Abstract
The office of the British prime minister is not to any similar extent an autonomous position, as is the office of the American president. Whereas the supremacy of the prime minister over other actors in the British core executive has increased significantly, both politically and constitutionally, over recent decades, British politics, even in the core executive territory, remains very much a team game. Thus, it seems only natural that many of the constitutional and political qualifications for the office of prime minister have to be acquired within the other institutions of British politics, such as parliament, the cabinet and the political parties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
According to a somewhat more provocative interpretation, Macmillan’s aim was to promote effective television performers. One of the new ministers, William Deedes, was given the title of Minister without Portfolio but, as Cockerell (1988: 82) has argued, ‘was in reality the Minister of Propaganda, charged with improving the image of the Prime Minister and his government’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Ludger Helms
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helms, L. (2005). Britain: Prime Ministers, Cabinets and the Struggle for Supremacy. In: Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502918_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502918_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-4251-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50291-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)