Abstract

The political thought of the Conservative Party has been little analysed, at least in comparison with the Labour Party. Emphasis has instead been placed on the pragmatic nature of the Conservative Party, reinforced by the supposed non-ideological nature of conservatism itself and the utterances of many leading Conservatives that the Party lacks ideology or as it is often expressed is the party of ‘common sense’. A frequent approach of those who do analyse the political thought of the Conservative Party has tended to be descriptive, listing the features most associated with British conservatism.

Keywords

Europe Income Defend Lost Versed 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M. Cowling, ‘The Present Position’, in M. Cowling (ed.), Conservative Essays (London: Cassell, 1978), p.9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.A. Butler, The Art of the Possible (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Q. Hogg, The Case for Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1947), pp.7–30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Gilmour, Inside Right: A Study of Conservatism (London: Quartet, 1978), p.121.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Pym, The Politics of Consent (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1984), p.192.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See M. Oakeshott, ‘Rationalism in Politics’ and ‘On Being Conservative’ both in his Rationalism and Other Essays, ed. T. Fuller (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See K. Minogue, ‘Hyperactivism in Politics’, in Cowling, Conservative Essays, and S. Letwin, The Anatomy of Thatcherism (London: Fontana, 1992).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    This view was expressed in several essays in K. Minogue (ed.), Conservative Realism (London: HarperCollins, 1996).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Bulpitt, ‘The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher’s Domestic Statecraft’, Political Studies, XXXIV (1986), pp.19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    For example, I. Gilmour, Dancing with Dogma (London: Simon and Schuster, 1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    For example, S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds), The Politics of Thatcherism (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    For example, P. Riddell, The Thatcher Government (London: Martin Robertson, 1983).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    See also J. Bulpitt, Territory and Power in the United Kingdom: An Interpretation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    See P. Kerr and D. Marsh, ‘Explaining Thatcherism: Towards a Multidimensional Approach’, in D. Marsh (ed.), Postwar British Politics in Perspective (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    See P. Marsh, The Discipline of Popular Government: Lord Salisbury’s Domestic Statecraft, 1881–1902 (Brighton: Harvester, 1978).Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    N. O’Sullivan, ‘Conservatism, the New Right and the Limited State’, in J. Hayward and P. Norton, The Political Science of British Politics (Brighton: Harvester, 1986).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    B. Evans and A. Taylor, From Salisbury to Major: Continuity and Change in the Conservative Party (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    P. Norton and A. Aughey, Conservatives and Conservatism (London: Temple Smith, 1981), pp.68–83.Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    The distinction between ‘warriors’ and ‘healers’ was made in P. Cosgrave, Margaret Thatcher: A Tory and her Party (London: Hutchinson, 1978).Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    K. Hickson, ‘The Postwar Consensus Revisited’, Political Quarterly, 75:2 (2004), pp.142–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 25.
    Notably, C.A.R. Crosland, The Future of Socialism (London: Cape, 1956).Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    D. Clark, The Conservative Faith in the Modern Age (London: Conservative Political Centre, 1947).Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    A. Gamble, The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988) andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Gamble, ‘An Ideological Party’, in S. Ludlam and M. Smith (eds), Contemporary British Conservatism (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996).Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    My discussion of Enoch Powell has benefited considerably from S. Heffer, Like the Roman (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998).Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    P. Worsthorne, The Socialist Myth (London: Cassell, 1971) and In Defence of Aristocracy (London: HarperCollins, 2004).Google Scholar
  27. 35.
    F.A. von Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 1944).Google Scholar
  28. 36.
    From those who contributed to the volume Conservative Essays edited by Maurice Cowling, Roger Scruton was later to criticise the Thatcher Governments on these grounds. See in particular, R. Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1984). Others who contributed to that volume were also critical, notably John Biffen and Peregrine Worsthorne, on different grounds, while others remained more sympathetic including Cowling himself, Shirley Robin Letwin and Kenneth Minogue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 38.
    K. Joseph and J. Sumption, Equality (London: Murray, 1979). SeeGoogle Scholar
  30. A. Denham and M. Garnett, Keith Joseph (Chesham: Acumen, 2002) for a discussion of the writing and publication of Equality.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Hickson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations