Sweden: Barsebäck, Risk Management and Trust

  • Ragnar E. Löfstedt

Abstract

This case study examines the Swedish Nuclear Inspectorate’s and Sydkraft’s successful communication and management strategy in the aftermath of an INES 2 (nuclear accident of the second lowest severity) incident at the Barsebäck nuclear power plant in southern Sweden in 1992. Sydkraft (the owner of the nuclear plant) and special interest groups, such as Greenpeace Denmark, felt that the Inspectorate handled the situation, that of a near-miss meltdown of a reactor after a filter blockage, properly. The example is all the more striking because a technocratic form of risk management was used, with virtually no involvement of the public or special interest groups in the policy-making process. In addition, a top-down form of risk communication strategy was put in place rather than a dialogue form.

Keywords

Dioxide Europe Assure Boiling Vinyl 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    C. Ruden, Sven Ove Hansson, M. Johannesson and M. Wingborg, Att se till eller att titta på-om tillsynen inom miljöområdet (To see or to look at: examination within the environmental area). Ds. 1998: 50 (Stockholm: Fritzes, 1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.J. Anton, ‘Policy making and political culture in Sweden’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 4 (1969), 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Johannesson, Sven Ove Hansson, C. Ruden and M. Wingborg, ‘Risk management — the Swedish way(s)’, Journal of Environmental Management, 57 (1999), 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sven Ove Hansson, ‘Can we reverse the burden of proof?’, Toxicology Letters, 90 (1997), 223–8;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sven Ove Hansson, Setting the Limit. Occupational Health Standards and the Limits of Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    M. Micheletti, ‘Det civila samhallet och staten. Medborgarsammanslutningarnas roll I svensk politik’ (‘The civil society and the state: The role of citizen togetherness in swedish politics’) (Stockholm: Publica, 1994).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    S. Kelman, Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981), 118–19.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Stepehen Breyer, Closing the Vicious Circle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  9. Lennart J. Lundqvist, The Hare and the Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bo Rothstein, ‘Social capital in the Social Democratic State’, paper presented at Eleventh International Conference of Europeanists, Baltimore, MD, 29 Feb–1 March 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swedish Statistical Agency, Välfärd och ojämlikhet I 20-årsperspektiv 1975–1995 (Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1997), 327–9.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Ragnar E. Löfstedt, Dilemma of Swedish Energy Policy (Aldershot: Avebury, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr, Loading the Dice: A Five-Country Study of Vinyl Chloride Regulation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Although this is the case in the environmental area, it is different in the occupational health regulatory area. Today 50 per cent of the inspections by the Labour Inspectorate lead to injunctions, which is a higher number than the prosecution numbers by OSHA in the USA. See, for example, W.B. Gray and J.T. Scholz, ‘Does the regulatory enforcement work? A panel analysis of OSHA enforcement’, Law and Society Review, 27 (1993), 177–213; Johannesson et al., ‘Risk management — the Swedish way(s)’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 17.
    Lennart J. Lundqvist, Miljövårdsförvaltning och politisk struktur (Environmental administration and the political structure) (Lund: Prisma, 1971), 127.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    O. Ruin, ‘Sweden in the 1970s: Policy making becomes more difficult’, in J. Richardson (ed.), Policy Styles in Western Europe (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Thomas Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Anders Isaksson, Den Politiska Adeln: Politikens förvandling från uppdrag till yrke (The political nobility: The changing political administration from commission to profession) (Stockholm: Wahlstrom & Willstrand, 2002).Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    See, for example, D.M. Hancock, Sweden. The Politics of Postindustrial Change (Hinsdale, II: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Dryden Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    Robert C. Sahr, The Politics of Energy Policy Change in Sweden (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1985), 16.Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    S. Westerlund, EG och makten över miljön The EC and the power over environment (Stockholm: Naturskyddsforeningen, 1992).Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    R.E. Löfstedt, Risk and regulation: Boat owners’ perceptions of recent antifouling legislation (Risk Management an International Journal, 3: 3 (2001) 33–45;Google Scholar
  23. R.E. Lofstedt, Swedish chemical regulation: An overview and analysis (Risk Analysis, 23: 2, 411–21; Swedish Committee on New Guidelines on Chemicals Policy, Non Hazardous Products: Proposals for implementation of new guidelines on chemicals policy SOU 2000: 53) (Stockholm, Fritzes, 2000).Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    For an overview (in Danish) regarding the history of the Danish view toward the Barsebäck nuclear plant see The Organization for Information about Nuclear Power (OOA), Hefte Beskrivende den Danske Politiske Holdning til Barsebäck (Booklet describing the Danish political perspective to Barsebäck) (Copenhagen: OOA, 1993).Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    See, for example, Måns Lönnroth, Vem Förorenar Sverige? (Who pollutes Sweden?) (Stockholm: Almäna Förlaget, 1990).Google Scholar
  26. 34.
    S. Bergqvist, De heta åren (The hot years) (Malmo: Timbro, 1985).Google Scholar
  27. 38.
    For a discussion of Swedish energy policy, please see Jonas Anshelm, Mellan frälsning och domedag: Om kärnkraftens politiska idehistoria i Sverige 1945–1999 (Between salvation and doomsday: About nuclear power’s political idea history in Sweden 1945–1999) (Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokforlag Symposion, 2000);Google Scholar
  28. J.M. Jasper, Nuclear Politics — Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France (Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 1990); Löfstedt, Dilemma of Swedish Energy Policy; Sahr, The Politics of Energy Policy Change in Sweden.Google Scholar
  29. 39.
    Mikael Gilljam and Sören Holmberg, Rött blått grönt. En bok om 1988 års riksdagsval (Red, blue, green: A book about 1988 year’s national election) (Stockholm: Swedish Central Statistical Bureau, 1990).Google Scholar
  30. 42.
    G. Steen, Granskningsrapport angående SKIs handläggning av det s.k.silärendet den 28 July–17 September 1992 (Evaluative study regarding the Swedish nuclear inspectorate dealing with the sieve issue the 28 July–17 September 1992) (Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Inspectorate, dnr (classification system) 1.4–921203, 1993).Google Scholar
  31. 44.
    L. Högberg, ‘Milstolpar i svenskt reaktorsamarbete’ (‘Milestones in Swedish reactor collaboration’), Nucleus, 3–4 (1999), 6–15.Google Scholar
  32. 45.
    R.E. Löfstedt, ‘Risk communication: The Barsebäck nuclear plant case’, Energy Policy, 24: 8 (1996) 689–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 49.
    M. Uhrwing, Intressepresentation i brytningstid. En studie av intressepresentation i några miljöpolitiska organ (Interest representation in times of breakage. A study of interest representation in a few political environmental institutions) (Gothenburg: Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, 1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ragnar E. Löfstedt 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ragnar E. Löfstedt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations