Fianna Fáil and the Working Class, 1926–38

  • Richard Dunphy

Abstract

The relationship between a political party and the social classes from which it draws support is multifaceted and fraught with conceptual difficulties. In proposing to examine Fianna Fáil’s relationship with the working class in Ireland during the party’s formative years I am certainly not supposing that there is any easy or straightforward relationship between social class membership (itself a problematic category) and electoral or political behaviour. Rather, I have explicitly argued elsewhere1 that both the ‘vulgar Marxist’ tendency towards economic reductionism and romantic leftism’s instinctive explanation for the weakness of working-class politics and the failure of socialist revolution to materialise — ‘betrayal’ of the working class by its ‘leaders’ — must be eschewed if we are to get to grips with the complexities of politics.2 In my previous work on Fianna Fáil3 I have attempted to analyse its rise to hegemony in the Ireland of the 1930s in the context of a successful political strategy that incorporated large swathes of working-class, small farmer, petty bourgeois and déclassé support behind a project that aimed at the transformation of Irish society through the consolidation of a new national bourgeoisie. In the process, the party succeeded in outflanking various romantic republican leftist movements that sporadically questioned its leadership, outpolled the Labour Party amongst urban workers, and divided and contained the organised trade union movement.

Keywords

Depression Europe Coherence Assure Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Richard Dunphy, ‘The enigma of Fianna Fáil: party strategy, social classes and the politics of hegemony’, in M. Cronin and J.M. Regan (eds.), Ireland: The Politics of Independence, 1922–1949 (Basingstoke, 2000).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Richard Dunphy, The Making of Fianna Fáil Power in Ireland, 1923–1948 (Oxford, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 6.
    B.C. Smith, Understanding Third World Politics: Theories of Political Change and Development (Basingstoke, 1996), p. 202.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Margaret Canovan, ‘Trust the people? Populism and the two faces of democracy’, Political Studies, vol. 47, no. 1 (March 1999), pp. 2–16 — from which subsequent quotations are taken.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 10.
    John A. Murphy, Ireland in the Twentieth Century (Dublin, 1975), pp. 111–12.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    C.S. Andrews, Man of No Property (Dublin, 1982), p. 29.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Benjamín Arditi, ‘Populism as a spectre of democracy: a reply to Canovan’, Political Studies, vol. 52, no. 1 (March 2004), p. 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 18.
    J.J. Lee and Gearóid Ó Tuathaigh, The Age of de Valera (Dublin, 1983), p. 104.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Stefano Bartolini, The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage (Cambridge, MA, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 24.
    M. Mann, ‘Sources of variation in working-class movements in twentieth century Europe’, New Left Review, vol. 212 (July/August 1995), pp. 14–54.Google Scholar
  11. 30.
    D.R. O’Connor Lysaght, ‘The rake’s progress of a syndicalist. The political career of William O’Brien, Irish labour leader’, Saothar: Journal of Irish Labour History, vol. 9 (1985), pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
  12. 32.
    Ellen Hazelkorn, ‘Rejoinder to Enda McKay, “The Irish Labour Party, 1927–1933”’, Saothar: Journal of Irish Labour History, vol. 12 (1987), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Donal Ó Drisceoil 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Dunphy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations