Skip to main content

Stockholding: Recent Lessons from Theory and Computations

  • Chapter
Stockholding in Europe

Abstract

This chapter presents recent developments in the theory of optimal portfolio design in a non-technical manner, provides the intuition behind these results, and uses them to interpret important findings in the empirical literature based on high-quality, household-level portfolio data. Where theoretical predictions are confirmed by empirical observation, theory provides a way to interpret empirical findings. Where the two disagree, the mechanisms stressed by theory serve as a first step towards identifying the full set of factors at work and the extent to which household behaviour can be modified to fit objectives better.

I am grateful to Luigi Guiso for insightful comments on a previous draft, and to Carol Bertaut, Christis Hassapis, Tullio Jappelli, and Alexander Michaelides for discussions, over the recent years, that contributed to shaping the ideas presented here. I would like to give special thanks to the Observatoire de l’Epargne Européenne, Paris, France for financial support of this research project. I have benefited from interactions with OEE project participants in preparing this chapter. I also thank the HERMES Center on Computational Finance and Economics and the Leventis Foundation for supporting some of the original research reported in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1974) Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, P. J., B. D. Bernheim and K. J. Scholz (1996) ‘The effects of financial education in the workplace: evidence from a survey of employers’, NBER Working Paper 5655.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaut, C. C. (1998) ‘Stockholding behaviour of US households: evidence from the 1983–1989 survey of consumer finances’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. E., J. Crockett and I. Friend (1974) ‘Stock ownership in the US: characteristics and trends’, Survey of Current Business, 54: 16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira (2002) Strategic Asset Allocation – Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. D. (1997) ‘Buffer stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII, 3–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocco, J., F. Gomes and P. Maenhout (1999) ‘Consumption and portfolio choice over the life-cycle’, Mimeo, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. H. (1997) ‘Where is the market going? Uncertain facts and novel theories’, NBER Working Paper No. 6207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. and P. Willen (2000) ‘Occupation-level income shocks and asset returns: their covariance and implications for portfolio choice’, CRSP Working Paper No. 523.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1991) ‘Saving and liquidity constraints’, Econometrica, 59: 1221–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donkers, B. (2000) ‘Loss aversion, probability weighting and the stock holding puzzle’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. and S. E. Zin (1990) ‘First-order risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 26: 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, K. and J. Poterba (1991) ‘Investor diversification and international equity markets’, American Economic Review, 81: 222–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2001a) The Economics of Risk and Time, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2001b) ‘What does theory have to say about household portfolios?’, in Guiso, Haliassos and Jappelli (eds) Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2001c) ‘Equilibrium portfolios with consumption externalities’, mimeo, University of Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., M. Haliassos and T. Jappelli (2001) Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haliassos, M. and C. C. Bertaut (1995) ‘Why do so few hold stocks?’, The Economic Journal, 105: 1110–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haliassos, M. and C. Hassapis (2001) ‘Non-expected utility, saving, and portfolios’, The Economic Journal, 111: 69–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haliassos, M. and A. Michaelides (1999) ‘Portfolio choice and liquidity constraints’, forthcoming in International Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haliassos, M. and A. Michaelides (2001) ‘Calibration and computation of household portfolio models’, in Guiso, Haliassos and Jappelli (eds) Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. and D. Lucas (1997) ‘Market frictions, savings behaviour, and portfolio choice’, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1: 76–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. and D. Lucas (2000a) ‘Portfolio choice in the presence of background risk’, The Economic Journal, 110: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. and D. Lucas (2000b) ‘Asset pricing and portfolio choice: the importance of entrepreneurial risk.’ Journal of Finance, 55: 1163–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. (1999) ‘Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 571–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelides, A. (2000) ‘International portfolio choice and liquidity constraints: can small information costs explain the home-equity bias puzzle?’, mimeo, University of Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiella, M. (2000) ‘Transaction costs and limited stock market participation to reconcile asset prices and consumption choices’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkovnichenko, V. (2000) ‘Heterogeneous labour income and preferences: implications for stock market participation’, mimeo, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. (2001) ‘Taxation and portfolio structure: issues and implications’, in Guiso, Haliassos and Jappelli (eds) Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982) ‘A theory of anticipated utility’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3: 323–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2002) ‘Towards an explanation of household portfolio choice heterogeneity: non-financial income and participation cost structures’, NBER Working Paper No. 8884.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. (1987) ‘The dual theory of choice under risk’, Econometrica, 55: 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Luigi Guiso Michael Haliassos Tullio Jappelli

Copyright information

© 2003 the contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haliassos, M. (2003). Stockholding: Recent Lessons from Theory and Computations. In: Guiso, L., Haliassos, M., Jappelli, T. (eds) Stockholding in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502673_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics