Advertisement

Body and Soul: Nature, the Host and Folklore in The Picture of Dorian Gray

  • Jarlath Killeen
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

In the previous chapter I concentrated on demonstrating Oscar Wilde’s dedication to undermining what Speranza called the ‘common-sense’, literalist focus of English society. This focus manifested itself in the commitment to the plenary inspiration of the Bible by most Protestant churches, a commitment which involved reading every statement of the Bible on every subject as literally true. The depth of this commitment to literal reading caused the Protesting churches extreme epistemological difficulty when the Higher Criticism undermined sola scriptum religion. Empirically based religion was undermined by an empirically based methodology of reading. However, the issue of the English literal imagination is also of vital concern when examining Wilde’s only novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, because the novel form itself was at the centre of debates about the application of empiricism in the nineteenth century. It is important to note that, while the novel was issued in two very different editions — the first in Lippincott’s Monthly Magazine in 1890, the second as a very revised single volume in 1891 — it is only with the second of these editions I will be concerned with here. I will detail below how interpreting Dorian Gray as an intervention in the debate about the relationship between the novel and reality in the nineteenth century can help in clearing up the rather confusing question of what exactly Wilde was trying to do in his literary experiment.

Keywords

Foreign Plant Colonial Discourse Spiritual Quest Catholic Theology Natural Virtue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957), 204–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maria Edgeworth, Belinda, ed. Kathryn Kirkpatrick (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 3.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Literature and Dogma: an Essay towards a Better Appreciation of the Bible, The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, vol. 6: Dissent and Dogma, ed. R. H. Super (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968), 146.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    David Lodge, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature (London: Edward Arnold, 1977), 25.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    George Eliot, Essays of George Eliot, ed. Thomas Pinney (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), 271.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    The text used is here is The Picture of Dorian Gray, Authoritative Texts, Backgrounds, Reviews and Reactions, Criticism, ed. Donald L. Lawler (New York-London: Norton, 1988). Page numbers will appear in parentheses in the main text.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Kerry Powell, ‘The Mesmerizing of Dorian Gray’, Victorian Newsletter 65 (1984), 10–15; idem, ‘Tom, Dick and Dorian Gray: Magic Picture Mania in Late-Victorian Fiction’, Philological Quarterly 62 (Spring 1983), 147–70.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Isobel Murray, ‘Introduction’, in Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, ed. Isobel Murray (Oxford English Novels; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974), vii–xxv (xx). For another non-realist reading of the novel, see Joyce Carol Oates, ‘The Picture of Dorian Gray: Wilde’s Parable of the Fall’, Contraries: Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), 3–16. The one critic I have come across who dissents from this view is Shelton Waldrep who claims that Dorian Gray is a realist novel: ‘Wilde had to work within the confines of some specific variation on the theme of realism’, ‘The Aesthetic Realism of Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray’, Studies in the Literary Imagination 29.1 (Spring 1996), 103–12 (103).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    It should be noted that McCormack insists that ‘it is impossible to know whether Gray was Wilde’s lover’. John Gray: Poet, Dandy and Priest (Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press of New England, 1991), 88. Balancing the probabilities it is unlikely that some form of sexual relationship did not emerge between the two of them. For Wilde and Gray, see also McCormack’s more recent The Man Who Was Dorian Gray (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000). I find this second work more problematic than the first which was a straight biography. In this second work McCormack bravely tries to do something new: ‘I resolved... to place the fragments of Gray’s life before the reader … and to piece them together with a kind of fictive glue’, x–xi. 19. Neil McKenna, The Secret Life of Oscar Wilde (London: Arrow Books, 2004), 178.Google Scholar
  10. 24.
    For Huysmans and Dorian Gray, see Walther Fischer, ‘The “Poisonous Book” in Oskar Wilde’s Dorian Gray’, Englische Studien 51: 1 (1917), 37–47Google Scholar
  11. Lucius Cook, ‘French Sources of Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray’, Romantic Review 19 (1928), 25–34; Schuchard, ‘Wilde’s Dark Angel’, 378–81.Google Scholar
  12. 26.
    John Pick, ‘Divergent Disciples of Walter Pater’, Thought 23 (March 1948), 114–28 (121).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 28.
    See Ellis Hanson’s account of Pater in Decadence and Catholicism, 169–228; see also Gerald Monsman, ‘Pater’s Aesthetic Hero’, University of Toronto Quarterly 40: 2 (1971), 136–51.Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    Terri A. Hasseler, ‘The Physiological Determinism Debate in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray’, The Victorian Newsletter 84 (Fall 1993), 31–5 (31).Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    John Wilson Foster, ‘Against Nature? Science and Oscar Wilde’, Wilde the Irishman, ed. Jerusha McCormack (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), 113–24 (117).Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Heather Seagroatt, ‘Hard Science, Soft Psychology, and Amorphous Art in The Picture of Dorian Gray’, Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 38: 4 (1998), 741–59 (741).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 37.
    Edward Norman, Roman Catholicism in England from the Elizabethan Settlement to the Second Vatican Council (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), 51.Google Scholar
  18. 47.
    Caroline Walker Bynum, Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion (New York: Zone Books, 1991), 255.Google Scholar
  19. 49.
    Terry Eagleton, The Idea of Culture (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 89.Google Scholar
  20. 55.
    From The Wild Garden, quoted in Miles Hadfield’s A History of British Gardening (London: John Murray, 1979), 362.Google Scholar
  21. 56.
    Ibid. See also Todd Longstaffe-Gowan’s recently published The London Town Garden, 1700–1840 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  22. 57.
    See L. P. Curtis, Apes and Angels: the Irishman in Victorian Caricature (Newton Abbot: David and Charles, 1971).Google Scholar
  23. 58.
    Charles Kingsley, His Letters and Memories of His Life, ed. Francis E. Kingsley (London: Macmillan, 1901), vol. 3, 111.Google Scholar
  24. 59.
    Reproduced in Lloyd Lewis and Henry Justin Smith, Oscar Wilde Discovers America, 1882 (New York: Benjamin Blom, 1967), facing 82, 101.Google Scholar
  25. 60.
    This is the general argument of Arnold’s ‘On the Study of Celtic Literature’, The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, vol. 3, Lectures and Essays in Criticism, ed. R. H. Super, assist. Sister Marion Hoctor (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962), 291–386.Google Scholar
  26. 61.
    David Upchurch, Wilde’s Use of Irish Celtic Elements in The Picture of Dorian Gray (New York: Peter Lang, 1992), 25–6.Google Scholar
  27. 64.
    See Joep Leerssen, Remembrance and Imagination: Patterns in the Literary Representations of Ireland in the Nineteenth Century (Cork: Cork University Press in association with Field Day, 1996), 68–156, for a detailed and thorough discussion of all aspects of antiquarian interest in Ireland in the nineteenth century.Google Scholar
  28. 65.
    Curtis Marez, ‘The Other Addict: Reflections on Colonialism and Oscar Wilde’s Opium Smoke Screen’, English Literary History 64 (1997), 257–87 (272).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 66.
    See also Mary King, ‘Typing Dorian Gray: Wilde and the Interpellated Text’, Irish Studies Review 9: 1 (2001), 15–24 (16). My thanks to the author for sending me a copy of this article.Google Scholar
  30. 67.
    House of Commons Speech, 8 April 1888. Quoted in D. G. Boyce, ‘ “The Marginal Britons”: the Irish’, Englishness: Politics and Culture, 1880–1920, ed. Robert Colls and Phillip Dodd (London: Croom Helm, 1986), 230–53 (234–5).Google Scholar
  31. 68.
    Theodore Wratislaw, Oscar Wilde: a Memoir (London: Eighteen Nineties Society, 1979), 13.Google Scholar
  32. 70.
    Lecture contained in Kevin O’ Brien, Oscar Wilde in Canada: an Apostle for the Arts (Toronto: Personal Library, 1982), 62–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jarlath Killeen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jarlath Killeen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KeeleUK

Personalised recommendations