Abstract
Inclusion of war among the institutions of international society must at first seem shocking. Is not war symptomatic of the breakdown or failure of international society? If so, how can it be counted an institution? Surely it is obscenely euphemistic to refer to so destructive a process by a word so closely associated in everyday use with welfare and stability. Marriage, bankruptcy, and the BBC are institutions; but war?1 The remainder of the first section of this chapter is therefore given over to an account of the kinds of things that have been understood by those, like Bull, who have thought war an institution. It attempts to sketch in merest outline naturalist, communitarian, functionalist and positivist approaches to war-as-institution as foils to an alternative pragmatist position, consistent with a possible reading of Bull, which provides the point of departure for the remainder of the argument.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Charles A. Jones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, C.A. (2006). War in the Twenty-first Century: An Institution in Crisis. In: Little, R., Williams, J. (eds) The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503915_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503915_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54220-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50391-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)