Abstract
The last chapter looked at how we can encourage a more creative attitude to language among students. In doing so, it took the traditional view that metaphor represented a different or unusual use of language, and used this assumption to encourage students to play more freely with meanings. That play was constructed around a copula model of metaphor. A copula metaphor is one constructed using the copula verb, ‘be’ or ‘become’ in English. Thus ‘Juliet is the sun’ or ‘Beauty is a flower’ are copula metaphors. I used this kind of metaphor because it is useful for revealing the properties of all other types, both to teachers and students. But there are three main problems with treating copula metaphors as central or prototypical:
-
they are rare relative to other kinds of metaphor;
-
they may falsify our conception of metaphor by using an atypical form to identify how metaphor works and what it consists of; and
-
many languages cannot make copula metaphors because they do not have a copula verb, yet metaphor itself is universal.
The first problem is that even in a copula language such as English, copula metaphors are probably not common. Brooke-Rose (1958) and Cameron (1997) in an examination of spoken data, found that, in English, verb metaphors occur more frequently than the noun type.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2004 Randal Holme
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holme, R. (2004). Teaching the Language and Structure of Metaphor. In: Mind, Metaphor and Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503007_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503007_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51254-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50300-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)