Advertisement

Talking in the Here and Now: Reference and Politeness in Alzheimer Conversation

  • Boyd H. Davis
  • Cynthia Bernstein

Abstract

We first met “Larry Wilcox” in December, 1999, and learned something of him throughout 2000 and 2001, the two years during which we conversed with him, and on which we base this case study of reference and politeness in Alzheimer conversation. Some of our conversations were short and some were shorter — Wilcox was not loquacious. Indeed, staff in the Alzheimer’s unit at Pleasant Meadows, a private retirement and assisted living facility in Charlotte, NC, had initially wondered whether he could be sufficiently talkative with strangers to be a conversation partner. We were told that he was in his early 80s, diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s Disease, no longer formally assessed, but in the process of moving from moderately severe to severe cognitive decline. We attempted to get a baseline for cognition by administering the Seven-Minute Screen (Solomon et al. 1998), but he stopped the test two-thirds of the way through, and refused for the rest of our acquaintance to participate in any interaction where the conversation partner carried notebooks or picture cards or asked content-seeking questions.

Keywords

Relational Goal Assisted Living Facility Conversation Partner Global Deterioration Scale Demonstrative Pronoun 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almor, A. (1999) “Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: the Informational Load Hypothesis”. Psychological Review 106: 748–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almor, A., Kempler, D., MacDonald, M., Andersen, E., & Tyler, L. (1999) “Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer’s disease.” Brain and Language, 67: 202–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999) The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Bou-Franch, P. & Garces-Conejos, P. (2003) “Teaching linguistic politeness: A methodological proposal.” IRAL 41: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourgeois, M.S., Dijkstra, K., Burgio, L., & Allen-Burge, R. (2001) “Memory aids as an AAC strategy for nursing home residents with dementia”. Journal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication 17, 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chafe, W. (1982) “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature”. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 35–53.Google Scholar
  8. Cherney, L., Shadden, B., & Coelho, C., eds. (1998) Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen.Google Scholar
  9. Coelho, C.A. (1998) “Analysis of Conversation”. In Cherney, L., Shadden, B., & Coelho, C. (eds.) Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen.Google Scholar
  10. Coelho, C., Youse, K., Le, K., & Feinn, R. (2003) “Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: a discriminant analysis.” Aphasiology 17, 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, G. & Coelho, C. (2004) “Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury”. Brain and Language 89: 508–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, C. (2003) “How English-learners joke with native speakers: an interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, B., Moore, L., & Peacock, J. (2000) “Frozen phrases as requests for topic management: effect and affect in recipient design by a speaker of Alzheimer’s discourse.” Presented at NWAV2000, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  14. Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M., Allen, R., & Burgio, L. (2004) “Conversational coherence: discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 17: 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dijkstra, K., Bourgeois, M., Petrie, G., Burgio, L., & Allen-Burge, R. (2002) “My recaller is on vacation: discourse analysis of nursing-home residents with dementia” Discourse Processes 33: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duong, A., Tardif, A., & Ska. B. (2003) “Discourse about discourse: What is it and how does it progress in Alzheimer’s disease?” Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, C. & Thompson, S. (1990) “A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation.” Language 66: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser, B. (1990) “Perspectives on politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. (1981) “Footing.” In Goffman, E. (ed.), Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 124–57.Google Scholar
  21. Goodwin, C. (1995) “Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man.” Research on Language in Social Interaction 28: 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodwin, C. (ed.) (2003) Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grainger, K. (2002) “Politeness or impoliteness? verbal play on the hospital ward. Sheffield-Hallam Working Papers: Linguistic Politeness and Context. Online at http://www.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/.Google Scholar
  24. Guendouzi, J. & Mueller, N. (2001) “Intelligibility and rehearsed sequences in conversations with a DAT patient.” Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 15: 910–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gumperz, J., 1982a Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gumperz, J., 1982b Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Halliday, M. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  28. Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton, H. (1994a) Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton, H. (1994b) “Requests for clarification as evidence of pragmatic comprehension difficulty: the case of Alzheimer’s Disease”. In Bloom, R., Obler, L., De Santi, S., & Erlich, J., eds., Discourse Analysis and Applications: Studies in Adult Clinical Populations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 185–99.Google Scholar
  31. Hengst, J. (2003) “Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46: 831–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hier, D., Hagenlocker, D., & Schindler, A. (1985) “Language disintegration in dementia: effects of etiology and severity.” Brain and Language 25, 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hymes, D. (1972) “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life”. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 35–71.Google Scholar
  34. Kempler, D. (1991) “Language Changes in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type”. In Lubinski, R., Orange, J., Henderson, D., & Stecker, N. (eds.), Dementia and Communication. Philadelphia, Hamilton: B.C. Decker, 98–114.Google Scholar
  35. Kintsch, W. & Van Dijk, T. (1978) “Toward a model of text comprehension and production.” Psychological Review 85, 363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitwood T. & Bredin K. (1992) “Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being”. Ageing and Society 12, 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liles, B. & Coelho, C. (1998) “Cohesion Analysis”. In Cherney, L., Shadden, B., & Coelho, C. (eds.), Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen, 65–84.Google Scholar
  38. Merrison, A. (2002) “Politeness in task-oriented dialogue”. Sheffield-Hallam Working Papers: Linguistic Politeness and Context, http://www.shu.ac.uk/wpw/politeness/.Google Scholar
  39. Nicholas, M., Obler, L., Albert, M., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1985) “Empty speech in Alzheimer’s disease and fluent aphasia”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28: 405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Overstreet, M. (1999) Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Overstreet, M. & Yule, G. (2000) “Formulaic disclaimers.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 45–60.Google Scholar
  42. Perkins, L., Whitworth, A., & Lesser, R. (1998) “Conversing in dementia: a conversation analytic approach.” Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ramanathan-Abbott, V. (1994) “Interactive differences in Alzheimer’s discourse: an examination of AD speech across two audiences.” Language in Society 23: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramanathan, V. (1995) “Narrative well-formedness in Alzheimer’s disease: an interactional analysis across settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramanathan, V. (1997) Alzheimer Discourse: Some Sociolinguistic Dimensions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Reisberg, B., Ferris, S., Leon, J., & Crook, T. (1982) “The global deterioration scale for the assessment of primary degenerative dementia”. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139: 1136–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reisberg, B. (1988) “Functional Assessment Staging (FAST).” Psychopharmacology Bulletin 24: 653–9.Google Scholar
  48. Rhys, C. & Schmidt-Renfree, N. (2000) “Facework, social politeness and the Alzheimer’s patient.” Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 14: 533–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ripich D., Carpenter, E., & Ziol, E. (2000) “Conversational cohesion patterns in men and women with Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study.” International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 35: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ripich, D., Fritsch, T., Ziol, E. & Durand, E. (2000) “Compensatory strategies in picture description across severity levels in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 217–27.Google Scholar
  51. Ripich, D. & Terrell, B. (1988) “Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer’s disease.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 53: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabat, S. (2001) The Experience of Alzheimer’s Disease: Life through a Tangled Veil Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Sabat, S. (2002) “Surviving manifestations of selfhood in Alzheimer’s disease: a case study.” Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice 1: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sabat, S. & Cagigas, X. (1997) “Extralinguistic communication compensates for the loss of verbal fluency: a case study of Alzheimer’s disease.” Language and Communication 17: 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sabat, S. & Harré, R. (1992) “The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer’s disease.” Ageing and Society 12, 443–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sabat, S. & Harré, R. (1994) “The Alzheimer’s disease sufferer as a semiotic subject.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1: 145–60.Google Scholar
  57. Schiffrin, Deborah. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Scollon R. & Scollon, S. (2002) Intercultural Communication. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Shadden, B. (1998) “Sentential/Surface-Level Analyses.” In Cherney, L., Shadden, B., & Coelho, C. (eds.) Analyzing Discourse in Communicatively Impaired Adults. Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen.Google Scholar
  60. Shakespeare, P. (1998) Aspects of Confused Speech: A Study of Verbal Interaction between Confused and Normal Speakers. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  61. Solomon P., Hirschoff, A., Kelly B., Relin, M., Brush, M., DeVeaux, R., & Pendlebury W. (1998) “A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer’s disease”. Archiv Neurologia 55: 349–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strauss, S. (2002) “This, that, and it in spoken American English: a demonstrative system of gradient focus”. Language Sciences 24: 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tannen, D. (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tannen, C. (1999) “New York Jewish conversational style.” Excerpted and reprinted from (1981) International Journal of Sociology of Language 30: 133–49, with pagination to A. Jawaorski and N. Coupland, eds. The Discourse Reader. London and NY: Routledge, 459–73.Google Scholar
  65. Temple, V., Sabat, S., & Koger, R. (1999) “Intact use of politeness strategies in the discourse of Alzheimer’s disease sufferers.” Language and Communication 19: 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulatowska, H. & Chapman, S. (1991) “Discourse Studies”. In Lubinski, R., Orange, J., Henderson, D., & Stecker, N. (eds.) Dementia and Communication. Philadelphia, Hamilton: B.C. Decker, 115–32.Google Scholar
  67. Wray, A. & Perkins, M. (2000) “The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model”. Language & Communication 20 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wray, A. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Boyd H. Davis and Cynthia Bernstein 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boyd H. Davis
  • Cynthia Bernstein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations