Abstract
Discussions got underway at the UNPA on the morning of Thursday 19 February. Although de Soto called on the two sides to avoid divulging any details of the discussions to the press, reports soon emerged that the first two-hour meeting had been constructive and business-like in its tone.1 This impression was seeming confirmed by an announcement from the UN that the two negotiating teams would meet every weekday morning, with extra meetings as necessary, instead of the originally planned two or three meetings a week. However, Papadopoulos soon painted another picture of the developments. Speaking upon his return to the presidential palace after the first session, he claimed that Denktash was still calling for changes that were outside of the scope of the Annan Plan and had even questioned the fundamental principles of the proposals.2 Speaking just hours later, Iacovou explained that the Turkish Cypriot leader wanted to alter the terminology and basic territorial provisions of the plan. Iacovou also issued a warning. If the Turkish side continued to try to go beyond the basic parameters of the plan, the Greek Cypriots would follow suit.3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 James Ker-Lindsay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2005). The Final Phase. In: EU Accession and UN Peacemaking in Cyprus. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503519_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503519_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54590-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50351-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)