Abstract
Traditional linguistics, or the mainstream philosophy of language on which it is based, has a number of analyses to offer in order to account for such a sentence. We could, for instance, suggest a syntactic analysis: the sentence is in the imperative mood, it has also been the object of what was once called the negative transformation. We could, in the style of functional grammars or of enunciation linguistics, account for the presence of the grammatical marker ‘do’, that is, account for the mental operation which it inscribes within language. We could also speak the language of pragmatics, and show that the speech-act of which the sentence is the bearer is an indirect one: the imperative suggests the sentence is an order, but the presence of ‘please’ suggests that, on the contrary, it is rather a prayer (even as the canonical ‘please could you pass me the salt’ appears to be a request for information when it is really a disguised or weakened order). Lastly, we might try and account for the name as a rigid designator, in the approved manner of Kripke.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2004 Jean-Jacques Lecercle and Denise Riley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lecercle, JJ. (2004). Introduction. In: The Force of Language. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503793_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503793_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52139-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50379-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)