Skip to main content

Dilemmas in South Africa’s Regional Strategy

Political and Economic Relations in SADC

  • Chapter
The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations ((SID))

  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

South Africa’s sub-regional strategies have evolved through different phases since the country achieved democracy in 1994 and the sub-regional dimension has since been an important preoccupation in Pretoria’s post-apartheid foreign policy. This has witnessed South Africa playing an active role in the Southern African Development Community’s (SADC) integration process and, at the official level, projecting an image of an equal partner rather than an aggressive hegemon, which was a hallmark of the apartheid regime’s regional strategy. Of course there are divergent views on the precise nature of South Africa’s approach towards the region: is it a hegemon or a partner,1 or has Pretoria used SADC as an organisational cloak to advance its own interests.2 Other commentators have argued that South Africa should play the role of a ‘pivotal state’ in the region, arguing that the country should not shy away from playing a visible leadership or even hegemonic role in the region.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Ahwireng-Obeng, F. and McGowan, P. J., ‘Partner or Hegemon? South Africa in Africa’ in Jim Broderick, et al. (eds), South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Dilemmas of a New Democracy ( London: Palgrave, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Lieberman, E., ‘Organisational Cloaking in Post-Apartheid Southern Africa: The Southern African Development Community (SADC)’, Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 34 (1997) pp. 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Habib, A. and Selinyane, N., ‘South Africa’s Foreign Policy and a Realistic Vision of an African Century’, in Elizabeth Sidropoulos (eds), South Africa’s Foreign Policy 1994–2004: Africa Past, Renaissance Future ( Johannesburg: SAIIA, 2004 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rob Davies, ‘Building a New Relationship in Southern Africa’, in Bjorn Hettne, Andras Inotai and Osvaldo Sunkel (eds), Globalism and The New Regionalism ( London: Macmillan, 1999 ) p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, I., ‘Good Governance or Good for Business: South Africa’s regionalist project and the African Renaissance’ in Shaun Breslin et al. (eds.), New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy ( London: Routledge, 2004 ) p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel, J., et al., ‘South African Expansion into Africa: Can the leopard change its spots?’ in South African Labour Bulletin, 27:5 (2003) p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helpman, A., ‘Politics and Trade Policy’ in R. E. Baldwin, et al. (eds), Market Integration, Regionalism and the Global Economy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 ) p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asante, S. K. B., Regionalism and Africa’s Development, ( Macmillan: London, 1999 ), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Dunne, T. and Schmidt, B. ‘Realism’ in John Baylis and Steve Smith (eds), The Globalization of World Politics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, Second edition, 2001 ) p. 152

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buzan, B., et al., Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1998) p. 21. Note that securitisation is often invoked by state representatives to justify using whatever means necessary to block a particular threat.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chan, S. and Primorac, R., ‘The Imagination of Land and the Reality of Seizure: Zimbabwe’s Complex Reinventions’, Journal of International Affairs, 57:2 (2004) p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Taylor, I. and Williams, P., ‘The Limits of Engagement: British Foreign Policy and the Crisis in Zimbabwe’, International Affairs, 78:3 (2002) pp. 547–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, I., ‘The New Partnership for Africa’s Development and the Zimbabwe Elections: Implications and Prospects for the Future’, African Affairs, 101:404 (2002) pp. 403–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alden, C. and Schoeman, M., ‘The Hegemon that Wasn’t: South Africa’s Foreign Policy towards Zimbabwe’, Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 25:1 (2003) pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Mzukisi Qobo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qobo, M. (2006). Dilemmas in South Africa’s Regional Strategy. In: Lee, D., Taylor, I., Williams, P.D. (eds) The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503830_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics