.’ Wilson 2002, 77–91.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.’ Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ed. Donald Bouchard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977. 139–64.Google Scholar
  11. Garber, Marjorie. Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Garber, Marjorie. ‘Dream and Interpretation: Julius Caesar.’ William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1988. 43–52.Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg, Jonathan. James I and the Politics of Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. Helms, Lorraine. ‘“The High Roman Fashion”: Sacrifice, Suicide, and the Shakespearean Stage.’ PMLA 107.3 (May 1992): 554–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopkins, DJ. ‘The Londinium Arch: Representing the Urban Subject in Performance and Print (London, 1604).’ Symbolism Yearbook. Ed. Douglass Bruster and Robert Weimann. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins DJ. and Bryan Reynolds. ‘The Making of Authorships.’ Performing Transversally: Reimagining Shakespeare and the Critical Future. New York: Palgrave, 2003. 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard, Jean. ‘Rev. of Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre by Robert Weimann.’ Shakespeare Quarterly 53.3 (Fall 2002): 390–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonson, Ben. The Royal and Magnificent Entertainment. Nichols 1828, 377–99.Google Scholar
  19. Kahn, Coppelia. Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. Liebler, Naomi Conn. ‘“Thou Bleeding Piece of Earth”: The Ritual Ground of Julius Caesar.’ Shakespeare’s Festive Tragedy: The Ritual Foundations of Genre. New York: Routledge, 1995.85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacCallum, Mungo. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and Their Background. London: Macmillan, 1910.Google Scholar
  23. Montrose, Louis. The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Montrose, Louis. ‘“Shaping Fantasies”: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture.’ Representing the English Renaissance. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988. 31–64.Google Scholar
  25. Mullaney, Steven. The Place of the Stage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. Nichols, J. B., ed. Progresses of King James the First. Vol. 1. London: Society of Antiquaries, 1828.Google Scholar
  27. Parry, Graham. The Golden Age Restor’d: The Culture of the Stuart Court, 1603–42. London: Manchester University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  28. Paster, Gail Kern. The Idea of the City in the Age of Shakespeare. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. Platt, Michael. Rome and Romans According to Shakespeare. Rev. Ed. New York: University Press of America, 1983.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, Bryan. ‘“What is the city but the people?”: Transversal Performance and Radical Politics in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus and Brecht’s Coriolan.’ Shakespeare Without Class: Misappropriations of Cultural Capital. Ed. Donald Hedrick and Bryan Reynolds. New York: Palgrave, 2000. 107–32.Google Scholar
  31. Riverside Shakespeare, The. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans and J.J.M. Tobin. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. Roach, Joseph R. Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. Ronan, Clifford. ‘Antike Roman’: Power Symbology and The Roman Play in Early Modern England, 1585–1635. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, Mark. ‘Conjuring Caesar: Ceremony, History and Authority in 1599,’ True Rites and Maimed Rites: Ritual and Anti-Ritual in Shakespeare and His Age. Ed. Linda Woodbridge and Edward Berry (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1992), 256–69.Google Scholar
  35. Schofield, John. ‘The Topography and Buildings of London, ca. 1600.’ Material London, ca. 1600. Ed. Lena Cowen Orlin. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000. 296–321.Google Scholar
  36. Schofield, John. The Building of London: From the Conquest to the Great Fire. London: Colonnade-British Museum, 1984.Google Scholar
  37. Serlio, Sebastiano. The Five Books of Architecture: An Unabridged Reprint of the English Edition of 1611. New York: Dover, 1982.Google Scholar
  38. Serpieri, Alessandro. ‘Reading the signs: Towards a Semiotics of Shakespearean Drama,’ Alternative Shakespeares. Ed. John Drakakis. London: Routledge, 1985. 119–43.Google Scholar
  39. Sheppard, Francis. London: A History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  40. Soja, Edward W. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
  41. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. ‘Translator’s Preface.’ Of Grammatology. By Jacques Derrida. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1974.Google Scholar
  42. Sterling, Brents. ‘Or Else This Were a Savage Spectacle.’ Twentieth Century Interpretations of Julius Caesar. Ed. Leonard R Dean. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 39–49.Google Scholar
  43. Stow, John. A Survey of London Written in the Year 1598. Phoenix Mill, UK: Sutton, 1994.Google Scholar
  44. Tschumi, Bernard. Event Cities. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  45. Vickers, Brian. Appropriating Shakespeare: Contemporary Critical Quarrels. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.Google Scholar
  46. Weimann, Robert. Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  47. Weimann, Robert. ‘Towards a Literary Theory of Ideology: Mimesis, Representation, Authority.’ Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. Ed. Jean E. Howard and Marion R O’Connor. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
  48. Weimann, Robert. Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wells, Charles. The Wide Arch: Roman Values in Shakespeare. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, Richard. ‘Introduction.’ Julius Caesar: Contemporary Critical Essays. Ed. Richard Wilson. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 1–28.Google Scholar
  51. Wilson, Richard. ‘“Is this a holiday?” Shakespeare’s Roman Carnival.’ Julius Caesar: Contemporary Critical Essays. Ed. Richard Wilson. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 55–74.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, Richard. Julius Caesar. London: Penguin, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Hopkins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations