Skip to main content
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

There is a palpable sense amongst Europeans that major questions on the future of international politics no longer involve them. European opinions and preferences do not seem to matter, as the United States appears determined to define its interests nationally, assertively, and unilaterally. Long- established practices of consultation are pushed aside, replaced with calls for cooperation that do not appear to be issued with any serious desire that they will be heeded or acted upon. There is no doubt that an assertive, unilateral America challenges the basis of the relationship with its closest allies. Transatlantic relations are as much about shared vision as they are about joint policies. In the absence of one, the other inevitably atrophies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Chace, ‘The Complex Metamorphosis of American Foreign Policy’, The New York Times (16 December 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Trachtenberg, ‘A “Wasting Asset”’, International Security 13 (Winter 1988/89) 5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. I. H. Daalder and J. M. Lindsay, America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. P. Leffler, ‘9/11 and the past and future of American Foreign Policy,’ International Affairs 79, 5 (2003) 1045–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Krauthammer, ‘The Unipolar Moment Revisited,’ The National Interest 70 (Winter 2002/03) 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. J. Ikenberry, ed. America Unrivaled — The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2002), p.3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. G. Brooks and W. C. Wohlforth, ‘American Primacy in Perspective,’ Foreign Affairs 81, 4 (July/August 2002) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Jervis, ‘Understanding the Bush Doctrine,’ Political Science Quarterly 118, 3 (Fall 2003) 383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Nye, The Paradox of American Power, Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t go it Alone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), p.xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Hoffmann, ‘US-European relations: past and future,’ International Affairs 79, 5 (2003) 1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Gnesotto, ‘EU, US: visions of the world, visions of the other,’ in G. Lindstrom, ed., Shift or Rift — Assessing US-EU relations after Iraq (Paris: WEU-ISS, 2003), p.41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Howorth, European Integration and Defence: The Ultimate Challenge? (Paris: WEU-ISS, 2000), Chaillot Paper 43

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Howorth and J. T. S. Keeler, eds, Defending Europe: The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy (New York: Palgrave, 2003), pp.3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Ojanen, Theories at a loss? EU-NATO fusion and the ‘low-politicisation’ of security and defense in European integration (Helsinki: Finnish Institutue of International Affairs, 2003) http.upi-fiia.fi/julkaisut/UPI_WP/wp/wp35.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Hubel and B. May, Ein ‘normales’ Deutschland? Die Souveraene Bundesrepublik in der auslaendischen Wahrnehmung (Bonn: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Auswaertige Politik e.V., 1995), pp.107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Bertram and F. Heisbourg, ‘Europe’s role: A new trans-Atlantic relationship’, IHT, 18 March 2003, http://www.iht.com/articles/90058.html

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Weidenfeld, Europa’s Alternativen, Aufgaben und Perspektiven der grossen Europaeischen Union, Vorlage zum Internationalen Bertelsmann Forum (Berlin: January 2004), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. T. R. Fox, The Super-Powers, The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union — Their Responsibility for Peace (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1944), p.3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karp, R. (2005). Transatlantic Relations after 9/11 and Iraq: Continuities and Discontinuities. In: Gärtner, H., Cuthbertson, I.M. (eds) European Security and Transatlantic Relations after 9/11 and the Iraq War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502536_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics