Why Literature—not the People—Rose

  • Anthony S. Jarrells
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism, and Cultures of Print book series (PERCP)


The past decade of literary study witnessed a host of arguments concerning the making of the English canon and the rise of Literature with a capital “L.” From changing reading habits to the displacement of religion, from an expansion of print to a “disciplinary” displacement of philosophy, eighteenth-century critics have posited a variety of answers to the question of how and why literature rose when it did.1 In one sense, this may be a continuation of a trend in eighteenth-century studies particularly, one whereby critics chart the rise of this or that in eighteenth-century Britain: the novel, the public sphere, the people, the domestic woman, liberalism, capitalism, civility, literature. But in another sense, it marks a critical self-consciousness about the profession itself, one that seeks to answer for the present crises of the discipline.2


Eighteenth Century French Revolution Late Eighteenth Century Woman Writer Good Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Anthony S. Jarrells 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony S. Jarrells

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations