Skip to main content

Introduction and Overview

  • Chapter
  • 38 Accesses

Part of the book series: Global Issues Series ((GLOISS))

Abstract

The norm against the deliberate use of poison and disease in warfare can be traced back several hundred if not thousand years. This ‘taboo’ became embodied in the 20th century in three international treaties which form the basis of the two chemical and biological weapons prohibition regimes that are still today the major instruments in the fight against the spread of biological and chemical weapons proliferation and use. The three legal instruments are the 1925 Geneva Protocol, the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See D. E. Kaplan and A. Marshall, The Cult at the End of the World (London: Hutchinson, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Leitenberg, ‘The Experience of the Japanese Aum Shinrikyo Group and Biological Agents’, in B. Roberts (ed.), Hype or Reality: the ‘New Terrorism’ and Mass Casualty Attacks (Alexandria, VA: CBACI, 2000), pp.159–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See M. R. Dando, Preventing Biological Warfare. The Failure of American Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See Chapter 4 for a discussion of these experiments.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See M. A. Levy et al., ‘The Study of International Regimes’, European Journal of International Relations, 1 (3), 1995, 267–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hasenclever, P. Mayer and V. Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Hasenclever, P. Mayer and V. Rittberger, Fair Burden-Sharing and the Robustness of International Regimes: the Case of Food Aid, Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur International Politik und Friedensforschung Nr.31, Tübingen, 1998, p.1, emphasis in original.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Müller et al., Regime unter Stress. Beharrungs- und Anpassungsleistungen internationaler Regime unter den Bedingungen existenzgefåhrdender Herausforderungen (Frankfurt/Main: PRIF, February 1999), unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller et al., Regime unter Stress, pp.10–11, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Alexander Kelle, Kathryn Nixdorff and Malcolm Dando

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelle, A., Nixdorff, K., Dando, M. (2006). Introduction and Overview. In: Controlling Biochemical Weapons. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503496_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics