Skip to main content

Speak to Me, Listen to Me: Ethnic and Gender Variations in Talk and Potential Consequences in Interactions for People with Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Chapter

Abstract

Talk is a non-material communication tool that people use to meet their goals in social interaction. This view, held by linguistic anthropology (Duranti 1997), states that talk is a tool speakers use in various ways in differing circumstances. The successful use of talk as a tool in conversation depends on ways of speaking or practices related to one’s cultural assumptions and social positions. These are learned over a lifetime and integrated by speakers as social identities (Ellis 1999). Although social practices affect communication, the role of social variations in talk with people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has received relatively less attention than cognitive or expressive language issues in AD. Social identities are often strongly tied to expressive speaking behaviors (Reichman 1997), particularly those related to gender (Roter, Lipkin, & Korsgaard 1991) and ethnicity (Stubbe 1998). Hanks (1996) has proposed a co-constructed model of communication based on the simultaneous roles of speakers/listeners in conversations. Within this concept of co-construction, people, as speakers and listeners, alter their communication relative to gender and ethnicity in the midst of a conversation quickly and often without conscious awareness (Jacoby & Ochs 1995). While engaged in more functional tasks, speech partners may or may not recognize references. They may index inferences into a phrase, pause, raise in pitch or other element of performance (Hanks 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998) Claiming Power in Doctor-Patient Talk. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambady N., et al (2002) “Physical therapists’ nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients’ health outcomes.” Psychology and Aging 17: 443–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C. & S. Widdicombe, eds. (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey B. (2000) “Communicative behavior and conflict between African American and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles.” Discourse & Society 11: 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethea, L. & A. Balazas (1997) “Improving generational health care communication.” Journal of Health Communication 2: 129–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1972/1995) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1998) Songs of Zion: The African Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States and South Africa. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (1995) The Influence of Race and Racial Identity on Psychotherapy. Toward a Racially Inclusive Model. NY: John Wiley & Sons-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. (1997) “The Construction of a Collaborative Floor in Women’s Friendly Talk.” In Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative, and Social Perspectives, ed. T. Givon. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.: 55–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. & D. Roter (2003) “Patient-Provider Communication: The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on the Process and Outcomes of Healthcare.” In Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare, eds. B. Smedley, A. Stith, & A. Nelson. Washington, DC: National Academies Press: 552–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, N., et al. (1991) Language, Society,& the Elderly. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. (1998) “Being Ascribed, and Resisting, Membership of an Ethnic Group.” In Identities in Talk. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage: 151–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derber, C. (2000) The Pursuit of Attention: Power and Ego in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W.E.B. (1953/1961) The Souls of Black Folk. Greenwich, CN: Fawcett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. (1999) Crafting Society. Ethnicity, Class, and Communication Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, V.O. (1999) “On the Relationship between Memory and Language in the Dementia Spectrum of Depression, Alzheimer Syndrome, and Normal Aging.” In Language and Communication in Old Age: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. H. Hamilton. NY: Garland.: 25–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. (2001) “Variety, Style-Shifting, and Ideology.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. J. Rickford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. & A. Kuntay (1997) “The Occasioning and Structure of Conversational Stories.” In Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative, and Social Perspectives, ed. T. Givon. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 133–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foddy, M. & Y. Kashima (2002) Self and Identity: Personal, Social, and Symbolic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977/1991) Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, R. (1993) The Social Construction of Whiteness: White Women, Race Matters. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. & J. Dovidio (2000) Reducing Ingroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. (1990) “Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 883–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, C. & H. Giles (2003) “New Directions in Intercultural Communication Competence: The Process Model.” In Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, ed. J. Greene & B. Burleson. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. (1996) Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M., et al. eds. (1993) African American Communication: Ethnic Identity and Cultural Interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, T. (2002) Language as Social Action. Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, R. & C. LeBaron (1998) “How gender creeps into talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Housely, W. & R. Fitzgerald (2002a) “The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis.” Qualitative Research 2: 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D., et al. (2002) “Distribution of African Americans in residential care/assisted living and nursing homes: More evidence of racial disparity?” American Journal of Public Health 9: 1272–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura, H. (2001) “Describing conversational dominance.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1859–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. & E. Ochs (1995). “Co-construction: An introduction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, L., et al. (2001) “Attitudes toward Black English and code switching.” Journal of Black Psychology 27: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1998) “Co-existent Systems in African American Vernacular English.” In African-American English: Structure, History, Use, eds. S. Mufwene, J. Rickford, G. Bailey, & J. Baugh. London: Routledge: 110–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (2001) “The Anatomy of Style-Shifting.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. P. Eckert & J. Rickford, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction, and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, H. (1993) Black Baltimore: A New Theory of Community. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., et al. (1990) “Narrative practices and the social construction of self in childhood.” American Ethnologist 17: 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1996) “Conversational Signifying: Grammar and Indirectness among African American Women.” In Interaction and Grammar, eds. Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 405–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1992) “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. A. Duranti & C. Goodwin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 335–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M. & H. Winant (1996) Racial Formation in the United States. From the 1960s to the 1990s. NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (1998) “Handling ‘Incoherence’ According to the Speaker’s On-Sight Categorization.” In Identities in Talk, eds. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage, 171–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papousek, M. (1995) “Origins of Reciprocity and Mutuality in Prelinguistic Parent and Infant ‘Dialogues’.” In Mutualities in Dialogue, ed. K. Foppa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 58–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, J. (1997) “Language-specific response patterns and subjective assessment of health: A sociolinguistic analysis.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 19: 353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. (1999) African American Vernacular English. Features, Evolution, Educational Implications. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickford, J. & R. Rickford (2000) Spoken Soul. The Story of Black English. NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripich, D., et al. (2000) “Conversational cohesion patterns in men and women with Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study.” International Journal of Language and Communicative Disorders 35: 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (2002) Communication and Health in Multi-Ethnic Society. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D., et al. (1991) “Sex differences in patients’ and physicians’ primary care medical visits.” Medical Care 29: 1083–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1999) “Gossip in an Older Women’s Support Group: A Linguistic Analysis.” In Language and Communication in Old Age: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. H. Hamilton, ed. NY: Garland: 267–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1991) “Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, eds. D. Boden & D. Zimmerman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 44–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipler, D. (1997) A Country of Strangers: Blacks and Whites in America. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smitherman, G. (1977) Talkin and Testifyin. The Language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, R.J. (2003) “Interpersonal Communication Skills in Health Care Contexts.” In Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, eds. J. Greene & B. Burleson. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 909–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, M. (1998) “Are you listening? Cultural influences on the use of supportive verbal feedback in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 29: 257–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1989/1996) Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D., ed. (1993) Gender and Conversation Interaction. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1993) “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. D. Tannen. NY: Oxford University Press: 165–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, B. & D. Ripich (1989) “Discourse competence as a variable in intervention.” Seminars in Speech and Language 10: 282–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thimm, C., et al. (1995) “Power-related talk: Control in verbal interaction.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14: 382–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink-Muisnen, A., et al. (2002) “Do gender-dyads have different communication patterns? A comparative study in Western-European general practices.” Patient Education and Counseling 48: 253–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. & J. Nussbaum (2001) Intergenerational Communication across the Life Span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W., et al. (1999) Dialects in Schools and Communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. (1998) “Identity, Context, and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, eds. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage: 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Ms. Naomi Sampson and Ms. Tiffani Myers in the preparation of this chapter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Charlene Pope and Danielle N. Ripich

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pope, C., Ripich, D.N. (2005). Speak to Me, Listen to Me: Ethnic and Gender Variations in Talk and Potential Consequences in Interactions for People with Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Davis, B.H. (eds) Alzheimer Talk, Text and Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502024_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics