Advertisement

Controlling Chemical Weapons

  • Kim Coleman

Abstract

The entry into force of the 1993 CWC on 29 April 1997 was unique in the history of arms control. This agreement both banned an entire class of weapons and simultaneously addressed chemical proliferation concerns. It was not, however, the attention to non-proliferation that made the Convention unique, rather that the CWC incorporated an elaborate international system for verification of compliance.1

Keywords

Nerve Agent State Party Chemical Weapon Fighter Aircraft Inspection Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 6.
    See, SIPRI, The Problems of Chemical and Biological Warfare, 6 Vols, Stockholm (1971–1975).Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    J.P. Perry Robinson et al., ‘The Chemical Weapons Convention: The Success of Chemical Disarmament Negotiations’, SIPRI Yearbook 1993: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Oxford University Press (1993), pp. 705–734.Google Scholar
  3. 14.
    United States Department of Defense, Proliferation: Threat and Response, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 19.
    Amy E. Smithson and Maureen Lenihan, ‘The Destruction of Weapons Under the Chemical Weapons Convention’, Science and Global Security, 6 (1996), p. 93; Jonathan B. Tucker, ‘Russia’s Plan for Chemical Weapons Destruction’, Arms Control Today (July–August 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 23.
    Amy E. Smithson, ‘Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention at 11/2’, Report No. 25, Washington DC: Henry L. Stimson Center (1998), p. 66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Coleman 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Coleman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations