Advertisement

Faith and Reason: the Bible, the Catholic Church and Wilde’s Scandalous Writings

  • Jarlath Killeen
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

In the previous chapter I discussed how the Catholic Church was construed, by both the English public and the intelligentsia, as a sexually scandalous institution within Victorian England. I also demonstrated that the folk-Catholic beliefs of the Irish peasantry of the west were considered theologically and (at times) sexually transgressive by the institutional Catholic Church in that country. The scandalous nature of the Catholicism Wilde encountered in both Ireland and Oxford formed part of the attraction he felt for this ‘outlawed’ religion. Of course, some of Wilde’s own writings were considered scandalous themselves, and in this chapter we will turn to two of these works: The Portrait of Mr. W. H. and Salome, and consider how religious issues can contribute to an interpretation of both.

Keywords

High Criticism Catholic Ideal Biblical Narrative Protestant Theologian Irish Famine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    H. Montgomery Hyde, ed., The Trials of Oscar Wilde (Edinburgh: William Hodge, 1948), 130.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kevin Kopelson, ‘Wilde, Barthes, and the Orgasmics of Truth’, Genders 7 (1990), 22–31 (29).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isobel Murray, ‘Introduction’, Oscar Wilde: Complete Shorter Fiction, ed. Isobel Murray (London: Oxford University Press, 1979), 1–18 (13).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawrence Danson, ‘Oscar Wilde, W. H., and the Unspoken Name of Love’, English Literary History 58: 4 (Winter 1991), 979–1000 (981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologia, Part II, II, Q. 1, Article 4, quoted in John Hick, Faith and Knowledge (London: Macmillan, 1967), 14.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Edward Stillingfleet, A Rational Account of the Grounds of the Protestant Religion (London, 1665), 109, 111.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Gerald R. Cragg, From Puritanism to the Age of Reason: a Study of Changes in Religious Thought within the Church of England, 1660 to 1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950), 42–59Google Scholar
  8. Barbara J. Shapiro, Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth Century England: a Study of the Relationship between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 106–7.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Raymond D. Tumbleson, Catholicism in the English Protestant Imagination: Nationalism, Religion, and Literature, 1660–1745 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 101.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    John Rogerson, Old Testament Criticism in the Nineteenth Century: England and Germany (London: SPCK, 1984), 250.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    On the impact of the Higher Criticism, see Gerald Parsons, ‘Biblical Criticism in Victorian Britain: From Controversy to Acceptance?’, Religion in Victorian Britain, vol. 2, Controversies, ed. Gerald Parsons (Manchester University Press, 1988), 238–57.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    For this Quest, see Albert Schweitzer, The Quest of the Historical Jesus: a Critical Study of Its Progress from Reimarus to Wrede, trans. W. Montgomery, intro. James M. Robinson (New York: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar
  13. See also D. L. Pals, The Victorian ‘Lives of Jesus’ (San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press, 1982), 32–50.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    C. C Gillispie, Genesis and Geology (New York: Harper and Row, 1959).Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Joss Lutz Marsh, ‘ “Bibliolatry” and “Bible-Smashing”: G. W. Foote, George Meredith, and the Heretic Trope of the Book’, Victorian Studies 34: 3 (Spring 1991), 315–36.Google Scholar
  16. See also Marsh’s book, Word Crimes: Blasphemy, Culture, and Literature in Nineteenth-Century England (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    This was succinctly expressed by a letter by one Henry Sidgwick to The Times on 20 February 1861, which pointed out that ‘what we all want is, briefly, not a condemnation, but a refutation … a large portion of the laity now … will not be satisfied by an ex cathedra shelving of the question, nor terrified by a deduction of awful consequences from the new speculation. For philosophy and history alike have taught them to seek not what is “safe” but what is true.’ Quoted in Josef L. Altholz, ‘The Warfare of Conscience with Theology’, Religion in Victorian Britain, vol. 3, Interpretations, ed. Gerald Parsons (Manchester University Press, 1988), 150–69 (166–7).Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Stephen Arata, ‘Oscar Wilde and Jesus Christ’, Wilde Writings: Contextual Conditions, ed. Joseph Bristow (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003), 254–72 (262).Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Guy Willoughby, Art and Christhood: the Aesthetic of Oscar Wilde (London and Cranbury, New Jersey: Associated University Presses, 1993), 115.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    The text for this chapter is taken from the Collins Complete Works of Oscar Wilde, ed. Merlin Holland (London: Harper Collins, 1999), which is the only readily available edition which prints Wilde’s revised text.Google Scholar
  21. For the best study of the textual history of Mr. W. H., see Horst Schroeder, Oscar Wilde, The Portrait of Mr. W. H. — Its Composition, Publication and Reception (Braunschweig: Technische Universität Braunschweig, 1984).Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    See, for example, George C. Macauley, ‘New Views of Shakespeare’s Sonnets: the “Other Poet” Identified’, Blackwood’s Magazine 135 (June 1884), 727–61; 137 (June 1885), 774–800; 139 (March 1886), 327–50.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    ‘An attachment to some female, which seems to have touched neither his heart nor his fancy very sensibly, was overpowered, without entirely ceasing, by one to a friend; and this last is of such an enthusiastic character, and so extravagant in the phrases that the author uses, as to have thrown an unaccountable mystery over the whole work … and it is impossible not to wish that Shakespeare had never written them. There is a weakness and folly in all excessive and mis-placed affection, which is not redeemed by the touches of nobler sentiments.’ Henry Hallam, Introduction to the Literature of Europe, 3 vols (1837–39; rpt, New York: Johnson, 1970), vol. 2, 504.Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    For a clear analysis of the emergence of the categories of the ‘homosexual’ and ‘heterosexual’, see Alan Sinfield, The Wilde Century: Effeminacy, Oscar Wilde, and the Queer Movement (London: Cassell, 1994).Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    Lawrence Danson, Wilde’s Intentions: the Artist in His Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), 106.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Joseph Bristow, ‘“A complex multiform creature”: Wilde’s Sexual Identities’, The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde, ed. Peter Raby (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 195–218 (197).Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    For ‘muscular Protestantism’, see Norman Vance, Sinews of the Spirit: the Ideal of Christian Manliness in Victorian Literature and Religious Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    Linda Dowling, Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1994), 124.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    Timothy d’Arch Smith, Love in Earnest: Some Notes on the Lives and Writings of English Vranian’ Poets from 1889 to 1930 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970).Google Scholar
  30. 33.
    David Norton, A History of the Bible as Literature, vol. 2, From 1700 to the Present Day (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 180.Google Scholar
  31. 35.
    For the replacement of religion by science as the metanarrative of the nineteenth century, see Stephen Prickett, Words and The Word: Language, Poetics and Biblical Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 36.
    John Henry Newman, Apologia pro Vita Sua (London: Fount Paperback, 1977), 218–19.Google Scholar
  33. 37.
    John Henry Newman, Letters and Diaries, eds Charles Stephen Dessain et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961-), vol. 19, 482.Google Scholar
  34. 39.
    Quoted in Brand Blanshard, Reason and Belief (London: Unwin, 1974), 31.Google Scholar
  35. 44.
    The text for this section is taken from Lady Windermere’s Fan, Salome, A Woman of No Importance, An Ideal Husband, and The Importance of Being Earnest, ed. Peter Raby (Oxford Drama Library; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 61–92. This takes its text of Salome from the first English edition. All page numbers of quotations will be placed in parentheses in the main text.Google Scholar
  36. 45.
    Joris-Karl Huysmans, Against Nature, trans. Robert Baldick (London: Penguin, 1959), 64.Google Scholar
  37. 46.
    Gustave Flaubert, Trois Contes (Paris: Gallimard, 1973).Google Scholar
  38. 47.
    For a good study of these sources, see Françoise Meltzer, Salome and the Dance of Writing: Portraits of Mimesis in Literature (Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. See also Ewa Kuryluk, Salome and Judas in the Cave of Sex: the Grotesque: Origins, Iconography, Techniques (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  40. 48.
    Peter Raby, Oscar Wilde (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 105.Google Scholar
  41. 49.
    Norbert Kohl, Oscar Wilde: the Works of a Conformist Rebel, transi. David Henry Wilson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 192.Google Scholar
  42. 50.
    Christa Satzinger, The French Influences on Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray and Salome (Lampeter: Edwin Meilen Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  43. 52.
    Bram Dijkstra, Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of Feminine Evil in Fin-de-Siècle Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), 384.Google Scholar
  44. 53.
    Edmund Bergler, ‘“Salome”, the Turning Point in the Life of Oscar Wilde’, Psychoanalysis Review 43: 1 (1956), 97–103 (100).Google Scholar
  45. 54.
    Kate Millett, Sexual Politics (London: Hart-Davis, 1971), 152–6.Google Scholar
  46. 55.
    Victoria White, ‘Women of No Importance: Misogyny in the Work of Oscar Wilde’, Wilde the Irishman, ed. Jerusha McCormack (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1998), 158–65 (163)Google Scholar
  47. see also Irene Eynat-Confino, ‘Oscar Wilde and Dramatic Strategies’, Rediscovering Oscar Wilde, ed. C. George Sandulescu (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe, 1994), 127–36.Google Scholar
  48. 56.
    Charles Bernheimer, ‘Fetishism and Decadence: Salome’s Severed Heads’, Fetishism as Cultural Discourse, eds Emily Apter and William Pietz (Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press, 1993), 72–83 (76). Google Scholar
  49. 57.
    Jane Marcus, ‘Salome: the Jewish Princess Was a New Woman’, Bulletin of the New York Public Library 78 (1974–75), 95–113.Google Scholar
  50. 58.
    For Wilde’s manipulation of the Salome tradition, see Helen Grace Zagona, The Legend of Salome and the Principle of Art for Art’s Sake (Geneva: Ambilly-Annemasse, 1960)Google Scholar
  51. Robert C. Schweik, ‘Oscar Wilde’s Salome, the Salome Theme in Late European Art, and a Problem of Method in Cultural History’, Twilight of Dawn: Studies in English Literature in Transition, ed. O. M. Brack, Jr (Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 1987), 123–36Google Scholar
  52. Austin E. Quigley, ‘Realism and Symbolism in Wilde’s Salomé’, Modern Drama 37 (1994), 104–19.Google Scholar
  53. 59.
    Quoted in John Russell Stephens, The Censorship of English Drama, 1824–1901 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 112.Google Scholar
  54. 63.
    Caroline Walker Bynum, Holy Feast and Holy Fast: the Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1987), 174–5.Google Scholar
  55. 65.
    Quoted in E. R. Norman, Anti-Catholicism in Victorian England (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1968), 174.Google Scholar
  56. 67.
    Quoted in Karl Beckson, ed., Oscar Wilde: the Critical Heritage (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970) 139–40.Google Scholar
  57. 69.
    See Desmond Bowen, The Protestant Crusade in Ireland, 1800–70: a Study of Protestant-Catholic Relations between the Act of Union and Disestablishment (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1978).Google Scholar
  58. 71.
    See R. S. Brooke, Recollections of the Irish Church (London: Macmillan, 1877)Google Scholar
  59. James Godkin, Ireland and Her Churches (London: Chapman and Hall, 1867).Google Scholar
  60. 73.
    See Peter Gray, Famine, Land and Politics: British Government and Irish Society 1843–50 (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1999), passim, for the reading of the Famine as a providential act of God.Google Scholar
  61. 77.
    Nicholas Joost and Franklin E. Court, ‘Salome, the Moon, and Oscar Wilde’s Aesthetics: a Reading of the Play’, Papers on Language and Literature 8 (1972), 96–111.Google Scholar
  62. 78.
    Patrick O’Farrell, ‘Millennialism, Messianism and Utopianism in Irish History’, Anglo-Irish Studies 2 (1976), 45–68.Google Scholar
  63. 79.
    Brian Stanley, The Bible and the Flag: Protestant Missions and British Imperialism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Leicester: Apollos, 1990).Google Scholar
  64. 80.
    Irene Whelan, ‘The Stigma of Souperism’, The Great Irish Famine, ed. Cathal Poirteir (Cork: Mercier Press, 1995), 135–54 (144).Google Scholar
  65. 82.
    Quoted in G. D. Zimmerman, ed., Songs of Irish Rebellion: Political Street Ballads and Rebel Songs, 1780–1900 (Dublin: Allen Figgis, 1967), 34.Google Scholar
  66. 89.
    Katherine Worth, Oscar Wilde (London: Macmillan, 1983), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 93.
    James S. Donnelly Jr, ‘Pastorini and Captain Rock: Millenarianism and Sectarianism in the Rockite Movement of 1821–4’, Irish Peasants: Violence and Political Unrest, 1780–1914, eds Samuel Clarke and James S. Donnelly Jr (Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983), 102–39.Google Scholar
  68. 94.
    Angela Bourke, ‘The Virtual Reality of Irish Fairy Legend’, Éire-Ireland 31: 1–2 (1996), 7–25 (7, 20).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jarlath Killeen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jarlath Killeen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KeeleUK

Personalised recommendations