Abstract

In May 1912, at the height of the Irish Home Rule crisis, the Ballymoney Free Press expressed in particular circumstances a universal truth of traditional Toryism. ‘The statement of Unionist Ulster’, it announced, ‘is that it merely wants to be let alone.’ Unfortunately, it continued, ‘since Satan entered the Garden of Eden good people will not be let alone’.1 The desire at the heart of traditional Toryism has been this same desire to be let alone in order to enjoy whatever vocation or customary pursuits may be freely chosen. It is explicit in Lord Hugh Cecil’s preference for the known, which is safe, to the unknown, which is likely to be dangerous. ‘Why not let it alone? Why be weary instead of at rest? Why rush into danger instead of staying in safety?’2 It is implied in Lord Hailsham’s celebrated passage where he argued, like most other conservative writers, that meddling in politics is very much a second order activity. For the Tory, life is elsewhere and, in a phrase that now conveys the assumptions of a lost world, the ‘simplest among them prefer fox-hunting — the wisest, religion’. Indeed, for Hailsham the person who would put politics first ‘is not fit to be called a civilised being’.3 There is an innocence, an authenticity, a piety in those non-political preferences and this attribution of value has consequences for conservatism itself.

Keywords

Corn Dust Europe Amid Titan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Cited in P. Bew, Ideology and the Irish Question (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), p.7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Cecil, Conservatism (London: Home University Library, 1912), p.10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lord Hailsham, The Conservative Case (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1959), pp.15–16.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Smith (ed.), Lord Salisbury on Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), p.92.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Fuller, ‘The Poetics of the Civil Life’, in J. Norman (ed.), The Achievement of Michael Oakeshott (London: Duckworth, 1993), pp.67–81.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991), p.415.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991), p.191.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Maude, ‘Scepticism and faith’, The Spectator, 22 March 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cited in A. Roberts, Salisbury: Victorian Titan (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999), p.2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Carsaniga, Giacomo Leopardi: The Unheeded Voice (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1977), p.43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See, for example, P. Worsthorne, In Defence of Aristocracy (London: HarperCollins, 2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Giddens, Beyond Left and Right (London: Polity Press, 1994), pp.80–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.J.P. Taylor, Essays in English History (London: Book Club Associates/Hamish Hamilton, 1977), p.128.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Schopenhauer, Studies in Pessimism: A Series of Essays, trans T. Bailey Saunders (London: Swan Sonnenschein and Company, 1892), p.138.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Kedourie, The Grossman Confessions and Other Essays in Politics, History and Religion (London: Mansell, 1984), p.46.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Daley, ‘Tories must defeat their defeatism’, Daily Telegraph, 6 October 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major (London: Arrow Books, 1998), p.411.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Coleman, Conservatism and the Conservative Party in Nineteenth Century Britain (London: Edward Arnold, 1988), p.206.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See K. Minogue, ‘Introduction: On Conservative Realism’, in K. Minogue (ed.), Conservative Realism: New Essays on Conservatism (London: HarperCollins, 1996).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Fforde, Conservatism and Collectivism 1886–1914 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saccone, E. ‘Nobility and Literature. Questions in Tomasi di Lampedusa’, MLN, 106: (1991), pp.159–78, p.169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 24.
    Lord Coleraine, For Conservative Only (London: Tom Stacey, 1970), p.63.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    C. Moore and S. Heffer (eds), A Tory Seer. The Selected Journalism of T.E. Utley (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1989), pp.73–4, 88.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    B. Jessop, Traditionalism, Conservatism and British Political Culture (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1974), pp.76–7.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    R.W. Johnson, The Politics of Recession (London: Macmillan, 1985), pp.234–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 29.
    J. Bulpitt, ‘The Conservative Party in Britain: A Preliminary Paradoxical Portrait’, paper presented to the PSA annual conference, Lancaster, 1991, p.7.Google Scholar
  27. 30.
    G. Schopflin, Nations, Identity, Power: The New Politics of Europe (London: Hurst, 2000), p.30.Google Scholar
  28. 34.
    T. King, ‘Can Howard rally his party and steer it out of the doldrums?’, Daily Telegraph, 4 October 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 35.
    R. Scruton, England: An Elegy (London: Chatto and Windus, 2000), pp.149–58.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    R. Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986, 2nd edition), p.44.Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    M. Cowling, ‘The Present Position’, in M. Cowling (ed.), Conservative Essays (London: Cassell, 1978), pp.9–10.Google Scholar
  32. 39.
    G. Peele, ‘The Character of Modern British Conservatism’, in Z. Layton-Henry (ed.), Conservative Politics in Western Europe (London: Macmillan, 1982), p.44.Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    M. Pugh, ‘Popular Conservatism in Britain: Continuity and Change, 1880–1987’, Journal of British Studies, 27:2 (1988), pp.254–82, p.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 41.
    M. Steyn, ‘It’s dangerous to get rid of men in tights’, Daily Telegraph, 21 September 2004.Google Scholar
  35. 42.
    A. Bryant, ‘In Defence of Colonel Blimp’, Illustrated London News, 23 June 1951, in M. Bryant (ed.), The Complete Colonel Blimp (London: Bellew Publishing, 1951).Google Scholar
  36. 43.
    S. Letwin, The Anatomy of Thatcherism (London: Fontana, 1992).Google Scholar
  37. 44.
    See S. Collini, ‘The Idea of Character in Victorian Political Thought’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th Series (1985), pp.29–50.Google Scholar
  38. 45.
    W.S. Rodner, ‘Conservatism, Resistance and Lord Hugh Cecil’, History of Political Thought, IX:3 (1988), pp.529–51.Google Scholar
  39. 46.
    R. Harris, ‘Tories at war — still’, Prospect, September 2004.Google Scholar
  40. 47.
    M. Oakeshott, On Human Conduct (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), pp.185–326.Google Scholar
  41. 51.
    O. Letwin, ‘Time the Tories came home’, The Spectator, 19 June 1999, pp.18–19.Google Scholar
  42. 52.
    C. Moore, ‘There’s no point in voting Labour now, but can the Tories cash in?’, Daily Telegraph, 2 October 2004.Google Scholar
  43. 53.
    R. Liddle, ‘The Tories are at rock bottom — and falling’, Sunday Times, 3 October 2004.Google Scholar
  44. 54.
    P. Lynch, The Politics of Nationhood: Sovereignty, Britishness and Conservative Politics (London: Macmillan, 1999), p.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 56.
    J. Biggs-Davison, Tory Lives (London: Putnam and Company, 1952), p.5.Google Scholar
  46. 58.
    S. Heffer, Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell (London: Phoenix, 1999).Google Scholar
  47. 60.
    G. Elton, Return to Essentials: Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp.110–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 61.
    Cited in N. O’Sullivan, European Political Thought since 1945 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004), p.21.Google Scholar
  49. 62.
    See, for example, the attitude of Canetti recorded in P. Conradi, Iris Murdoch: A Life (London: HarperCollins, 2002), p.324.Google Scholar
  50. 64.
    J. Stapleton, ‘Englishness, Britishness and Patriotism in Recent Political Thought and Historiography’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1:1 (1999), pp.119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 66.
    E. Powell, ‘Commentary’, in B. Brivati and H. Jones (eds), What Difference Did the War Make? (London: Leicester University Press, 1995), pp.14–16, p.15.Google Scholar
  52. 69.
    S. Heffer, Nor Shall My Sword (London: Phoenix, 2002), p.15.Google Scholar
  53. 70.
    N. Malcolm, ‘A federal constitution with the heart of a manifesto’, Daily Telegraph, 28 July 2003.Google Scholar
  54. 71.
    N. Johnson, ‘Then and Now: the British Constitution’, Political Studies, 48:1 (2000) pp.118–31, p.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 72.
    R. Scruton, The Need for Nations (London: Civitas, 2004), pp.36–7.Google Scholar
  56. 73.
    A. Sherman, ‘A Coincidental Resemblance: Conservatism and the Conservative Party’, The Salisbury Review, Winter 2000, p.20.Google Scholar
  57. 74.
    J. Bulpitt, ‘Conservative Leaders and the “Euro-ratchet”: Five does of Scepticism’, Political Quarterly, 63:3 (1992), pp.258–75, p.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 76.
    E. Hobsbawm, The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991 (London: Abacus, 1995) andGoogle Scholar
  59. A. Seldon and S. Ball (eds), The Conservative Century: The Conservative Party since 1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Aughey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations