Abstract
The pun on ‘relations’ (relations as family, relations as stories) is ours rather than theirs, but it does illuminate important features of the narratives written by Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin and their daughter Mary.1 We have already seen that this is true of Godwin’s Things as They Are; or, Caleb Williams (1794). It is equally though differently true of Wollstonecraft’s The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria (1797) and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modem Prometheus (1818). Maria and Frankenstein, like Caleb Williams, foreground storytelling — mainly autobiographical storytelling — as a central feature of human relationships and one which has, or aspires to have, illocutionary force. These are novels about ‘how to do things with stories’. They are also novels which, like Caleb Williams, explore family relationships, though their understanding of ‘family’ is closer to our own than to Godwin’s, referring to those who are linked, like these three writers themselves, by marriage or by close ties of kinship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Peter Brooks, Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1993, p. 200.
Gary Kelly, English Fiction of the Romantic Period, London: Longman, 1989, p. 41.
William Godwin, Preface, Memoirs of the Author of ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’, London: Johnson, 1798
Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, ‘A Short residence in Sweden’ and ‘Memoirs of the Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987, p. 204.
Mary Wollstonecraft, ‘Mary’ and ‘The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria’, ed. Gary Kelly, Oxford: Worlds Classics, 1976, p. 176.
Claudia Johnson, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s novels’, in The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 207.
Barbara Taylor, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 244.
Beth Newman, ‘Narratives of Seduction and the Seductions of Narrative: The Frame Structure of Frankenstein’, English Literary History, 1986, pp. 141–64.
Chris Baldick, In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and ’Nineteenth-Century Writing, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, p. 10.
Gavin Edwards, ‘Repeating the Same Dull Round’, in Unnam’d Forms: Blake and Textuality, eds Nelson Hilton and Thomas Vogler, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, pp. 26–48.
Copyright information
© 2006 Gavin Edwards
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwards, G. (2006). Relations: Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley. In: Narrative Order, 1789–1819. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502246_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502246_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54330-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-50224-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)