Skip to main content

Democratic Economics or Gladstonian Finance?

  • Chapter
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Lowe’s attitude to democracy, like his attitude to everything else, was utilitarian, utility in its turn requiring that no class interest dominated the others. Who should get the vote, therefore, depended on the balance of social forces as well as the level of education. In Australia, this led him to a highly provisional endorsement of general male suffrage:

Popular election is a great evil and is only to be endured because it is designed to work out a greater good. If we find the good does not exceed the evil, let us discard the principle altogether.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gillian Knight, Illiberal Liberal: Robert Lowe in New South Wales, 1842–50, Melbourne, 1966, p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bryce, Studies in Contemporary Biography, London, 1903, pp. 297–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Winter, Robert Lowe, Toronto, 1976, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Lowe, ‘Preface’, Speeches and Letters on Reform, London, 1867, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Howe, Free Trade and Liberal England, Oxford, 1997, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.F. Biagini, ‘Popular Liberals, Gladstonian Finance and the Debate on Taxation, 1860–74’ in Eugenio F. Biagini and Alastair J. Reid (eds), Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organized Labour and Party Politics in Britain, 1850–1914, Cambridge, 1991, p. 147.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Lowe, ‘Imperialism’, Fortnightly Review, 24, new series, 1 October 1878, p. 456.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arthur Patchett Martin, Life and Letters of the Right Honourable Robert Lowe, Viscount Sherbrooke, London, 1893, vol. 2, p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Lowe, ‘Mr Gladstone on Manhood Suffrage’, Fortnightly Review, 22, new series, 1 December 1877, p. 740.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Times, 23 May 1860, p. 9. Gladstone had already stated his desire that income tax payers should approximately correspond to the electorate. See Gladstone to J.L. Tabberner, 25 November 1859, quoted in H.C.G. Matthew, ‘Disraeli, Gladstone and the Politics of mid-Victorian Budgets’, Historical Journal, 22, 1979, p. 629. Matthew claims, without providing evidence, that Gladstone wanted this in order to make income tax easier to abolish.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Absurd or not, it united the Liverpool Financial Reform Association with most working-class radicals (see E.F. Biagini, Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880, Cambridge, 1992, p. 110).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 John Maloney

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maloney, J. (2005). Democratic Economics or Gladstonian Finance?. In: The Political Economy of Robert Lowe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504042_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics