Work, Welfare and Generational Order: Towards a Political Economy of Childhood

  • Helmut Wintersberger


The perception of childhood in social, economic and political theory as well as practice is vague, unclear and ambiguous. While on one side children are seen as precious beings, on the other they are perceived as a burden to their parents and to society. This ambiguity is connected with two interdependent socioeconomic and sociopolitical shifts, concerning children’s economic role and the generational division of labour on one hand and old age security, the generation contract and the welfare state on the other. In both realms this ambiguity is due to tendencies of increasing marginalization and exclusion of childhood.


Child Welfare Welfare State Generational Order Child Labour Child Poverty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G.S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A., Natalie Hevener Kaufman, Arlen Bowers Andrews, Robert M. Goerge, Bong Joo Lee and J. Lawrence Aber (2001) Measuring and Monitoring Children’s Wellbeing, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradbury, B. and M. Jäntti (1999) ‘Child Poverty across Industrialized Nations’, Innocenti Occasional Papers EPS 71, Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J. and N. Finch (2002) ‘A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries’, DWP Research Report 174, Corporate Document Services, Leeds.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, H. and P.P. Viazzo (eds) (1996) Child Labour in Historical Perspective 1800–1995, Florence: UNICEF ICDC.Google Scholar
  6. deMause, L. (1992) ‘The Evolution of Childhood’, in C. Jenks (ed.), The Sociology of Childhood: Essential Readings, Milton Keynes: Open University, pp. 48–59.Google Scholar
  7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) Why we Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission/Eurostat (2000) The Social Situation in the European Union, Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
  10. Folbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedderich, I. (2001) Einführung in die Montessori-Pädagogik, München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Hengst, H. (1981) ‘Tendenzen der Liquidierung von Kindheit’, in H. Hengst, Michael Köhler, Barbara Riedmüller and Manfred Max Wambach, Kindheit als Fiktion, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  13. Hengst, H. (1996) ‘Kinder an die Macht! Der Rückzug des Marktes aus dem Kindheitsprojekt der Moderne’, in H. Zeiher, P. Büchner and J. Zinnecker (eds), Kinder als Außenseiter? Weinheim und München: Juventa, pp. 117–33.Google Scholar
  14. Hengst, H. (2000) ‘Die Arbeit der Kinder und der Umbau der Arbeitsgesellschaft’, in H. Hengst and H. Zeiher (eds), Die Arbeit der Kinder, Weinheim and München: Juventa, pp. 71–97.Google Scholar
  15. Hernandez, D.J. (1993) America’s Children. Resources from Family, Government and the Economy, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Liebel, M. (2000) ‘Ein Recht auf Arbeit und gesellschaftliche Anerkennung. Forderungen arbeitender Kinder aus der Dritten Welt’, in H. Hengst and H. Zeiher (eds), Die Arbeit der Kinder, Weinheim and München: Juventa, pp. 241–54.Google Scholar
  17. Lüscher, K. (1996) ‘Politik für Kinder — Politik mit Kindern’, paper at the Deutschen Jugendinstitut in München.Google Scholar
  18. Munoz Vila, C. (1996) ‘The Working Child in Colombia since 1800’, in H. Cunningham and P.P. Viazzo (eds), Child Labour in Historical Perspective 1800–1995, Florence: UNICEF ICDC, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
  19. Olk, T. (2004) ‘Kinder und Kindheit im Wohlfahrtsstaat — eine vernachlässigte Kategorie?’ Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 1–2: 81–101.Google Scholar
  20. Qvortrup, J. (1995) ‘From Useful to Useful: the Historical Continuity in Children’s Constructive Participation’, Sociological Studies of Children, 7: 49–76.Google Scholar
  21. Schunter-Kleemann, S. (ed.) (1992) Herrenhaus Europa — Geschlechterverhältnisse im Wohlfahrtsstaat, Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  22. Schunter-Kleemann, S. (1997) ‘Monetary Union and Family Policies in the EU Countries’, Discussion papers 1/WE-FF Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
  23. Shamgar-Handelman, L. (1994) ‘To Whom Does Childhood Belong?’, in J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G.B. Sgritta and H. Wintersberger (eds) (1994) Childhood Matters — Social Theory, Practice and Politics, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 249–65.Google Scholar
  24. Therborn, G. (1996) ‘Child Politics: Dimensions and Perspectives’, in E. Verheilen (ed.), Monitoring Children’s Rights, The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 377–91.Google Scholar
  25. UNICEF (2000) ‘A League Table of Child Poverty in Rich Nations’, Innocenti Report Card No. 1.Google Scholar
  26. Wintersberger, H. (1996) ‘E qual è il costo di essere un bambino?’ [And what about the cost of being a child?], in F. Bimbi (ed.), Costo dei figli e diseguaglianze del genere [The cost of children and gender inequalities], Inchiesta, 111: 84–93.Google Scholar
  27. Wintersberger, H. (2000) ‘Kinder als ProduzentInnen und KonsumentInnen’, in H. Hengst and H. Zeiher (eds), Die Arbeit der Kinder, Weinheim und München: Juventa, pp. 169–88.Google Scholar
  28. Zelizer, V.A. (1985) Pricing the Priceless Child: the Changing Social Value of Children, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Helmut Wintersberger 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Wintersberger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations