Abstract
There can be no doubt that multilateralism has become a central plank of the ‘new’ South Africa’s diplomacy. It is also apparent that the African National Congress (ANC) government has little option but to cultivate a robust multilateral diplomatic strategy. As a developing middle power state, South Africa lacks the opportunities and capabilities to achieve its foreign policy goals unilaterally. Like many states South Africa has a limited ability to influence — let alone set the agenda of — most international institutions. This includes Pretoria’s struggle to facilitate multilateral cooperation within its own region/sub-region because many of its neighbours either resent or are very wary of its influence within Africa in general and Southern Africa in particular. Unilateral options are rare for Pretoria — such opportunities remain the privilege of more powerful actors such as the United States, the European Union and China. And in any case, multilateral institutions matter since they now regulate much of the security, economic, and judicial dimensions of the international system, with a remit of governance that is continually expanding into all areas of economic, social and political life at the international, regional, sub-regional and domestic levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Taylor, I. and Vale, P. ‘South Africa’s Transition Revisited: Globalisation as Vision and Virtue’, Global Society, 14:3 (2000) pp. 399–414.
Nel, P. (1999) ‘Conceptions of Globalisation among the South African Elite’, Global Dialogue, 4:1 (April) p. 35.
Lee, K. (1995) ‘A Neo-Gramscian Approach to International Organization: An Expanded Analysis of Current Reforms to UN Development Activities’ in A. Linklater and J. Macmillan (eds), Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995, p. 156.
See Ian Taylor ‘South Africa: Beyond the Impassse in Global Governance’ in John English, Ramesh Thakur and Andrew Cooper (eds), Reforming from the Top: A Leaders’ 20 Summit (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2005) pp. 230–59.
See James Barber ‘The New South Africa’s Foreign Policy: Principles and Practice’ International Affairs 81:5 (2005) pp. 1079–96.
See Taylor, I., ‘The Contradictions and Continuities of South African Trade Policy’ in Dominic Kelly and Wyn Grant (eds) The Politics of International Trade: Actors, Issues, and Regional Dynamics ( Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005 ) pp. 295–308.
See Alden, C. and Soko, M., ‘South Africa’s Economic Relations with Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 43:3 (2005) pp. 367–92.
See Taylor, I., NEPAD: Towards Africa’s Development or Another False Start? ( Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Donna Lee, Ian Taylor and Paul D. Williams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, D., Taylor, I., Williams, P.D. (2006). Conclusions. In: Lee, D., Taylor, I., Williams, P.D. (eds) The New Multilateralism in South African Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503830_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503830_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28129-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50383-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)