Abstract
At the end of The Anarchical Society Hedley Bull argues, with considerable force, that his argument in the book had been a contribution to the study of world politics, and not to its practice. ‘The search for conclusions that can be presented as “solutions” or “practical advice” is a corrupting element in the contemporary study of world politics’, he tells us; ‘such conclusions are advanced less because there is any solid basis for them than because there is a demand for them which it is profitable to satisfy. The fact is that while there is a great desire to know what the future of world politics will bring, and also to know how we should behave in it, we have to grope about in the dark with respect of the one as much as with respect of the other’. And he concludes, in a memorable phrase, ‘It is better to recognise that we are in darkness than to pretend that we can see the light’ (Bull, 2002: 307–8).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Nicholas J. Rengger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rengger, N.J. (2006). Seeing (Double) in the Darkness: The Moral Vision of The Anarchical Society . In: Little, R., Williams, J. (eds) The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503915_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503915_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54220-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50391-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)