Advertisement

Speak to Me, Listen to Me: Ethnic and Gender Variations in Talk and Potential Consequences in Interactions for People with Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Charlene Pope
  • Danielle N. Ripich

Abstract

Talk is a non-material communication tool that people use to meet their goals in social interaction. This view, held by linguistic anthropology (Duranti 1997), states that talk is a tool speakers use in various ways in differing circumstances. The successful use of talk as a tool in conversation depends on ways of speaking or practices related to one’s cultural assumptions and social positions. These are learned over a lifetime and integrated by speakers as social identities (Ellis 1999). Although social practices affect communication, the role of social variations in talk with people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has received relatively less attention than cognitive or expressive language issues in AD. Social identities are often strongly tied to expressive speaking behaviors (Reichman 1997), particularly those related to gender (Roter, Lipkin, & Korsgaard 1991) and ethnicity (Stubbe 1998). Hanks (1996) has proposed a co-constructed model of communication based on the simultaneous roles of speakers/listeners in conversations. Within this concept of co-construction, people, as speakers and listeners, alter their communication relative to gender and ethnicity in the midst of a conversation quickly and often without conscious awareness (Jacoby & Ochs 1995). While engaged in more functional tasks, speech partners may or may not recognize references. They may index inferences into a phrase, pause, raise in pitch or other element of performance (Hanks 1996).

Keywords

Social Identity Gender Variation Female Interviewer Male Interviewer Gender Pair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998) Claiming Power in Doctor-Patient Talk. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady N., et al (2002) “Physical therapists’ nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients’ health outcomes.” Psychology and Aging 17: 443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antaki, C. & S. Widdicombe, eds. (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey B. (2000) “Communicative behavior and conflict between African American and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles.” Discourse & Society 11: 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethea, L. & A. Balazas (1997) “Improving generational health care communication.” Journal of Health Communication 2: 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1972/1995) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, J. (1998) Songs of Zion: The African Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States and South Africa. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, R. (1995) The Influence of Race and Racial Identity on Psychotherapy. Toward a Racially Inclusive Model. NY: John Wiley & Sons-Interscience.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, J. (1997) “The Construction of a Collaborative Floor in Women’s Friendly Talk.” In Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative, and Social Perspectives, ed. T. Givon. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.: 55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, L. & D. Roter (2003) “Patient-Provider Communication: The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on the Process and Outcomes of Healthcare.” In Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare, eds. B. Smedley, A. Stith, & A. Nelson. Washington, DC: National Academies Press: 552–625.Google Scholar
  11. Coupland, N., et al. (1991) Language, Society,& the Elderly. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Day, D. (1998) “Being Ascribed, and Resisting, Membership of an Ethnic Group.” In Identities in Talk. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage: 151–70.Google Scholar
  13. Derber, C. (2000) The Pursuit of Attention: Power and Ego in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. DuBois, W.E.B. (1953/1961) The Souls of Black Folk. Greenwich, CN: Fawcett.Google Scholar
  15. Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, D. (1999) Crafting Society. Ethnicity, Class, and Communication Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Emery, V.O. (1999) “On the Relationship between Memory and Language in the Dementia Spectrum of Depression, Alzheimer Syndrome, and Normal Aging.” In Language and Communication in Old Age: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, ed. H. Hamilton. NY: Garland.: 25–62.Google Scholar
  18. Ervin-Tripp, S. (2001) “Variety, Style-Shifting, and Ideology.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. J. Rickford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 44–56.Google Scholar
  19. Ervin-Tripp, S. & A. Kuntay (1997) “The Occasioning and Structure of Conversational Stories.” In Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative, and Social Perspectives, ed. T. Givon. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 133–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foddy, M. & Y. Kashima (2002) Self and Identity: Personal, Social, and Symbolic. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1977/1991) Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  22. Frankenberg, R. (1993) The Social Construction of Whiteness: White Women, Race Matters. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gaertner, S. & J. Dovidio (2000) Reducing Ingroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldberg, J. (1990) “Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 883–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hajek, C. & H. Giles (2003) “New Directions in Intercultural Communication Competence: The Process Model.” In Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, ed. J. Greene & B. Burleson. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Hanks, W. (1996) Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hecht, M., et al. eds. (1993) African American Communication: Ethnic Identity and Cultural Interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Holtgraves, T. (2002) Language as Social Action. Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Hopper, R. & C. LeBaron (1998) “How gender creeps into talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Housely, W. & R. Fitzgerald (2002a) “The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis.” Qualitative Research 2: 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard, D., et al. (2002) “Distribution of African Americans in residential care/assisted living and nursing homes: More evidence of racial disparity?” American Journal of Public Health 9: 1272–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Itakura, H. (2001) “Describing conversational dominance.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1859–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacoby, S. & E. Ochs (1995). “Co-construction: An introduction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koch, L., et al. (2001) “Attitudes toward Black English and code switching.” Journal of Black Psychology 27: 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Labov, W. (1998) “Co-existent Systems in African American Vernacular English.” In African-American English: Structure, History, Use, eds. S. Mufwene, J. Rickford, G. Bailey, & J. Baugh. London: Routledge: 110–53.Google Scholar
  36. Labov, W. (2001) “The Anatomy of Style-Shifting.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. P. Eckert & J. Rickford, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 65–108.Google Scholar
  37. Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction, and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDougall, H. (1993) Black Baltimore: A New Theory of Community. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, P., et al. (1990) “Narrative practices and the social construction of self in childhood.” American Ethnologist 17: 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morgan, M. (1996) “Conversational Signifying: Grammar and Indirectness among African American Women.” In Interaction and Grammar, eds. Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 405–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochs, E. (1992) “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. A. Duranti & C. Goodwin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 335–58.Google Scholar
  42. Omi, M. & H. Winant (1996) Racial Formation in the United States. From the 1960s to the 1990s. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Paoletti, I. (1998) “Handling ‘Incoherence’ According to the Speaker’s On-Sight Categorization.” In Identities in Talk, eds. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage, 171–90.Google Scholar
  44. Papousek, M. (1995) “Origins of Reciprocity and Mutuality in Prelinguistic Parent and Infant ‘Dialogues’.” In Mutualities in Dialogue, ed. K. Foppa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 58–81.Google Scholar
  45. Reichman, J. (1997) “Language-specific response patterns and subjective assessment of health: A sociolinguistic analysis.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 19: 353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rickford, J. (1999) African American Vernacular English. Features, Evolution, Educational Implications. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Rickford, J. & R. Rickford (2000) Spoken Soul. The Story of Black English. NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Ripich, D., et al. (2000) “Conversational cohesion patterns in men and women with Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study.” International Journal of Language and Communicative Disorders 35: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson, M. (2002) Communication and Health in Multi-Ethnic Society. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  50. Roter, D., et al. (1991) “Sex differences in patients’ and physicians’ primary care medical visits.” Medical Care 29: 1083–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saunders, P. (1999) “Gossip in an Older Women’s Support Group: A Linguistic Analysis.” In Language and Communication in Old Age: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. H. Hamilton, ed. NY: Garland: 267–93.Google Scholar
  52. Schegloff, E. (1991) “Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, eds. D. Boden & D. Zimmerman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 44–70.Google Scholar
  53. Shipler, D. (1997) A Country of Strangers: Blacks and Whites in America. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  54. Smitherman, G. (1977) Talkin and Testifyin. The Language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Street, R.J. (2003) “Interpersonal Communication Skills in Health Care Contexts.” In Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, eds. J. Greene & B. Burleson. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 909–33.Google Scholar
  56. Stubbe, M. (1998) “Are you listening? Cultural influences on the use of supportive verbal feedback in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 29: 257–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tannen, D. (1989/1996) Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tannen, D., ed. (1993) Gender and Conversation Interaction. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tannen, D. (1993) “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. D. Tannen. NY: Oxford University Press: 165–88.Google Scholar
  60. Terrell, B. & D. Ripich (1989) “Discourse competence as a variable in intervention.” Seminars in Speech and Language 10: 282–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thimm, C., et al. (1995) “Power-related talk: Control in verbal interaction.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14: 382–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van den Brink-Muisnen, A., et al. (2002) “Do gender-dyads have different communication patterns? A comparative study in Western-European general practices.” Patient Education and Counseling 48: 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, A. & J. Nussbaum (2001) Intergenerational Communication across the Life Span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Wolfram, W., et al. (1999) Dialects in Schools and Communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Zimmerman, D. (1998) “Identity, Context, and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, eds. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe. London: Sage: 87–106.Google Scholar
  67. The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Ms. Naomi Sampson and Ms. Tiffani Myers in the preparation of this chapter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charlene Pope and Danielle N. Ripich 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlene Pope
  • Danielle N. Ripich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations