Epilogue: The Prism, the Soliloquy, the Couch, and the Dance — The Evolving Study of Language and Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Heidi E. Hamilton

Abstract

I’m writing this epilogue to Alzheimer Talk, Text and Context twenty-three years after I began what would become a 4½ year conversational journey with “Elsie,” an eighty-one-year-old woman diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. At the beginning of my conversations with Elsie, I was a twenty-six-year-old graduate student in sociolinguistics, and no stranger to working with elderly individuals. During my years in high school and college I had frequently visited area nursing homes and enjoyed conversing with residents despite the sometimes severe sense-making difficulties that accompanied these talks. My volunteer work at the health care center where Elsie lived involved co-leading weekly armchair exercise and baking classes, assisting with afternoon parties, reading to blind residents, and speaking with a woman who had lost her English abilities and could only speak her first language, German. In my role as participant-observer, I was hoping to supplement the clinical approach taken in most studies of Alzheimer’s disease at that time with what Kitwood (1988) has called a “personal research approach”:

The key to a personal approach is that it does not “stand outside,” taking the position of a detached and unaffected observer. At its core, it works interpretively and empathetically, going far beyond the measurement of indices or the codification of behaviour. In all of this the researcher takes a personal risk… It is on the ground of our own experience that we can gain some inkling of what is happening to another. (Kitwood 1988:176)

Keywords

Europe Dementia Coherence Beach Cane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, M. (1997) “Positioning between structure and performance”. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7: 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayles, K. (1979) “Communication Profiles in a Geriatric Population.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  4. Bayles, K. (1982) “Language function in senile dementia.” Brain and Language 16: 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayles, K. (1984) “Language and Dementia”. In A. Holland (ed.), Language Disorders in Adults, San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 209–44.Google Scholar
  6. Boden, D. & Bielby, D. (1986) “The way it was: topical organization in elderly conversation.” Language and Communication 6: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978) “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chafe, W. (1994) Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988) “Accommodating the elderly: invoking and extending a theory.” Language in Society 17: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1991) Language, Society and the Elderly. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Crystal, D. (1984) Linguistic Encounters with Language Handicap. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990) “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gergen, K. (1991) The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gergen, K. (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1967) “On Face-Work.” In Goffman, Interaction Ritual. Garden City: Doubleday, 5–45.Google Scholar
  19. Gubrium, J. (1975) Living and Dying at Murray Manor. NY: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  20. Gumperz, J. (2001) “Interactional Sociolinguistics: A Personal Perspective.” In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 215–28.Google Scholar
  21. Halliday, M. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  22. Halliday, M. (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar, second edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  23. Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton, H. (1991) “Accommodation and Mental Disability.” In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (eds.), Contexts of Accommodation, 157–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamilton, H. (1994a) Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton, H. (1994b) “Requests for Clarification as Evidence of Pragmatic Comprehension Difficulty.” In R. Bloom, L. Obler, S. DeSanti, & J. Ehlich (eds.), Discourse Analysis and Applications: Studies in Adult Clinical Populations, 185–99. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Hamilton, H.E. (1996) “Intratextuality, intertextuality and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer’s Disease.” Text 16/1: 61–90.Google Scholar
  28. Hamilton, H. (2000) “Dealing with Declining Health in Old Age: Identity Construction in the Oppen Family Letter Exchange.” In J. Peyton, P. Griffin, W. Wolfram, & R. Fasold (eds.), Language in Action: New Studies of Language in Society. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 599–610.Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton, H. (2003) Glimmers: A Journey into Alzheimer’s Disease. Ashland, OR: RiverWood Books.Google Scholar
  30. Irigaray, L. (1973) Le langage des déments. Le Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kempler, D. (1984) “Syntactic and Symbolic Abilities in Alzheimer’s Disease.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
  32. Kitwood, T. (1988) “The technical, the personal, and the framing of dementia.” Social Behaviour 3: 161–79.Google Scholar
  33. Kitwood, T. (1997) Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Light, L. (1993) “Language Change in Old Age.” In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J.C. Marshall, & C.W. Wallesch (eds.), Linguistic Disorders and Pathologies: An International Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 900–18.Google Scholar
  35. Lubinski, R.B. (1976) “Perceptions of Oral-Verbal Communication by Residents and Staff of an Institution for the Chronically Ill and Aged.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Columbia University Teachers College.Google Scholar
  36. Lubinski, R.B. (1981) “Language and aging: An environmental approach to intervention.” Topics in Language Disorders 1: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McTear, M. & King, F. (1991) “Miscommunication in Clinical Contexts: The Speech Therapy Interview.” In N. Coupland, H. Giles, & J. Wiemann (eds.), “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk. Newbury Park: Sage, 195–214.Google Scholar
  38. Melvold, J.L., Au, R., Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (1994) “Language during Aging and Dementia.” In M.L. Albert & J. Knoefel (eds.), Clinical Neurology of Aging (second edition). NY: Oxford University Press, 329–46.Google Scholar
  39. Obler, L. (1983) “Language and Brain Dysfunction in Dementia.” In S. Segalowitz (ed.), Language Functions and Brain Organization. NY: Academic Press, 267–82.Google Scholar
  40. Obler, L.K. & Albert, M.L. (eds) (1980) Language and Communication in the Elderly: Clinical Therapeutic, and Experimental Aspects. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  41. Ramanathan, V. (1997) Alzheimer Discourse: Some Sociolinguistic Dimensions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Ripich, D. & Terrell, B. (1988) “Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer’s Disease.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 53:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabat, S. & Harré, R. (1992) “The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer disease.” Ageing and Society 12: 443–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1978) “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 7–55. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schegloff, E. & Sacks, H. (1973) “Opening up closings”. Semiotica 8: 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Council of Europe (2004) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ulatowska, H.K. (ed.) (1985) The Aging Brain: Communication in the Elderly. San Diego CA: College Hill Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Heidi E. Hamilton 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi E. Hamilton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations