Abstract
This paper examines the speed, science linkage and focus of corporate R&D, as well as new entry matter, as the determinants of R&D performance of the IT (information technology) sector,1 and discusses the recent R&D performance of US, Japanese and European firms from this perspective. We use the number of (forward) patent citations per patent and the number of patents as the performance measures of R&D, both based on US patents. Past studies suggest that the patent citation provides very useful information on the value of patents.2 In particular, citation per patent of a firm is significantly correlated with its market value (Deng et al., 1999; Hall et al., 2000; Hirschey and Richardson, 2001, 2004; and Nagaoka, 2005). Given the extreme heterogeneity of the value of patents (see, for example, Scherer and Harhoff, 2000), it is important to use both quality and quantity measures of patents in assessing the R&D performance of a firm. The R&D performance of US firms in the IT sector improved significantly relative to the rest of the world in the 1990s in both of these two respects. The average citation per patent of the US firms is 28 per cent higher than that of the Japanese firms for the patents granted for the 1983–7 period, but it is 73 per cent higher than that of the Japanese firms for the patents granted for the 1993–7 period (see Figure 8.1).3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Branstetter, L., ‘Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations’, NBER Working Paper 9438 (2003).
Branstetter, L. and Y. Nakamura, ‘Is Japan’s Innovative Capacity in Decline?’, mimeo (2003).
Caballero, R. J. and A. B. Jaffe, ‘How High are the Giants’ Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillover and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth’, in O. Blanchard and S. Fischer (eds), National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Manual, Vol. 8 (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993).
Council of Economic Advisors, Economic Report of the President (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2001).
Deng, Z., B. Lev and F. Narin, ‘Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance’, Financial Analysts Journal, 55 (3) (1999), 20–32.
Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, ‘Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look’, NBER Working Paper 7741 (2000).
Harhoff, D., F. M. Scherer and K. Vopel, ‘Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights’, Research Policy, 32 (8) (2003), 1343–63.
Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn, ‘Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery’, RAND Journal of Economics, 27 (1) (1996), 32–59.
Hirschey, M. and V. J. Richardson, ‘Valuation Effects of Patent Quality: A Comparison for Japanese and US firms’, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9 (2001), 65–82.
Hirschey, M. and V. J. Richardson, ‘Are Scientific Indicators of Patent Quality Useful to Investors?’, Journal of Empirical Finance, 11 (2004), 91–107.
Jaffe, A. B. and M. Trajtenberg, ‘Flows of Knowledge from Universities and Federal Labs: Modeling the Flow of Patent Citations over Time and across Institutional and Geographic Boundaries’, NBER Working Paper 5712 (1996).
Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg and M. S. Fogarty, ‘The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve Survey of Patentees’, in A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (eds), Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002).
Kortum, S. and J. Lerner, ‘What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?’, Research Policy, 28 (1999), 1–22.
Meyer, M., ‘Does Science Push Technology? Patents Citing Scientific Literature’, Research Policy, 29 (2000), 409–34.
Nagaoka, S., ‘Assessing the R&D Management of Firms by Patent Citation: Evidence from the US Patents’, IIR Working Paper WP#04–10, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University (2004).
Nagaoka, S., ‘Patent Quality, Cumulative Innovation and Market Value: Evidence from Japanese Firm Level Panel Data’, IIR Working Paper 05–06, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University (2005).
Narin, F., ‘Tech-Line Background Paper’, in J. Tidd (ed.), From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence, Series on Technology Management, Vol. 3 (London: Imperial College Press, 2000), 155–95.
OECD, ‘Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2001 — Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy’ (OECD, 1998).
Rosenbloom, R. S. and W. J. Spencer, Engines of Innovation: US Industrial Research at the End of an Era (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).
Scherer, F. M. and D. Harhoff, ‘Technology Policy for a World of Skew-Distributed Outcomes’, Research Policy, 29 (2000), 559–66.
Trajtenberg, M., ‘A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovation’, RAND Journal of Economics (1990), 172–87.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Applied Econometrics Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagaoka, S. (2006). How Do the Speed, Science Linkage, Focus and New Entry Matter in IT Inventions?. In: Peeters, C., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (eds) Economic and Management Perspectives on Intellectual Property Rights. Applied Econometrics Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504745_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504745_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52589-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50474-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)